Al Capone's Vault

[Rude]

Originally posted by SirLoin
Invasion,destabilisation,massive loss of life...And NO "weapons of mass destruction" found...None...Zero...

Of course if Ol' George had waited a few weeks for the weapons inspectors to finish their job,they would have found the same with out the terrible human sacrifice.

Notice it's all about "liberation" and not disarmament anymore?

Hey Sirloin....make sure you post back here when they find WMD....be interesting to see if you have the stones to admit you were wrong.

[SirLoin]

Originally posted by Rude
Hey Sirloin....make sure you post back here when they find WMD....be interesting to see if you have the stones to admit you were wrong.

I will Rude.

[SirLoin]

Originally posted by john9001
a pesticide is a nerve agent

So is urathane among hundreds of other chemicals found in the common workplace.

[lazs2]

canadians consider the french... canadians?   What is the split without the frogs?

How many "inspectors" did they have to search a place the size of California?   How many iraqi's do you think would come forward to point out sites while the sadmans regime was in power... I mean... what could happen to em if they helped right?

you liberals really are pinheads... do you not think that the sadman will continue to try to harm the U.S.  every way that he can including funding and training terrorists?  do you not believe that as long as he is in power his people will die by the thousands in torture chambers and genocide?  

do you not think that getting rid of this despot sends a good message to the remaining despots of the world who laugh when they hear a u.n. council is in session?
lazs

[GRUNHERZ]

Its funny how the anti-war crowd has all of a sudden decided a war is only justified if and only if it has a single objective and that it never changes or other elements become more important or see more public light.

It is about WMD.
It is about removing a destablizing and dangerous mideast tryant.
It is about liberating the Iraqi people.
It is about terrorism.
It is about creating a new more US friendly Iraq.
It is, in the big picture about oil, otherwise nobody would ever pay any attention to the arabs - and there is nothing wrong with that.
It is about fostering democracy in Iraq.
It is about political reform in the region.
It is about holding Saddam accountable to the 1991 cease fire terms.

[lazs2]

well said grun.
lazs

[Ripsnort]

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Its funny how the anti-war crowd has all of a sudden decided a war is only justified if and only if it has a single objective and that it never changes or other elements become more important or see more public light.

It is about WMD.
It is about removing a destablizing and dangerous mideast tryant.
It is about liberating the Iraqi people.
It is about terrorism.
It is about creating a new more US friendly Iraq.
It is, in the big picture about oil, otherwise nobody would ever pay any attention to the arabs - and there is nothing wrong with that.
It is about fostering democracy in Iraq.
It is about political reform in the region.
It is about holding Saddam accountable to the 1991 cease fire terms.

SHACK!

[SLO]

Laz you make American Imperialism shine my friend.....

As for being French...oh yes I am...even before being CANADIAN....I'm French....hope that bugs the **** outta of ya.

but Im also Canadian EH!!:p

personnelly I don't give a rats bellybutton what you think about me or the language I chose to talk....your probably limited to only 1....your loss

it will be the UN who gives legitimacy to the new Iraqis Govr.....If you decide otherwise and control Iraq.....occupation by an Imperialist nation is not well viewed in ARAB countries....actually it would be stupid....

THEY HAVE NOT FOUND ANY WMD's....hope they do find some....just a little.

I still don't agree by how your GOVR chose to start this conflict....

I don't agree today...I won't agree tommorrow either....

maybe if monkey brains woulda paid more attention to his biggest trade partner maybe we woulda been there OFFICIALLY.

I still think that once it started my govr. shoulda changed its mind and helped a friend....that I still have trouble with.

[Rude]

Thanks Sirloin:)

[falken]

Every upstanding human with a IQ over 100 know that "weapons of mass destructions" was used as an covering of the fact that and ex alcoholic American president wanted to revenge His father (hey that man tried to kill my dad)

LOL this world is going down the drain


And if those weapons really concerns the US why the hell dont they attack North Korea, Pakistan, India and China ?

[Martlet]

Originally posted by falken
Every upstanding human with a IQ over 100 know that "weapons of mass destructions" was used as an covering of the fact that and ex alcoholic American president wanted to revenge His father (hey that man tried to kill my dad)

LOL this world is going down the drain


And if those weapons really concerns the US why the hell dont they attack North Korea, Pakistan, India and China ?

This argument was lame the first 100 times I heard it.

[straffo]

I don't agree with all but some :

It is about removing a destablizing and dangerous mideast tryant.
It is about liberating the Iraqi people.

It is about creating a new more US friendly Iraq.
It is, in the big picture about oil, otherwise nobody would ever pay any attention to the arabs - and there is nothing wrong with that.
It is about fostering democracy in Iraq.
It is about political reform in the region.
It is about holding Saddam accountable to the 1991 cease fire terms.

And it's fine for me
I've doubt for this only :

// It is about WMD.
// It is about terrorism.

[falken]

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Its funny how the anti-war crowd has all of a sudden decided a war is only justified if and only if it has a single objective and that it never changes or other elements become more important or see more public light.

It is about WMD.
It is about removing a destablizing and dangerous mideast tryant.
It is about liberating the Iraqi people.
It is about terrorism.
It is about creating a new more US friendly Iraq.
It is, in the big picture about oil, otherwise nobody would ever pay any attention to the arabs - and there is nothing wrong with that.
It is about fostering democracy in Iraq.
It is about political reform in the region.
It is about holding Saddam accountable to the 1991 cease fire terms.

heay !

kill Saudi Arabia and Egypt if it was cause of WMD and terrorism
There will never be Democracy in the Arabian countries dont lie, they just cant cope with it.
And political reforms cant not be dictated from our western hemisphere, just cant be done withour decades of riots of the muslim world. Try read some history and learn

If we had not used all those money on wars, military, and weapons of mass destruction, we would not have any need for oil anyway because our engineers woulda found a better and cleaner way to warm up houses, powering cars and so on

[GRUNHERZ]

Originally posted by falken


And if those weapons really concerns the US why the hell dont they attack North Korea, Pakistan, India and China ?

Ahh yes the other great  anti-war argument. Why not attack Great Britain, France or Russia too?

Another funny thing about the anti-war crowd is how they lambasted Bush as a dim witted moron for decribing our enemies as "evil" - many said that was too simple and not nuanced enough for the complexities of the real world.

Yet now they emply some of the most ridiculous simplistic nonsensical arguments against the war, like why not attack any other unrelated country with WMD.

And finally lets not forget the samm deatil that Iraq was ordered not to have WMD as a condition of the 1991 cease fire.

I'm assuming you are troll falken so I'm not sure it really matters to even respoind to you but there it is.

[Ripsnort]

Originally posted by SLO
maybe if monkey brains woulda paid more attention to his biggest trade partner maybe we woulda been there OFFICIALLY.

What does China have to do with this?