« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Author Topic: So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?  (Read 2373 times)

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #60 on: June 02, 2003, 05:58:59 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by aztec
The part of the Iraq war that was bad was all the loudmouth, know it all, blowhards who came here every day to give their views on it.


Hell, if that's the only part that was bad, let's do'er again!

Fire it up boys, Yee Haw!
« Last Edit: June 02, 2003, 06:04:02 AM by Holden McGroin »
Logged
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #61 on: June 02, 2003, 06:15:49 AM »
I am not trolling Gscholz...

BTW Gscholz why did you choose a troll caricature with a large nose, hairy beard and large ears, that smacks of nazi anti-semitic propaganda posters, care to explain yourself?  And the "troll" is  even portrayed as preying on a virtuous German families by wrecking their hard won BMW car - shame on you Gscholz!!!  :)
« Last Edit: June 02, 2003, 06:19:01 AM by GRUNHERZ »
Logged

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #62 on: June 02, 2003, 08:00:01 AM »
"The part of the Iraq war that was bad was all the loudmouth, know it all, blowhards who came here every day to give their views on it."

I hear ya in one regard: it's just painful to listen to these guy's opinions. Mine are the only ones worth paying attention to, natch, so if you had put everyone but me on ignore you'd have been in fine shape. I guess you didn't read the memo.

Erhm but seriously... War being what it is these days, and this here being a UBB and all, it kinda goes without saying that there's gonna be some discussion. If they had Solitaire built into the board somehow I'd probably be doing that. Until then we're left with the blowhards and their musings.

The characterizations "loudmouth" and "blowhard" are directly and inversely proportional to the degree with which you happen to agree with what's being said. It's extremely hard for a lefty communist bastard to win the love and respect of all of his peers in this joint, that's for sure.

WooT! I just spent 5 minutes typing.... NOTHING. All of it horse****, for no other reason than to... well, for absolutely no reason whatsoever. Why the hell did I just do that? I must be one of them blowhards! :D
« Last Edit: June 02, 2003, 08:06:23 AM by Nash »
Logged

Offline bounder

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
      • http://www.332viking.com
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #63 on: June 02, 2003, 08:07:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Yes avoiding neccessaary military confrontations for the sake of domestic economic concerns has always been a decision..

Peace in our Times!!!!  :rolleyes:


Well it seems to me, that from the time of Henry V and before, starting a war on foreign soil was always a first class method of promoting national unity and taking peoples' eyes off troubling trends at home.

Still works today!
Logged

Offline bounder

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
      • http://www.332viking.com
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #64 on: June 02, 2003, 08:12:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
I am not trolling Gscholz...

BTW Gscholz why did you choose a troll caricature with a large nose, hairy beard and large ears


Because that is what a troll looks like, you tard =)
Quote

that smacks of nazi anti-semitic propaganda posters, care to explain yourself?  

Oh you mean the famous one of the Jewish man dangling the jewish boy over the bridge to catch a fish?
Quote

And the "troll" is  even portrayed as preying on a virtuous German families by wrecking their hard won BMW car - shame on you Gscholz!!!  :) [/B]

That's not a BMW proper, its an ersatz BMW aka the 'British' Rover 400 - no wonder it got flattened.
Logged

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #65 on: June 02, 2003, 08:19:28 AM »
Quote
Oh you mean the famous one of the Jewish man dangling the jewish boy over the bridge to catch a fish?


Oh course it's anti-semitic. Hitler had it tattoed on his left testicle which, incidentally, resides in the Albert Hall.

Grunherz has an authentic signed sketch of it with all his other 'memorabilia'. :D
Logged
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline aztec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1800
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #66 on: June 02, 2003, 08:48:05 AM »
ROFL, why yes you are Nash, however recognition is the first step on the way to recovery.;)
Logged

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #67 on: June 02, 2003, 09:26:37 AM »
The international community and organisations now has to spend years and lots of money to clean up all the undetonated cluster munitions that the US and Britain droppede on iraq. :rolleyes:

It is already killing and mutelating alot of children in iraq and it is estimated that it will do more damage than the iraqi regime would have spent years doing.

WTG ! :mad:
Logged

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #68 on: June 02, 2003, 11:46:33 AM »
I donno bounder, I still think Gscholz is a nazi. ;)

Dowding, you wish you had the same - dont be hatin... :D
Logged

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #69 on: June 02, 2003, 11:51:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen10
The international community and organisations now has to spend years and lots of money to clean up all the undetonated cluster munitions that the US and Britain droppede on iraq. :rolleyes:

It is already killing and mutelating alot of children in iraq and it is estimated that it will do more damage than the iraqi regime would have spent years doing.

WTG ! :mad:


Right, the USA is still killing more iraqis than Saddam.....

Why cant you impotent europeans just accept the joyous fact that we wiped out yet another terrible dictatorship from the face of the earth - you didnt seem to complain the last three timesamerica did it in europe...

Or are you gonna say that the USA killed more than hitler ever would have or killed more than the USSR...
Logged

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #70 on: June 02, 2003, 12:28:27 PM »
The UN has deployed BLIX to Texas to look for stolen Oil Caches.
Logged

Offline Syzygyone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #71 on: June 02, 2003, 12:58:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen10
The international community and organisations now has to spend years and lots of money to clean up all the undetonated cluster munitions that the US and Britain droppede on iraq. :rolleyes:

It is already killing and mutelating alot of children in iraq and it is estimated that it will do more damage than the iraqi regime would have spent years doing.

WTG ! :mad:


Could we have a source for this accusation please?  I haven't seen anything in any media on it.
Logged

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
So, which part of the Iraq war was bad again?
« Reply #72 on: June 02, 2003, 02:08:27 PM »
It will reach you to eventually i guess.

One link from The Observer, if you google you will find lots more:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Observer/documents/2003/05/31/landmines2.pdf

Not an accusation, its called fact.

The british minister of defence last week for the first time admitted that they had used cluster munitions against populated areas. Adam Ingram had to admit this to the BBC and that the use of those weapons against sivillians is illegal.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2003, 02:14:31 PM by Nilsen »
Logged

Offline Syzygyone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
OK
« Reply #73 on: June 02, 2003, 02:34:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen10
It will reach you to eventually i guess.

One link from The Observer, if you google you will find lots more:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Observer/documents/2003/05/31/landmines2.pdf

Not an accusation, its called fact.

The british minister of defence last week for the first time admitted that they had used cluster munitions against populated areas. Adam Ingram had to admit this to the BBC and that the use of those weapons against sivillians is illegal.


Okay, thanks. I'll check it out.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Up
« previous next »