Author Topic: Russian assessment on war situation (Read 1153 times)

Pongo · « **on:** March 31, 2003, 11:05:16 AM »

from radio intercepts supposedly.

clearing house

--am-- · « **Reply #1 on:** March 31, 2003, 11:18:44 AM »

N1kPaz · « **Reply #2 on:** March 31, 2003, 11:19:50 AM »

jeez...i guess were gonna lose then huh??

NOT!!!

LOL

Martlet · « **Reply #3 on:** March 31, 2003, 11:25:01 AM »

We are only winning if you are watching the CNN propaganda. In reality, The Elite Republican Army has D.C. surrounded.

muckmaw · « **Reply #4 on:** March 31, 2003, 11:37:07 AM »

Russian Radio Intercepts report as follows:

March 31, 2002 GMT

The Glorious weapons of the Peoples Republic of Russia once again defeated Yankee Pig-Dog aggression in the area of Gofuk.

The powerful, advanced T-55 Main Battle tank, placed in the capable hands of the Iraqi's has thwarted all Capitalist Pig aggession, destroying 350 M1 Abrams, 4,607 APC, All the Artilery Pieces in the Middle East, 1100 Aircraft, 4 Aircraft Carriers, and 11 Bicycles.

Iraqi forces have overun Capitalist Pig-Dog positions, and have pushed them back into the sea.

Another glorious victory for the military equiptment of Mother Russia!

--am-- · « **Reply #5 on:** March 31, 2003, 11:48:50 AM »

If to shoot at a lateral projection M1A1, punches and T-34-85

And in a frontal projection it punch ZBM-26 (1983) and ZBM-32 (1984)

Martlet · « **Reply #6 on:** March 31, 2003, 11:50:32 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by --am--
If to shoot at a lateral projection M1A1, punches and T-34-85

And in a frontal projection it punch ZBM-26 (1983) and ZBM-32 (1984)

Stop using babelfish.

--am-- · « **Reply #7 on:** March 31, 2003, 11:54:02 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
Stop using babelfish.

You are incompetent (as usually)

Read and be educated:

http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/policy/du/du_e.pdf

http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/policy/du/du_c.pdf

john9001 · « **Reply #8 on:** March 31, 2003, 12:16:48 PM »

i think what -am- is trying to say is a WW2 T34 could kill a M1A1,
a T34 is in no threat way to M1A1 , it's just reduciles

AKIron · « **Reply #9 on:** March 31, 2003, 12:25:55 PM »

Wonder why we haven't seen any close ups of obviously destroyed M1s? You know, the sort of pictures that leave no doubt as to the serviceability of the vehicle. Makes me go hmmmm.

Otto · « **Reply #10 on:** March 31, 2003, 12:26:17 PM »

Fox News..

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,82613,00.html

john9001 · « **Reply #11 on:** March 31, 2003, 12:33:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
Wonder why we haven't seen any close ups of obviously destroyed M1s? You know, the sort of pictures that leave no doubt as to the serviceability of the vehicle.

you mean the blury out of focus pics of a "M1A1"? burning didn't convince you?

Pongo · « **Reply #12 on:** March 31, 2003, 01:24:10 PM »

The link I posted doenst say the US is going to lose..
Did you people even read it?

Martlet · « **Reply #13 on:** March 31, 2003, 01:26:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
The link I posted doenst say the US is going to lose..
Did you people even read it?

No, I don't waste my time reading things certain people post on here. If I want more propaganda, I'll catch the Peter Arnett re runs.

AKIron · « **Reply #14 on:** March 31, 2003, 01:27:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pongo
The link I posted doenst say the US is going to lose..
Did you people even read it?

I got this far before the BS meter pegged:

-- meeting was held at the main headquarters, at which an analysis of the maintenance status of the force was presented. In a personal telephone conversation with a colleague in the U.S., one of the meeting participants described that status as "deplorable," and in his words, "...one third of our equipment can be fearlessly taken to the dump.--