« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Name This...(539)  (Read 418 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(539)
« on: June 14, 2003, 03:55:59 PM »
???




Logged

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
Name This...(539)
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2003, 04:37:57 PM »
PT-109? :)
Logged

Offline jjdude

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 100
Name This...(539)
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2003, 07:01:21 PM »
hmm... is it pt-1?
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6865
Re: Name This...(539)
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2003, 07:51:11 PM »
An 80' Elco boat, PT131.

Photo can be found in "Allied Coastal Forces of WW2" Vol.2 pg228

ISBN 1-55750-035-5
Logged

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Name This...(539)
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2003, 08:45:40 PM »
Those torps look ... short.
Logged
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Drunky

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2017
Name This...(539)
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2003, 09:50:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
Those torps look ... short.



It's not the length of the torp...it's how you use it :D
Logged
Drunky | SubGenius
Fat Drunk Bastards
B.A.A.H. - Black Association of Aces High

Offline Shiva

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 966
      • http://members.cox.net/srmalloy/
Name This...(539)
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2003, 11:53:01 PM »
You can see from the picture that the PT boat in AH is badly undermodelled -- we need to lobby HiTech to add the waist guns ASAP...   ;)
Logged

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Name This...(539)
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2003, 12:36:11 AM »
LOL! Drunky :D
Logged
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline bigsky

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 964
Name This...(539)
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2003, 04:44:40 AM »
its a late war version of pt boat. possibly built by higgins of louisiana, but those are aircraft torps. they were far more reliable than than sub torps. those torps didnt have the same problems with the detonators. and you just got the props on them spinning and kick them overboard. sub torps had a black powder based firing system on the early war boats.
Logged
"I am moist like bacon"

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Name This...(539)
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2003, 10:54:32 AM »
and we need that radar!
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6865
Name This...(539)
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2003, 11:08:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by bigsky
its a late war version of pt boat. possibly built by higgins of louisiana, but those are aircraft torps. they were far more reliable than than sub torps.


The hull of the Elco PT131 was laid down 3.6.42, launched 26.8.42 and in service 9.9.42.
Logged

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(539)
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2003, 01:22:21 PM »
PT 131, it is:)

     

  The Fitting of PT's (in the Pacific, and to a lesser extent Europe) with a ton of guns was do to the fat that were used for barge busting more and more during the war, they actual sank very few Surface ships, and late in the war it was not uncommon for them to not even cary torp's.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »