Now cool off a tad my dear Americans. GScholz may be burning your pride a bit, but I think he is correct, and there is no use getting personal and offensive about this.
The US army has been known for trigger-happiness since WW2, and that "cowboy" reputation will take a long time to shake off.
My great uncle flew in WW2, he got fired at and bombed by the US, and also observed that they would even keep their fire button unlocked during landing!! A common knowledge at the time was to be careful around the Americans, for they often fired before establishing a proper ID. Happens in war, anyway.
Aside from this point, I am sensing some arrogance towards the British, as if they had merely been in GWII as a sideshow. Now that is nothing but a naive attempt to an insult, - the British were there at the US side, mounting a considerable force on ground and air (and 2/3 of the armour), and getting into heavy engagements many times with very acceptable results.
Just face it, there were friendly fire incidents in which the US were mostly responsible, that's it, it happened and is to be learned from for improvement rather than defending it's credibility to the bloody end.
Finally, I belive GScholz is a veteran soldier, not just the armchair version
