Author Topic: Fighter Acceleration Results: 18'000 ft (Read 1502 times)

Mister Fork · « **on:** April 06, 2003, 10:12:05 PM »

Aircraft | Sec | Accl[list=1]

Me 163 | 6.0 | 7.5
Bf 109G-10 | 24.8 | 1.8
Spit XIV | 25.1 | 1.8
Bf 109F-4 | 25.7 | 1.7
Bf 109G-2 | 26.7 | 1.7
P-38L | 26.8 | 1.7
F4U-4 | 27.0 | 1.7
Bf 109G-6 | 27.5 | 1.6
Spit IX | 27.7 | 1.6
Fw 190D-9 | 27.8 | 1.6
C205 | 28.5 | 1.6
P-47D-30 | 28.9 | 1.5
La-7 | 29.0 | 1.5
Fw 190A-5 | 29.5 | 1.5
P-51D | 29.9 | 1.5
Tempest V | 30.2 | 1.5
P-51B | 30.4 | 1.5
C202 | 30.6 | 1.5
Spit V | 30.6 | 1.5
Yak-9U | 30.7 | 1.5
Ta-152H | 30.9 | 1.4
La-5FN | 31.5 | 1.4
P-47D-25 | 31.5 | 1.4
F4F-4 | 31.9 | 1.4
P-47D-11 | 33.7 | 1.3
Seafire IIC | 34.2 | 1.3
Fw 190A-8 | 34.6 | 1.3
NIK2-J | 35.7 | 1.3
F4U-1D | 35.8 | 1.2
A6M5b | 36.9 | 1.2
F6F-5 | 37.1 | 1.2
Fw 190F-8 | 37.2 | 1.2
F4U-1C | 37.3 | 1.2
F4U-1 | 39.0 | 1.1
Me 262 | 39.3 | 1.1
Typhoon | 39.7 | 1.1
Bf 109E-4 | 41.2 | 1.1
Bf 110G-2 | 41.9 | 1.1
Mosq VI | 42.1 | 1.1
Hurr IIC | 42.9 | 1.0
Bf 110C-4b | 43.3 | 1.0
Ki-61-I-KAIc | 44.8 | 1.0
Yak-9T | 45.0 | 1.0
A6M2 | 45.2 | 1.0
Spit IA | 47.1 | 0.9
Hurr Mk 1 | 57.5 | 0.8
FM2 | 57.8 | 0.8
Hurr IID | 59.6 | 0.8
P-40E | 71.6 | 0.6
P-40B | 73.9 | 0.6

AdmRose · « **Reply #1 on:** April 06, 2003, 10:50:03 PM »

And you wonder why you never see a P-40 above 12,000 feet.

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #2 on:** April 07, 2003, 02:06:24 AM »

Now i know they all dive away at alt.

AND I LIKE HIGH ALTITUDE FIGHTS !!!!

Kweassa · « **Reply #3 on:** April 07, 2003, 03:36:53 AM »

Thanks for your efforts Mr.Fork!! Big !!

...

Man, I always thought that the 190s were fast accelerating planes. Compared with contemporary Spitfires, at both deck and alt, I don't think there's anyway AH 190s can ever be described "it out-accelerates the Spitfires"...

Kweassa · « **Reply #4 on:** April 07, 2003, 03:38:34 AM »

If possible, it'd be really great if we can see test results of 50%, 75% and 100% fuel..

It'd be interesting to see how the list changes again with different fuel load..

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #5 on:** April 07, 2003, 04:05:37 AM »

Why the tremendous difference between F4F4 and FM2?

Mister Fork · « **Reply #6 on:** April 07, 2003, 08:27:22 AM »

I ran those two planes through the same test twice GH because I was surprised too. I also retested the 109F4/G2 and the P-38 just to make sure the numbers were correct.

The F4F-4 for it's age halls ass. Who knows why? I doesn't even have WEP compared to the FM2.

Kweassa - I tried that actually - giving a few aircraft more fuel on the top five and reran the tests. The results are not 'much' different - it just takes longer to accelerate.

LLv34_Camouflage · « **Reply #7 on:** April 07, 2003, 11:02:05 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Why the tremendous difference between F4F4 and FM2?

Maybe the same thing that happened with the Brewster? Too much weight in the "upgrades" and no significant increase in horsepower.

Camo

Urchin · « **Reply #8 on:** April 07, 2003, 11:12:46 AM »

Except I believe the FM2 actually weighed a little less than the F4F4 and had more horsepower. I guess it could have something to do with the gearing in the supercharger, but I would think the FM2 would be superior.

Puke · « **Reply #9 on:** April 07, 2003, 05:22:35 PM »

Yep. FM2 was quite a bit lighter and had an increase in hp over the F4F-4.

Wait a minute, why is the FM2 down at the bottom of the list. I'm guessing these aircraft got transposed in the list.

HFMudd · « **Reply #10 on:** April 07, 2003, 06:13:11 PM »

Or the FM2 and F4F got transposed in the AH look-up tables. Sounds like a good one to ask HTC about.

Mister Fork · « **Reply #11 on:** April 07, 2003, 06:22:16 PM »

I just re-did the FM2 test. Yep, she's a slow beast. 57+ seconds.

Can anyone explain why the FM2 is a slow tard compared to the F4F-4?

funkedup · « **Reply #12 on:** April 07, 2003, 06:35:25 PM »

IIRC the FM2 had a much lower rated altitude than the F4F-4.

vorticon · « **Reply #13 on:** April 07, 2003, 09:31:47 PM »

according to that the hurri2c is only 1 step slower to accelerate than the mosquito...i always thought that was a very fast medium bomber...weird

Zigrat · « **Reply #14 on:** April 07, 2003, 10:55:16 PM »

doesnt make much sense though funky, take a look at the climb rate chanrts for the 2 of em. Does the fm2 match its advertised climb rate at that alt?

(T-D)*V=d/dt(1/2mv^2+mgh)
Ps=v/g*dv/dt+dh/dt