change of command in Iraq.

[Pongo]

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Why do you think that?

Because you have demonstrated it in every post you have ever made. Your as brain washed as they come.

Oh well. No weapons of mass destruction. I wont bother linking in all the posts by people here that insisted that was a great justification for invasion.
As to some of us sitting arround waiting for what we fortold to come to fruition. Well most of us were wrong about the ease with which the US would defeat the Iraqis. Most of us admited it like men.
Some of you could learn from that, when the parts we were right about prove true.

[Martlet]

Originally posted by Maniac
Please feel free to specify your "tons" of findings...

Missiles, exceeding allowed range.
Several mobile labs.
warheads that are chemical capable.
underground labs.
etc etc.

[Saurdaukar]

Originally posted by Maniac
Please feel free to specify your "tons" of findings...

Now that thats been taken care of, perhaps youd be good enough to explain to me why Mr. Blix and his posse failed to disarm Iraq after 12 years of inspections?

[Rude]

Originally posted by Dowding
Sorry Rude. I was just playing up to your illusions of grandeur. Not that people failing to do that has ever stopped you from (s)pouting. We all remember your days of refering to yourself in the third person like the kings of antiquity (and the nut-cases of modernity).

As for playing AH - I just play scenarios and SO (when it runs). The MA doesn't hold much interest after all this time. Sooo... what's that got to do with anything? Don't like what I say so question my right to say it?

I think you fancy yourself as to much of a deep thinker....my question was simple...just wondered if you ever played AH...haven't seen you up in a long time.

Don't worry my young little pal....as you age and mature, you'll calm down a bit... just remember, not all of your assumptions and opinions carry the weight you think they do....remember, Rude loves ya:)