Author Topic: SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?  (Read 1125 times)

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« on: May 25, 2003, 09:22:02 PM »
LoL i only have an antena, I wanna ask which method is supperior.

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2003, 09:57:38 PM »
I've heard that it may depend on where you're located, but in my experience (in my area) Satellite beats Digital Cable by a mile.  I won't go into specifics (do a search if you want some, it's all been posted before), but I thought it was better because of the cost, the quality of the equipment, the speed of the interface, the usability of the interface, speed of channel surfing, picture quality, and the customer service.


SOB

-edit- and you can ignore the commercials from the cable idiots that talk down the reception.  It rains 3/4 of the year here in Oregon, and I had great reception with both DirecTV and Dish Network through every kind of rain imaginable, as well as hail and a very rare thunderstorm or two.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2003, 10:02:40 PM by SOB »
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline Pfunk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1308
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2003, 10:00:35 PM »
Well in my area "digital cable" is a myth.  In all actuality it is the exact same analog signal with a neat little onscreen menu option.  HBO, Showtime, etc broadcast in dolby digital however in this area we cannot get that audio stream.  The quality of the signal is the exact same as your typical analog cable broadcast.  Satellite on the other hand has more programming options and has a far superior truely digital signal.  With satellite you can still get your local channels, $5 a month if i remember correctly, Dish and DirectTV do not require you to purchase their equipment however you usually have to "rent" it from them.  This means that you will be entering into a year long contract which has steep early termination fines.  You can purchase your own equipment to avoid this contract, however depending on how many TV's you want to hook up it can get quite expensive. For a dual antenna receiver expect to pay at least $150, with each additional box of $99 last time i checked.  My advice is go with satellite and shop around DISH and DirectTV are highly competitive and have greats deals practically all the time.  My father is a Comcast cable customer and he got a offer the other day from DISH that included a DishPVR system(kinda like TIVO) with 2 additional receivers, Americas Top 100 programming, free installation for $60/month with a $49 credit for the first 3 months of service.  Now this is the only deal I have seen where he can cancel at anytime, keep the equipment, and not have to pay early termination fees.  One hell of a deal if you ask me, but this deal was sent to him to lure him away from Comcast, so I do not know if it would be available to anyone.  Good Luck in your decision

Offline OIO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2003, 10:04:10 PM »
satellite usually offers you more channels for the same price.

Cable oth, 100% guarantees your signal.

With sat. tv, bad weather or lots of crap can make your signal stop in frame, jump and be very jerky.

I have directv now, i love it, but theres nothing more annoying than taping your show and having the signal scramble and screech because a plane flew over your house or a bird took a crap on the dish or because there's bad weather between you and the satellite. Cable OTH never loses signal unless you got a rat chewing your cabling.

Offline Pfunk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1308
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2003, 10:28:33 PM »
Found a good deal for dish network here


http://www.vmcsatellite.com/channels/home.cfm

Offline Mighty1

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1161
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2003, 10:49:31 PM »
I have had satellite for over 6 years and found it to be a lot better than cable.

Satellite for internet is another story.......it sucks!
I have been reborn a new man!

Notice I never said a better man.

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2003, 11:11:21 PM »
I've had DishNetwork for 5 years and would never go cable again. The only upside to cable is internet.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Mini D

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6897
      • Fat Drunk Bastards
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2003, 11:28:32 PM »
If you have a HDTV get satellite.

MiniD

Offline Pfunk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1308
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2003, 11:30:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mini D
If you have a HDTV get satellite.

MiniD


I highly doubt he has HDTV seeing as he is currently using rabbit ears for reception.

Offline Dinger

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1705
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2003, 12:19:02 AM »
I've had digital cable.  Here's the skinny:
Digital cable is a costly technology, and the cable company's business plan involves delivering more content at increased customer cost.

How much content?
Well, okay -- it comes through the same cable as everything else.  So there's no sense reduplicating the analog channels.  The stuff on the "bottom 63" or however many analog channels you currently can get with your cable box will remain the same.

Then there are the digital channels, with some cool features, like audio compression applied (or not) by the cable box, not by the transmitter.  So if you've got a home theater, that's neat.

Every digital cable box communicates with the central office (some units have a phone jack for this purpose).  The central office can then turn on or off individual digital channels.
Usually, this means that, for your basic digital fee, you get a few more channels, mostly crap you wouldn't want.  Then you can spend extra money a month on "packages" that give you additional channels and maybe a premium service like HBO.  If you want to spend $7 for one of four movies of the sort they have 40 copies of down at blockbuster, but without all that worrying about rewinding (or pausing, or watching again), you can look at pay per view (sucker!).

The box itself is usually owned by the cable company; so like a satellite system, you need a receiver to get the digital channels.


remember that cable companies also offer a "broadcast basic" service  (That's what I "stepped down" from digital cable to).  Where I am, I pay $16/month and get the broadcast channels, plus C-spans and crappy home shopping and public access channels (and WGN).  And I suspect my local cable company believes the extra $30 they charge for the other analog channels goes directly to the cable networks, and thus no profit for them.  I suspect this because when I shifted down -- a year and a half ago -- they didn't think it profitable to put a filter on the other cable channels.
Speaking to the guy who cuts my hair (and who has satellite), it turns out I'm not the only broadcast basic subscriber with this "feature": throughout this city, apparently, the cable company is giving us $16/month losers the fifty dollar package.

 Still, if I had to pay for it, I'd go broadcast basic and satellite.
And I'd get the one with football and baseball dammit.  DirectTV is the only one out there with the NFL contract (and presumably the only one with the MLB contract).

Offline Nifty

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4400
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2003, 09:32:00 AM »
SOB's right, it really depends on where you are if digital cable is worth anything.  Here it blows.  I don't know if it's the signal or the receiver they give you, but the picture quality on the digital signal sucked the big one.  Dark colors would wash out, and it really detracted from the viewing experience.  Over in Tampa supposedly, it's a really good service (Eagler has mentioned he is really pleased with his service there.)

Personally, I have DirecTV and the cable company supplies my local channels and my internet access.  I actually pay the same price for local channels and internet than I would for just internet because if you're a TV subscriber they give you a break on the internet service.  The break happens to be the same price as the basic service.  I pay a little more cuz of taxes and fees of course, but it's better than dealing with rabbit ears.  :)
proud member of the 332nd Flying Mongrels, noses in the wind since 1997.

Offline Ike 2K#

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2003, 12:20:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nifty
SOB's right, it really depends on where you are if digital cable is worth anything.  Here it blows.  I don't know if it's the signal or the receiver they give you, but the picture quality on the digital signal sucked the big one.  Dark colors would wash out, and it really detracted from the viewing experience.  Over in Tampa supposedly, it's a really good service (Eagler has mentioned he is really pleased with his service there.)


I heard that my friend uses RCA connectors to get better picture. I notice that anolog channels sucks (in quality) with digital cable

Offline Sox62

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1159
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2003, 03:14:25 PM »
If you plan on using your satellite service for your ISP,be aware of the lag issue.

Your ping will be no less than 240-speed of light being the determining factor.

Offline Dinger

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1705
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2003, 03:50:45 PM »
yeah, you shouldn't be using channel 3 out of the cable box.  Use RCA or S-Video or component out

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18837
SATELITTE VS DIGITAL CABLE..... which one is better?
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2003, 09:00:08 PM »
digital cable, hdtv, video on demand, hbo on demand, adult on demand, PPV, road runner hispeed - tampa bay  division cable is what other cable systems strive to be. should be, Time warner dumped a ton of money into it. sats go out in the rain around here, but they have great pix when it doesn't rain
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder