Author Topic: c205 compared to la7 (Read 1237 times)

J_A_B · « **Reply #30 on:** April 21, 2003, 10:59:06 PM »

Perk points for unique handles....yeah, I could dig it

J_A_B

Karnak · « **Reply #31 on:** April 21, 2003, 11:32:01 PM »

The only problem I have with the "Add in high altitude plateaus" solution is that it leaves other low altitude aircraft still screwed.

If you happen to prefer the P-40E, Mosquito Mk VI, La-5FN, P-39 (when it is added) ect, ect you still have to face the full fury of the La-7s.

The high altitude aircraft like the P-51D, Spitfire Mk IX, P-38L and P-47D will all get a good boost though.

Griego · « **Reply #32 on:** April 22, 2003, 12:12:36 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by J_A_B

That lack of versatility and combat duration is IMO what keeps the LA7 from being "too good", and probably is why it doesn't see more use than it does.

J_A_B

WHAAAHHAAHAHAAA!:D

bj229r · « **Reply #33 on:** April 22, 2003, 02:56:38 AM »

at 5k on wep..LA7 is 50 knots faster...what more is there?

SLO · « **Reply #34 on:** April 22, 2003, 02:57:08 PM »

hmm no1 talked about how much better and faster the 205 is in a dive........

boy can that baby dive fast....without stick freeze

if ya a vertical fighter....205 is the plane

its just that the la7 never seems too stall......thats why its UBER

same for niki...retains its speed too long...never stalls

RightF00T · « **Reply #35 on:** April 22, 2003, 03:50:31 PM »

La7 never stalls? lol Ive rammed them enough coming down from rope to know that they do.

SLO · « **Reply #36 on:** April 23, 2003, 08:28:26 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by RightF00T
La7 never stalls? lol Ive rammed them enough coming down from rope to know that they do.

learn to fly:p

and stop ramming planes man.....not good;)

vorticon · « **Reply #37 on:** April 29, 2003, 03:29:16 PM »

thats it ive found good HARD evidence that the c205's climb rate (on wep) is BETTER that the la7's above 7.5k alt according to netaces charts...suckas...