Author Topic: P-47  (Read 5780 times)

Offline Naudet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 729
P-47
« Reply #30 on: May 05, 2003, 11:55:55 AM »
Quote
Moorer says that Gen. George C Marshall came into the meeting and said quote "That's the end of this briefing. As long as I'm in charge there will never be a Marine in Europe".


F4UDOA, LOL that really doesnt sound like altitude problems. :)
As i not really deep into US-planes, altitude was my 1st thought but seems my 2nd that it was just one of this old Army vs. Marines vs. Navy rivalry things.

The Marines and the Navy took the pacific, so the Army couldnt let them take europe too. ;) :D

@Hristo: Not just the Jugs jockeys do a good thing staying in AH, the FW190D9 maniacs do as well. God, IL2:FB is something like a commercial for Sowjet fighterplane, never will i spent any money on an Oleg Maddox game again. :mad:
« Last Edit: May 05, 2003, 12:02:00 PM by Naudet »

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9437
P-47
« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2003, 12:38:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Naudet
At low altittudes the FW190A will outperform the P47 cause it has the better speed and climb at low/med alts, as the FW190A was a low/med alt fighter and the P47 was a high altittude escort fighter.
Especially the light FW190A5 will do very well against a P47.

An age-old debate; count me on the side of the 47 afficionados.  FWIW, I add the following account from Roger A. Freeman’s Bible of 8th AF operations, “The Mighty Eighth,” at page 125.  What I like about the AH P-47 (at least, the D11), is that it is possible to duplicate Mahurin’s third encounter (note altitudes).

This occurred on the March 6, 1944 mission to Berlin.  At the time Mahurin, of the 56th FG, had 16 victories:  

- oldman

   Captain Walker Mahurin, leading Red Flight, said:  "At the time of the attack, we were unaware of the actual presence of the E/A.  We first noticed them when we began to see the flashes of the 20-mm shells bursting around the firsts division of bombers....by the time we got into the combat vicinity the concentrated attack had been dispersed leaving the E/A flying singly and in twos and threes down on the clouds at 7,000 feet.

   "I noticed three of these E/A about 11 o'clock to me down low:  after considerable manoeuvring, I was in a position to attack one of these E/A, a single Me109.  As I came down on him he saw me, and after one turn to the left, he headed down for the clouds.  I found myself closing on his tail.  I fired several short bursts, none of which hit him.  He finally disappeared into the clouds.

   "When I pulled up from this attack, I sighted a single FW190 at about 9 o'clock to my flight, heading down for the deck.  This Jerry also saw me.  As soon as the element of surprise was gone I knew I would be forced to follow him before he straightened out, before I could make a proper attack.  We milled around and around in a turning circle to the left, until suddenly the 190 straightened out and headed for one of the half-mile-in-diameter clouds which covered the area.  As he did so, I closed in behind him and started to fire.  By this time we were both in the cloud and it turned out to be considerably thinner than either one of us had anticipated.  I could still see the Hun, and when I fired I saw many hits on both of his wings, as well as a few on his fuselage.  I was close enough to him so that my hits did not converge to a point.  I was then forced to break off the attack as the cloud obscured him.  This 190 I claim as probably destroyed, because I hit him quite heavily.

   "By this time the flight had worked itself down to about 3,000 feet and were darting in and out of the clouds trying to spot more Huns.  The Huns were darting in and out of the clouds trying to evade Thunderbolts.

   "As we climbed back towards the bombers, I looked over the side of my ship and spotted a Thunderbolt in a turning circle to the left with an FW190 on its tail.  I immediately called on the R/T to tell the '47 to break left, however, I later discovered that it was a ship from the 78th Group and on a different frequency to ours.  I led the flight into attack the 190, which was all silver and with a large black "V" painted on its side.  He saw us coming, because he broke the attack and began to turn left to save his own hide.  I throttled back and closed in behind him, but held my fire until he, too, would straighten out.

   "In the turn itself I was only just able to stay with him, both of us would stall a bit and then recover.  However, when I added water I was able to out-turn him and also able to go around the circle faster than he did.  I got within 150 yards of him and stayed there.  After we had both gone around the circle several times, he pulled up into a steep climb.  I followed and was able to get in a few shots, as I closed on him in the climb.  As he fell off, he rolled over in order to pull the old stand-by of the Luftwaffe - the split S.  I followed this also, gaining on him in the dive.  When he pulled out of the dive he headed straight for the clouds in the same manner as the other Jerry had.  I was able to pepper him soundly, seeing many hits on both wings and fuselage.  The Jerry appeared to be having difficulty in flying his ship.  He made a 180 degree turn to the left, and as I pulled up I saw his canopy fly off and saw him jump over the side."

