Saddam Killed

[Hristo]

Originally posted by Hangtime
why ain't we hearing you wail about yer butt-monkey russian hero pals still sitting in grozny, now that they have it 'secured'?

 

My butt-monkey russian heroes ? When did you get an impression I ever supported their aggressive war ?

I live in a country which has very well felt what an aggressive socialist big brother is, you know.

[GRUNHERZ]

And if we leave right now you wont complain of how we abandon Iraq?  

BTW please answer my question do you have any basis for your belief that the USA will steal the oil?

[Hristo]

Grunherz, do not talk about yourself. You've been sitting back in the States. You makes this sound like you are sitting on one of the Iraqi oil wells yourself.

US shouldn't have been in Iraq in the first place. At least not without UN resolution but as a part of UN delegated force.


An aggression without proof wasn't enough ?

Oil wells intact being among top priority targets weren't enough ?

GWB belonging to oil company lobbies wasn't enough ?

Leaving UN out of future Iraq governement doesn't concern you ?

Announcing US forces will stay in a country, which, interestingly, has 2nd largest oil reserves on the planet. Not enough yet ?

Please ....

[Martlet]

Originally posted by Hristo
Grunherz, do not talk about yourself. You've been sitting back in the States. You makes this sound like you are sitting on one of the Iraqi oil wells yourself.

US shouldn't have been in Iraq in the first place. At least not without UN resolution but as a part of UN delegated force.


An aggression without proof wasn't enough ?

Oil wells intact being among top priority targets weren't enough ?

GWB belonging to oil company lobbies wasn't enough ?

Leaving UN out of future Iraq governement doesn't concern you ?

Announcing US forces will stay in a country, which, interestingly, has 2nd largest oil reserves on the planet. Not enough yet ?

Please ....

Ahhhh, it's great to be #1.

[Kanth]

Originally posted by Hristo

An aggression without proof wasn't enough ?

proof that he wasn't cooperating? 12 years of proof isn't enough?

Oil wells intact being among top priority targets weren't enough ?

Oil Wells being that nations sole income, with knowledge that he WILL light them on fire isn't enough?

Economy - overview Iraq's economy is dominated by the oil sector, which has traditionally provided about 95% of foreign exchange earnings.

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/iz.html

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/21/sprj.irq.oil.wells/

GWB belonging to oil company lobbies wasn't enough ?

which lobbies does bush belong to?

Leaving UN out of future Iraq governement doesn't concern you ?

on the contrary, we have said that the UN should be part of the future of Iraq, but that they will not run it.

http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/03040400.htm

Announcing US forces will stay in a country, which, interestingly, has 2nd largest oil reserves on the planet. Not enough yet ?

So we bomb them and bail? AND leave their oil wells burning? now if we did that the same people'd be screaming that we didn't do enough to rebuild them after the war, you can't have it both ways.

[Hristo]

proof that he wasn't cooperating? 12 years of proof isn't enough?

It is UN's role to take measures when someone doesn't comply with their resolutions. US is not UN.

Oil Wells being that nations sole income, with knowledge that he WILL light them on fire isn't enough?

Oil wells are not Iraq's sole income. The valley of Euphrates and Tigris were feeding the population since the beginning of civilization known to man.

Would he put them on fire if US didn't attack ?

Even if he puts them on fire, it is Iraq's problem, not US problem. You don't want me to believe good old GWB cares about Iraqis, right ?

which lobbies does bush belong to?
His family is involved in companies which deal with arms and oil. Is it a coincidence he pushes for war which uses arms to grab oil ?

on the contrary, we have said that the UN should be part of the future of Iraq, but that they will not run it.

Finally, a good decision. Let's hope we live to see it.

So we bomb them and bail? AND leave their oil wells burning? now if we did that the same people'd be screaming that we didn't do enough to rebuild them after the war, you can't have it both ways.

Don't bomb in the first place. I feel you've bombed so you can get there and stay.