Author Topic: PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII  (Read 9942 times)

Offline Sakai

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #165 on: July 18, 2003, 07:17:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by twist9000
yes i agree the i-16 is a good fighter :)  only thing is that you already have russian planes and if memory serves me correctly the russians supplied several to spain to fight in the civil war so why not have spanish markings on them and add a to the currentl number of flyable countries planes it's just a thought but maybe it could happen lol but i think the debate goes on over which fighter we will see personally i hope both make it cause i wont know which one to fly!


The earlier I-16, great idea.  Later I-16s carried 2x20mms and rockets and were a tad more eastern front.

Sakai
"The P-40B does all the work for you . . ."

Offline bigred

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #166 on: July 18, 2003, 10:54:17 AM »
Here's my Japanese planeset wishlist.

Its a modified version of my old squad's WB3 wish list.  Asterisks mark the ones we REALLY need for historical scenarios, ect...


Realy Early war:

A5m4 "Claude" (open cockpit, predecesor to the zero)
G3M2 "Nell" (bomber)

Early-Mid War:

Ki-43 Hayabusa (most common army fighter)*
Ki-45 Toryu (Army Jabo, twin engined, common)*
G4M "Betty" (bomber)*

Mid war:
Ki-44 Shoki (interceptor)
H8K "Emily" (uber flying boat)
B6N Tenzan (replaced the kate, much improved)
D4Y Suisei (replaced the Val, much improved)

Late War:

Ki-84 Hayate (nuff said)*
Ki-100 (perked, maybe)


That should round it out nicely ;)

-bigred

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #167 on: July 18, 2003, 04:45:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by twist9000
why not have spanish markings on them  



Because Spain didn't fight in WW2...



Ack-Ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Beans101

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #168 on: July 19, 2003, 03:02:09 AM »
:) :) :) OK GUYS:) :) :)

     I think the P-39 would b a great idea, but y not make it so it can stand up to later version planes and go with the P-63 instead.  Basically the same plane, but instead has a larger more powerful engine and better armament!!!!!!!!!!!

      Just something to think about b4 u guys all get ur mind set on the P-39.  BUT.... the P-39 would b a great addition to AH i think!!!

<> Beans101 OUT!!!

P.S.  Please leave feedback on why u guys hate my oppinion etc...

Offline Xjazz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #169 on: July 19, 2003, 03:10:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by BNM
Brewster Buffalo please...




and I-16 Rata :)

Offline bigjava

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 220
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #170 on: July 19, 2003, 03:53:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Holder3



Italian
Cant 1007 torpedo bomber
Re-2000
Mc-200
CR-42 (biplane fighter)

 


I LOVE U!!! :cool:

....and  i have to add...
re 2005
 
fiat G50 (finnish flag)


Fiat G55
« Last Edit: July 19, 2003, 04:07:18 AM by bigjava »

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #171 on: July 19, 2003, 04:09:55 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Because Spain didn't fight in WW2...

Ack-Ack


Did it fight in the  .... ahem ...

[size=12]
Spanish
Civil
War?
[/color][/size]

(Which some call the opening shots or prelude to the European WWII theater)


Spanish Civil War! Uberbipes! Dogfight heaven! This is a good thing! It's time has come! Better hurry! Before it's too late. SCW good! Fun stuff! And it's educational! And chocked fulla vitamins and nutrients that are good for your brain! Viva Espania! Hey, there cute seniorita! I come to save you from the bootheels of the Fascists! Got any vino? Maybe a private room? :D

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #172 on: July 19, 2003, 05:38:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
I'm reading the "Allied Fighters of World War II" also by Bill Gunston. It states that the service delivery of the VK-107 engined Yak-3's as "no later than January 1944".

 


I also have this book and its wrong...........


No yak 3's flew in 1943...... the Yak 1M was under development from  thru 42 and Yakovlev wanted to put the cumulation of this work into the Yak 3 then fitted with VK 105. However this work did not take place and the then current Yak 1 went under continous upgrade all the way thru to mid 44.