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
P-47
« Reply #32 on: May 05, 2003, 02:43:13 PM »
I don't know about a P-47 out diving a 109 or a 190 (seems likely they could out dive a 109, the controls stiffen up at ~400 mph, all the P-47 would have to do is roll and change direction slightly), but niether the 109 or the 190 will out dive a Spitfire IX in a steep dive.  They can both outrun Spit IX's by diving shallow to build up speed and then pulling level or into a slight climb until the Spitfire's speed has worn off.

Offline Naudet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 729
P-47
« Reply #33 on: May 05, 2003, 02:43:41 PM »
Oldmann, as you noticed i made a special mention of the A5.
In March 1944 the P47 usually faced heavy loaded A7s or A8s that lost most of their advantages.

Here the describtion of an encounter from Willy Reschke with his FW190A8/R2 against two P47s.
After a fierce fight with USAAF escorts, were the P51s outnumbered Reschkes Gruppe, he managed to get away from the fighting. On his return flight Reschke ran into 2 P47s at 2000ms.
He mentions that his FW190 turned much better than the P47s and without a problem he was behind the 2nd P47 within two turns and hit him with a quick burst. The P47 started to smoke and headed for home, the other P47 did the same and ran to the west.
Reschke who was more interested to get home in one piece than to score another kill, decided to land at his homeairfield.

You see, it works both sides. :)

Offline Don

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
P-47
« Reply #34 on: May 06, 2003, 12:12:09 PM »
I read Francis Gabreski's book about a month ago, and started flying the P-47 in the MA, to get the feeling of what I had read; I have been flying it almost exclusively since then. It is a beast, and forgiving as long as you have plenty of speed. I chose the P-47 D30, and use it mostly to Jabo, but then I stick around :)
I am still learning it but so far I have found that it is great at altitude, where many other a/c seem to be standing still as I go after them. If at or below 200 kias, ya may as well go home, because it is too slow to keep in the air (yer stall buzzer will stay on). It is a fine jabo, and has airbrakes as you dive onto a target. It's dive is incredible, and you hafta be careful or you will be in exces of 400 kias and not know until too late. Its roll rate is excellent, and you can get decent turning for limited periods by use of hi speed flaps and airbrakes.
The 8 .50 cal guns are as awesome as the 4 20mm of an FW A8, and prolly more accurate.
Historically it was the most manufactured a/c in US history, even more than the P-51; that had to happen for a reason.

Offline DoctorYO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 696
P-47
« Reply #35 on: May 09, 2003, 03:46:31 PM »
Ammo is correct,

People who are getting outdived are not using zero G, or the dive angle is too shallow and they are getting out engined..

at zero g the Jug dives like a brick...  stable and effective...  In my opinion the only plane that comes close to dive acceleration is the p38..  and she shakes like a earthquake...

While were on this topic of JUGs im curious what others use for their convergence...

Mine is set staggered at 4 guns 275m and 4 guns 300m...

This gives me a nice pattern for snapshots and high deflection solutions... nose low breaking planes almost always get tagged with this setup..

I was dogfighting superior aircraft in the training arena the other day, the JUG has attributes alot of the other heavies dont have... First and Foremost, stability...  The Jug near stall speed is extremely stable with flap usage...again i say with flap usage....  even under 150mph now it doesn't turn too well but in such a situation being able to point your nose high with out stalling could allow to do mini high yo yo's with ease...  This translates into a non turning jug  able to saddle people for minimum of at least a gun solution...

that means death for the bad guy...  Try that in a corsair.. and youll spin all over the place.....

These little advantages add up...  

exp...  when i want to accelerate i never level off.... I nose down .5k per min and lose 500ft, big deal on the alt. loss my acceleration is nearly 1.5-2times that if i were level.... in other aircraft you dont get that type of bonus...

I fly the D11..  and sometimes the d30..

1 500lbr isn't as bad as it seems considering the .50 cal loadout....

IMO the D11 is the best version...  Views take alittle getting use to but the stablity and weight difference are very noticable..  yeah you also notice the lackluster climb also...  no plane is perfect...


2 cents...

DoctorYO


PS:   I give free lessons in the TA for anyone interested...

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
P-47
« Reply #36 on: May 10, 2003, 02:26:19 PM »
Quote
IMO the D11 is the best version... Views take alittle getting use to but the stablity and weight difference are very noticable.. yeah you also notice the lackluster climb also... no plane is perfect...

I can only hope that in AH2 we'll get a razorback with a paddle blade prop. She'll be faster then the D30 and about the same in climb (and still handles better). The D11 really needs just that little extra power - She'll be perfect then :)

Bozon
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
P-47
« Reply #37 on: May 10, 2003, 02:51:44 PM »
"While were on this topic of JUGs im curious what others use for their convergence...

