Author Topic: Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter  (Read 513 times)

Offline leonid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« on: November 17, 1999, 05:31:00 AM »
Looking at each fighter in the 'vs. any' category for Beta Tour #2, the ranking is as follows (by Kill to Death ratio):

1. La-5FN 534:354(1.51:1)
2. N1K2 1641:1318(1.25:1)
3. Spitfire IX 2835:2416(1.17:1)
4. Fw 190A-8 2526:2184(1.16:1)
5. P-51D 2539:2473(1.03:1)
6. Bf 109G-10 679:834(1:1.23)

Of course, the tour is far from over, but for now the La-5FN takes the crown.  Not bad for a 1943 aircraft.  So, HTC, when is the La-7 due???    

One thing noted was the serious drop in usage of the Bf 109G-10.  Compared to last tour it appears that about half of the messer pilots have since moved to other aircraft.  My guess is they are now trying the Fw 190A-8, but that is pure conjecture.

Addendum: Oops!  Thanks to Phantom121 for first pointing out these stats.
 

------------------
129 IAP VVS RKKA




[This message has been edited by leonid (edited 11-17-1999).]
ingame: Raz

Offline Minotaur

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 1999, 08:02:00 AM »
Leonid;

I have a question.

Are deaths just from A2A kills or do all deaths, take off crashes, Ack etc, add into your deaths number?

You would think that if you added all the kills for all the planes, that would equal all the deaths for all the planes, for A2A only.

Interesting stats.

Mino

[This message has been edited by Minotaur (edited 11-17-1999).]

Offline leonid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 1999, 08:17:00 AM »
Minotaur,
I think it only refers to A2A deaths.  If it included crashes and chutes not opening in time, there would be an aweful lot of arbitrary scoring.

------------------
129 IAP VVS RKKA


ingame: Raz

Offline Minotaur

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 1999, 08:32:00 AM »
Somthing is missing then.

Strictly A2A, total kills should equal total deaths.

Mino

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 1999, 08:54:00 AM »
You are right, they may have made an assumption or error around same type kills.
But they are missing 1200 deaths somewhere.
I think that the LA5 is the only plane I havnt been killed by in Beta 2 exept the 47.
Must be active on the Rook-Bishop front.
I think that the plane is fine but the cudos go to the guys at the wheel.
Doesnt that mean a LA5 kill should count for 50% more points?

Offline Phantom121

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 1999, 02:20:00 PM »
I am no expert but have spent a few hours reviewing stats. Specific type vs Specific type are equal i.e. 109 vs spit is the same as spit vs 109 (except reversed) and seem to only indicate A2A shootdowns (not deaths).  The problem with ANY is that it contains all targets including bombers, C47's, chutes, etc.  But there are some obvious problems in scoring as chutes has a high number of "kill" which is realistically not possible.

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 1999, 03:09:00 PM »
 
Quote
One thing noted was the serious drop in usage of the Bf 109G-10. Compared to last tour it appears that about half of the messer pilots have since moved to other aircraft.
Or it could be(probably)that the 109 cockpit is like being in a cave now with the total lack of lighting. I`ve pretty much decided it`s worthless at this point. Really sad that one of the best fighters of WW II gets a disadvantage like this.

------------------
}]
 JG2 "Richthofen"



Offline Swager

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1352
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 1999, 04:00:00 PM »
The new dweeb plane that takes place of the spit!!

------------------
Damn Ghostrider!  This bogey is all over me!!
Rock:  Ya see that Ensign, lighting the cigarette?
Powell: Yes Rock.
Rock: Well that's where I got it, he's my son.
Powell: Really Rock, well I'd like to meet him.
Rock:  No ya wouldn't.

Offline Wardog

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 206
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 1999, 05:28:00 PM »
not surprised,since it is the most flown plane along with the Spit..



------------------
--wd-- Jagdgeschwader 26 "Schlageter"
            "The Abbeville Boys"
         
           



Offline leonid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 1999, 07:04:00 AM »
By looking at the kill stats for the various aircraft one can easily see which planes are flown the most(from most frequent to least):

1. Spitfire IX
2. P-51D
3. Fw 190A-8
4. N1K2
5. Bf 109G-10
6. La-5FN


------------------
129 IAP VVS RKKA


ingame: Raz

-kier-

  • Guest
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 1999, 08:04:00 AM »
Here is my ranking of aircraft, in order from hardest to easiest, to get kills in (my very unprofessional opinion, agree or don't   ):

1. C47
2. Chute
3. La5FN
4. 109G10
5. FW190A8
6. P51D
7. N1K2J
8. Spitfire IX
9. B17G


The hardest vehicle to survive in, from hardest to easiest:

1. C47
2. Chute
3. B17G
4. N1k2J
5. FW190A8
6. 109G10
7. Spitfire IX
8. La5FN
9. P51D

Of course these rankings reflect my style of flying, your mileage may vary.

