Well the way the post was put I understood it as such that entering outside the christian religion was prohibited.
That would clearly fall in the discriminating category.
However I noticed that the first amendmend speaks of the government, not individual persons.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances"
So in that sense I was wrong. It's not unconstitutional, it's just against the universal declaration of human rights, by UN.
But as I've heard multiple times lately on this board, UN is a useless organization with no value for this planet.
I wish people would understand that the UN is the single most thing the nations of this planet have ever come up with in effort to build ourselves a peaceful, better planet.
Sure UN has messed up royally on many accounts, it's stricken by politics. Still I loathe anyone who states it's useless or non worthy. Because it's not. The whole purpose of the UN was to stop armed conflicts, so it was only logical that they wanted to prevent the conflict from happening untill the end.
The UN represents the common good will of all the nations of this world, but the very structure of it that gives veto powers to the large nations, prevents it from being effective in conflicts where the interests of the member nations also conflict.
However the UN is not about giving the US an attack permission or not, it's much much more than that.