Other lessons learnt from the Yak 1M were also applied to the Yak 9 variants which were being developed from the Yak 7 which inturn was really a development of an Early Yak 1 trainer.

Development on the Yak 1 m was picked up again in 43 ( It became a sort of development tool) and cumulated in October 43 as an instruction to tool production for the final model then to be designated the Yak3. But the 1st Yak 3 left production for the front in March 44.

Where as the final war time version (April 44) of the heavier Yak 9 (the Yak 9U) did have the  VK 107 the Yak 3 did not.

Two  early pre production Yak 3's were made to test them with the VK 107.......these tests were conducted through out 44 but early and continued engine problems decided that the Yak 3 be put into production with the VK 105.........infact the VK 105 PF2 with augmented 2nd stage of its supercharger was also an engine development of the Yak 1m at which time the engine was sub coded the M 105PF-2.

The Yak 9U VK 107 was dogged with engine problems thru out 44 and many of these were only solved in early 45.
Ludere Vincere

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #173 on: July 19, 2003, 05:42:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
The Yak-3 had one purpose in mind when it was built and that was to beat the FW190D-9 and something it did quite well since below 16,000ft it was faster and more maneuverable than the Dora.


Ack-Ack


Yak 3 preceded the D9 by a considerable period..
Ludere Vincere

Offline muckmaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #174 on: July 19, 2003, 09:31:35 AM »
Game over man....

People at the con are reporting no new planes will be added to AH2.

Offline Beans101

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #175 on: July 20, 2003, 04:11:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
Game over man....

People at the con are reporting no new planes will be added to AH2.


:mad: :mad: IF THIS IS TRUE IM GUNNA B REALLY TICKED OFF:mad: :mad:

But dont get to any conclusions until i find out more!!

<> Beans101 OUT!!

Offline WestyAH

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #176 on: July 20, 2003, 09:08:20 AM »
No new planes? Ever?  What's the whole scoop?

 Are the plans basically for porting the AH aircraft into AH-II first and then progressing from there?

 I could not fathom HTC not working on and including additional aircraft into AH-II in the near term (after AH II/TOD goes into payed production) unless they're intending on branching out into another genre (I don't put any stock into that at all) or are losing staff (certainly hope not).

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #177 on: July 20, 2003, 09:32:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
Game over man....

People at the con are reporting no new planes will be added to AH2.


Must be drunk_MAW and I'm_On_Crack_MAW. ;)

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #178 on: July 21, 2003, 11:56:30 AM »
Ack-Ack,

Some late production F6F-5s did have 20mm cannon.  The barrels of these inboard weapons did not protrude for any great length beyond the edge of the wing, as did the 20mms of the F6F-5N.  They were recessed closer to the wing edge just as the inboard .50 calibers had been.  The barrels of the two outboard .50 calibers were flush with the edge of the wing.  I am uncertain as to how much action these aircraft saw, however I do know that they were flown by Naval Reserve pilots for a few years after the end of the war.  

By the way, I have some Grumman engineering data, courtesy of F4UDOA, that gives the lie to long-held belief that the -5 Hellcat's top speed was only 380 mph.  This data was published in March of 1945.

At a fighter-normal weight of 11,694 lbs.  the -5 could reach a top speed of 401mph using war emergency power at its critical altitude of 20,000 feet.

Tests run by Chance-Vought of the Hellcat also indicated that it could exceed 400mph in level flight.

Naval Air Intelligence conducted tests with a -5 Hellcat against a Zero 52 and then published the results for use by our pilots fighting in the Pacific.  Top speed for the Hellcat they used, which must have been in superb condition, was 409 mph.

I wish AH would use these statistics to tweak the fm of the Hellcat.

Regards, Shuckins

Offline bfreek

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
PLANES U WOULD LIKE TO C IN AHII
« Reply #179 on: July 23, 2003, 08:17:52 PM »
oh but for a perfect world