[This message has been edited by -kier- (edited 11-18-1999).]

Offline Flathat

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 1999, 08:46:00 AM »
I'm pretty much in agreement with your list, -kier-. The 'Stang is the most survivable ride in the arena, as long as you've got a dinosaur hide for the inevitable cries of 'Runstang!'

I had a lovely time last night, even though it was only 1 sortie. Took off from f1, originally intending to head directly to f7 or 8, whichever that northeast field in the Bishopric is. I was clawing my way up past 17,000 at about 150 IAS when I saw a high dot to the north. Pushed the manifold from 55 in. to 60 and kept climbing. Turned out to be an FW, so I hauled off to keep the range open and grab some more alt over my field (so now I'm an ack hugging Runstang dweeb, it's better than becoming a Wurger Burger(tm)*   ). Then I see (angelic choir) clouds, beautiful clouds[/i] at about 20,000 off to the west. I look around, the FW is gone but now there's another dot near the clouds, so I head over that way to investigate.

Never do find that dot, but spend a great couple of minutes carving through and around the cloudpeaks. Very disorienting when the screen goes completely grey outside the cockpit (might be due to my sub-minimal home system). I've never done IFR, so I just geeeently get the nose pointed up (according to the clinometer) until I can see again. This happens about four times until I'm clear of the cloud formation.

By then I'm well west of my intended destination, but the map shows nme activity all along the front so I climb to 26,400, drop manifold to 45# and head east to patrol along the southern edge of the mountain range. Nothing nothing nothing, about 60 gallons in the drop tank. Finally I see a dot on my low 8, so I roll to investigate. Once I'm on a southwesterly heading I check 6 (I don't like having my back to the front   ) and sure enough, there's a lone-wolf B17 back there, approximately co-alt. Manifold back to 60#, dump the tank and turn back to the north.

Still just a dot, but from the way the range is dropping I estimate we're on closing vectors. Good enough, the 10/4 or 2/8 pass is what I want. Start my dive around 2.4, manifold back, he's managed to turn on me. Oh well, in I go anyway. The 17 driver (smitty) did an excellent job keeping me in his rear arc on my passes; I just couldn't line up the "shoulder" run I wanted. That and typical over-eagerness hurt my gunnery. He pinged me up pretty good but luckily there was no significant damage. Down to my last 60 rounds and now there's a Spit coming hard, co-alt from the northwest. He's a ways away so I've got time for one more run. I blow the rest of my ammo, roll inverted and split-s the heck out of there. Smitty and I compared notes, and I got his right waist gunner. As many times as he pinged me (he was definitely a better shot, at least on this sortie), it's a minor miracle I got out intact.

Finally set down at F4 with about 1/8 tank left. I came in a little hot (about 180) but with full flaps, minimum RPM and idle manifold. Greased her down nicely but went off the end of the runway, so it went as a ditch.

I'll tell you whut, Boomhower...I'd give up Dawn of Aces for Aces High if I had to decide right now...even more so if there were the ghost of an indication that HTC intends to tackle WWI at some point in the future....

------------------
Flathat
'Black Dahlia'
No10 RNAS "The Black Flight"
Angel on your wing, devil on your tail

*Wurger Burger(tm)--What you become when you engage an FW from a position of gross disadvantage when you don't have to and really should know better anyway.  



[This message has been edited by Flathat (edited 11-18-1999).]

-kier-

  • Guest
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 1999, 09:14:00 AM »
Dawn of Aces? What's that?  

Yes, iEN already provided me with the "12-step" program for that addiction. I can sadly say I'm cured of it completely. Amazing what 3 weeks of non-connectability can do for you...

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 1999, 10:37:00 AM »
Kier: Actually 109G10 is most survivable of all these planes.

109 vs P51:
Accerlation
Climb rate
Faster at low altitudes, only a bit slower than p51 at higher, but accerlation wins with that.

Easier to break out of fight in 109, than in p51, even if low on E.
P51 forced to run or die against 109

109 vs spit:
Faster
Accerlation
Climb rate

1 vs 1 with spit would end into spits death
Cant really try to run in spit from 109

-kier-

  • Guest
Beta Tour #2: No.1 Fighter
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 1999, 10:45:00 AM »
Fishu-

I might agree on the survivability issue to a point, but as far as the maneuverability 109 vs. anything... well, I haven't seen it. I think it is a toss-up against the 51, but the  Spit will win most the encounters with the 109, even with the 109's climb and acceleration. You may very well be the exceptional 109 pilot I haven't seen yet!