Mine is set staggered at 4 guns 275m and 4 guns 300m... "


I like to put all 8 of mine at 300 yds.  I really like the results when you you hit them at that range.
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline hazed-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2467
      • http://combatarena.users.btopenworld.com
P-47
« Reply #38 on: May 11, 2003, 11:07:52 AM »
there was an interveiw with Gabreski on the history channel once and he said the P47 D-11 was his favourite because after that they added too much armour and weight to the aircraft for his liking. He says the reason was that for every 10lbs of weight and engine needs a 100HP to negate it.

What we have in AH is the problem that the MA does in no way represent the typical skies of WW2.

we dont have the same length of time flying these aircraft as those pilots did.We dont often fly in the numbers and formations they did.We dont have the limits of strength and tollerance to G that they did.We dont have the fear of death the worry and pressure.
When the LW began to collapse they had a SEVERE drop in the average pilots skill. Just take a look at the gun camera films.Some of those 190s are shot don flying level with their drop tanks still on.The pilots encountered once the LW was battered in 1943-44 were mostly green pilots with less than a few hours flying time in the combat aircraft. The allies began to see so few of the LW that even the aces like gabreski struggled to find them in great numbers and often when they did encounter them the allies had numbers advantage.
Even the simple addition of a wingman can make a P47 change from a good aircraft into a GREAT aircraft. I'd imagine if we flew P47s in the later stages of WW2 and encountered 190s above 27,000 we would also say we were unbeatable.That doesnt mean that if we suddenly left our squadron and piled into the 190s on our own that we would be garenteed a win does it?.

what these pilots statements tell us is more the overall picture of the WHOLE air situation. They are commenting on how they felt , ie how safe they felt in those planes and what it was like to face enemies up there. It isnt a coldy scientific interpretation.

The best place to look for this more scientific comparison is in the government tests performed on captured aircraft.The pilots who test the planes have the unique experience of flying both the enemy and friendly aircraft usually in a safe area where the emotional pressure of possibly dieing to enemy fire is removed from the analasis.Same way it is in AH really.

I think the P47 in AH is a good aircraft. On comparison with the 190a5 which i have flown a lot I would say the P47 is the better aircraft because it exceeds the 190s performance in areas which allow fight dictation. It has better high alt performance and is also very rugged (in AH i think it seems a tad weak). It can outturn the 190 at high speed and has flaps that are actually usefull in combat.It also has more capabilities due to the possible loadout options.

I think you just need to change the way you are using it and a good way would be to ask ammo to fly some with you and teach you how to use it :D

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
P-47
« Reply #39 on: May 11, 2003, 02:54:04 PM »
I think the P-47s are better 'fighters' than the 190A-8 and D-9, but not as good as a 109 or the 190A5.

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9437
P-47
« Reply #40 on: May 12, 2003, 03:02:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by -ammo-
I like to put all 8 of mine at 300 yds.

Me, too.

- oldman

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
P-47
« Reply #41 on: May 13, 2003, 09:23:19 AM »
While talking of my favorite plane, can anyone tell me what the differences are between the versions? (like 11, 25 and 30)

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
P-47
« Reply #42 on: May 13, 2003, 09:49:09 AM »
D11 is lighter and turns a lot better, canopy design is "cage" not "bubble", having less visibility. Its also a bit slower than the other P-47s.

D25 and D30 are almost identical, the D30 having hardpoints for more ordenance which cause more drag and take off like 5 or 10 mph off the speed (compared to D30).

D30 has dive flaps.

Both D25 and D30 are faster overall but much worse turners than the D30 (since they are heavier).

All 3 are F- UGLY ;)
« Last Edit: May 13, 2003, 09:51:46 AM by OIO »

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
P-47
« Reply #43 on: May 13, 2003, 09:59:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by OIO
the D30 having hardpoints for more ordenance which cause more drag and take off like 5 or 10 mph off the speed (compared to D30).


lol, you'd might consider editing this :D

And the jug isnt ugly!!

tnx tho

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
P-47
« Reply #44 on: May 13, 2003, 11:53:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by OIO
D11 is lighter and turns a lot better, canopy design is "cage" not "bubble", having less visibility. Its also a bit slower than the other P-47s.

D25 and D30 are almost identical, the D30 having hardpoints for more ordenance which cause more drag and take off like 5 or 10 mph off the speed (compared to D30).

D30 has dive flaps.

Both D25 and D30 are faster overall but much worse turners than the D30 (since they are heavier).

All 3 are F- UGLY ;)


Actually the fastest of the three at all altitudes is the D11.

The D11 is slightly more manueverable, but it does turn "alot" better.  A better statemnt would be that it it is more forgiving in a stall fight:)

The D25 and the D30 are identical in FM, however the D30 has a more powerful WEP system allowing a better climbrate.  The D30 has zero length rocket rails while the d25 must have the attached rocket tubes if the user chooses to use rockets. The tubes hurt your Air to Air performance.

All three AC are the most beautifull military AC ever produced.
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011