Sorry for the language but i am not native english.
I just read the other thread and the comments about other flight sim such as FA and would like to make one single comment about that.
I think I'm qualified to give my opinion since I have certain professional reasons to play all the main related simulators including AH, WB, FA, WW2OL, IL2, MOH ... i played/tested them all. I am very tired of hearing all the "we are good they are bad comments" between the different game communities. Ask the FA crowd what they think about AH and you get the same type of answers, very often from people that "used" to play the other game and try to come out as "experts". They all have their good and bad points, even AH. What's important is to play something that has a high fun-factor for you personally.
I do understand that this is an AH forum and without any doubt, my humble oppinion, AH1 is one of the best (at this time) pure combat flight simulators but that depends on who you ask. You can not do a real apple-to-apple comparison between FA and AH as it attract different type of players. I like them both for different reasons. However if you do so i would say that FA offers a more differntiated game platform with better graphics (even compared to AH2) and strategic game play i.e. more choice as a player. AH offers a signifcantly larger and important "sim" community for people that likes realistic FM. FA do lacks the numbers in the advanced rooms for people that likes that, but it all depends on what you want and like. If you want realistic FM with more air without the hordes that is OK if not well AH is a very good choice. In the end it is the fun factor for you personally and what you like that state what is best and most fun for you.
The comment about the FA's userbase is wrong as it is actually growing. Maybe not incredible fast but believe me i know ( i am not a Jaleco employee). Jaleco also seems to have a solid marketing and development plan for the future as do HiTech. The WB crowd also seem willing to take up a serious fight with AH and do not forget the IL2's and WW2OL. An interesting question is how many WW2 "flight" related sims can coexists and what is the differentiators between them? Currently I would say that both WW2OL has the biggest growth rate but that changes from day to day. Given the situation and the recent price changes maybe WB has a big growth at the moment.
I always recomend people to try out the different games and see if you like it. A very good thing with competition is that most games offers either demo missions or free time to test the games. We as players can choose. I do fly FA advanced rooms now and then and i do not have the same experience with terrible lag but that is me. At the same time i, compared to many others, find the lvl-5 rooms to much arcadish for me but quite fun now and then.
At this point i am flying AH (waiting for AH2) and combine it with WW2OL for the land war. If I get burned out on WW2OL then fly AH , when ya get tired of AH I switch back to WW2. I will also starting to seriously test COD very soon. Saying that i do like WW2OL FM but not the plane set.
I think what most of us have in common is a love of WW2 history, computer games and playing with a massively multiplayer community, both AH and FA offer this in their own way. The "massively multiplayer" is a "big" drawback with the current Il2 implementation but they will eventually get there as well resulting in even more competition.
Which is better? I don't think that's a valid question since the answer depends on so many individual variables, I like many, I fly in AH, FA, IL2 and WB3 and am really good at the ground war in WW2OL, but again i have a professional reason to do all of them (and more).
I think bashing either game is petty and superficial and it only makes the one bashing look bad. All games have a vibrant community and dedicated developer/support.
Try it and make your own decision, getting an objective answer here is hard....

...and now i expect some serious flaming
