Probably my last attempt to argue with the radio. Radio always knows better. It simply repeats what they say on the other end and never listens to your arguments.
No, Stalin doesn't piss me off any more than any other genocidal dictator from Hitler to Idi Amin to Hussein does.
Well, your "peacemakers" couldn't even accuse Miloshevich in genocide. Blah blah as it alway goes.
More than anything, those kind of people make me feel sorry for the populations they oppress and slaughter.
Again trying to tell me I am/was opressed and slaughtered?! JFYI: majority of Soviet people lived much better under USSR then now in "democratic" society.
Aggression? Great comeback there Yakov!
Who the hell is that Yakov!? I think I should call you Kvaka-Zadavaka or mister Twister next time.
Invasion of Finland ring any bells for you?
Toad, "invasion" in Finland had only one purpose: to protect Leningrad, and you know it. League of Nations didn't recognize Soviet term of "indirect agression" (BTW, a bad translation, "kosvennaya agressiya" is quite different from "nepryamaya agressiya"), but this term exactly describes what happened in June 24th on Finnish border. JFYI, after the White-Finnish war USSR simply forced an exchange of territory, offered to Finns before the war.
Stabbing Poland in the back? Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty? Soviet troops invaded Polish territory from the east on September 17, 1939 while the following treaties and agreements were in effect between the governments of Poland and the Soviet Union:
Skipping the list of treaties with Polish state that by Sept. 17th 1939 ceased to exist. Now tell me how many people Red Army saved from nazis in Eastern Poland. Then tell me why French army, 80 divisions, and British army didn't do ANYTHING about German invasion against their ally. Then tell me why noone in the "free world" said anything against Soviet Union entering former Polish territory.
This one is definetly the best:
The Convention for the Definition of Aggression signed in London on July 3, 1933.
This "convention" didn't include basic concepts like indirect agression. As usually, "free world" motivation was clear and bold: to make Hitler attack USSR, and then get everything for free. Some countries even succeeded in such politics.
Oh, yeah.. remember what happened on 15 June 1940 in Lithuania?
June 17, 1940 in Latvia?
September 28, 1939 in Estonia?
You call THAT an "agression"!? Damn, it happened after absolutely Democratic procedures. Not even forced like "democratic" elections in West Germany and South Korea. JFYI: nazi Germany was an open threat to Pribaltic states. Annexion of Memel/Klaipeda is definetly unknown?
The "incorporation" of Albania, Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia into the Soviet Union after WW2?
Toad, usually I quit discussions with people who show such brilliant ignorance in history. Reading your posts I just can't understand - is it just you so tragically misinformed or it is a new-fangled "truth" that Western people are fed now, with history completely rewritten and forgotten
And of course things didn't really change after Stalin did they?
There's November 4th, 1956, a date all Hungarians probably remember.
Or the night of August 20-21 1968, a time I'm sure all Czech's probably remember.
I just wonder what will US of A do when some day they'll find people in a "friendly" country hanging your allies on lamp posts. And JFYI: "invasions" in Hungary and Czechoslovakia were perforemed by Warsaw Treaty troops, not only Soviet.
Again: did anyone in the "free world" care about poor Magyars and Czechs? Did they do anything to help them after they arranged that great provocations? No they didn't.
Now, please, I want to hear your version of what US of A did several times in Panama (including open state terrorism against Columbia), Grenada, Cuba and many other countries.
How about open support to terrorist organisations, including terrorist bombings of Yugoslavia, supplying weapons to Afghan "rebels", Chechen terrorists, etc. I simply fail to name a terrorist organisation that didn't get support from the "land of free".
When it comes to "International Gangster", I think the Soviet Union gets to keep the trophy. No other nation will ever come close.
Currently there is just one nation that acts using purely criminal methods in it's foreign policy. Many things changed here in past 12 years. Nothing changed in your country. The same people who planned a "limited nuclear war" against Russia 20 years ago keep the same political line. Unfortunately there in no more USSR to stop that gangsters who drop cassete bombs on children to assure future profits for monopolies they control.
Pretty cool when Stalin also assured that you folks will forever have the "Genocide against a nation's own population" trophy locked up forever too......
I seriously doubt the day will ever come that ANY nation will topple the record of aggression and abuse of their neighbors and citizens that the Soviet Union managed to compile in such a relatively short time.
I only can point that USA did a great job in genocide of Indians. We have fundamental differences in our mentalities... You will tell me all that HR blabla, but just look what was going on in your own country 30-40 years ago. Just tell me, could anyone openly state he was a member of Communist party, and where he could have find himself very soon.
But you go ahead and be proud of that.... it's what makes you such a valuable comedy addition to this BBS!
Keep 'em coming! You've got me laughing so hard my face hurts. Toad, you can laugh as much as you can. You're welcome. I only advise you to go read some books that don't contain only the Party Line approved materials, allowed for reading by US military personell.