Author Topic: Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...  (Read 2131 times)

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #60 on: June 26, 2003, 06:50:46 PM »
Okay first of all... If you can't see that the little dialogue I came up with was a joke, a play on the the meaning of "burried" and how, when the orders to burry the nuke program got passed down they morphed to the point where this scientist mistakenly ended up burrying a part in his rose garden.... then there's no hope.

Actually... you did take that seriously didn't you Grun? Mmmph.

Now about this hibernation theory - I've already addressed that. You say they were hiding it for some point in the future. All I'm saying is that it wasn't until just recently when some half a million troops landed on the outskirts of his country were inspectors allowed back in. There were years when he was free to do whatever he wanted, and he didn't do a thing. The scientist wasn't ordered to dig up that piece. The program wasn't started back up again. Okay? If they were waiting, what were they waiting for?

But this brings me to MY question.... kay Grun? You wanna answer this for me finally?

If this peice was burried and the scientist was at home all day watching Dr. Phil along with the rest of 'em.... What exactly did Bush see that would convince him that Iraq was months away from building a nuke? We know he didn't see any evidence of a nuke program because we know there in fact was NOT a nuke program. So why did he say there was?
« Last Edit: June 26, 2003, 06:54:51 PM by Nash »

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #61 on: June 26, 2003, 06:56:52 PM »
"Ok well if you READ the article Grun you'd know that Hussein didn't order the scientist to burry the part. Hussein's SON did. For all we know Hussein had no IDEA that this part was still around.

Imagine this:

Husein to son: Well that's it. We gotta kill the nuke program.

Son to Hussein: Are you serious? But DAD!

Husein to son: I'm sorry Qusay but's that's it. The program is over. Burry it.

 

In any event, it was the son-in-law Qusay that ordered the parts burried, not Hussein. That takes care of your question Grun. And yours Nuke. "

Joke or no joke in the middle part,  the message is claear you think Saddam was trustworthy and had no intention to rebild his nuklear progarm and that makes you an idiot. You know you are like those Stalin or Hitler apologists - If only the Fuhrer knew - they all said...  Why this overwhelming need on your part to belevie that Saddam is trustworthy.


As for the Iraq war I am 100% behind it there were many reasons why it was the right thing to do and a good thing to do after 12 years on Saddams bull****.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #62 on: June 26, 2003, 07:32:29 PM »
LOL... and we're back to you sayin', in essence, "screw it... don't bother me with the facts, I aint answering yer question, I am 100% behind this war, so take a hike."

Calling me some sort of Hitler apologist is a classic.

See ya Grun.

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #63 on: June 26, 2003, 08:20:05 PM »
Quote
If this peice was burried and the scientist was at home all day watching Dr. Phil along with the rest of 'em.... What exactly did Bush see that would convince him that Iraq was months away from building a nuke? We know he didn't see any evidence of a nuke program because we know there in fact was NOT a nuke program. So why did he say there was?


If there was no nuke program, how come that scientist had to be taken out of Iraq for his safety before he was identified? Why would he have to fear anything if there was no nuke program......after all it was only a centrifuge, no big deal to anyone.

And btw, how do you know for a fact there was no nuke program? And when did Bush say Iraq was months away from building a nuke?

What about the UN saying Iraq had  wmd? It wasn't just Bush Nash, it was the UN. You do remember the UN's resolutions right? Are you just upset that Bush enforced the UN resolutions instead of letting Iraq get away with whatever it wanted?

Its funny to me to hear this new argument about Bush lying to the world about Iraq's wmd. You know before the war the main argument was that Bush wouldnt let inspectors have more time and was "going it alone"  , never mentioned Bush was lying about wmd. In fact most of the world agreed Iraq probably had some wmd and banned weapons. The UN said Iraq must comply and said they had not been complying with it's resolutions to prove it had disarmed


You know what the best thing about this is Nash? It's that Iraq could have complied with it's cease-fire agreement and avoided this war.

Iraq instead chose to block inspectors from locations, then kick them out and F*** everyone around up to the last day.

If you think Iraq was trying to comply for 12 years and that they really wanted to destroy their banned weaopons, including wdm, you are a crackpot.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2003, 08:29:39 PM by NUKE »

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #64 on: June 26, 2003, 08:28:16 PM »
Not a Hitler apologist at all - thats obviously irrelevant except for drawing the comparison - but you are certainly a Saddam appologist... Youw own words make that clear...

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #65 on: June 26, 2003, 09:15:57 PM »
Anyway you look at it, it is something that he was supposed to bring to the UN, but instead deliberately hid it from them for over a decade . And yes it is a component of a nuclear weapons program . Used to distill uranium, enriched uranium only has one use that I know of .

Everybody knows they had "tons" of nbc weapons, they admitted it, they used them, they itemized them at one point for the UN, they tested nuclear devices, they built a nuclear a weapon, they had delivery systems, guidance systems, 18kg of enriched uranium. Most of the rockets were used up .

I thought this was pretty common knowledge, did everybody suddenly develope amnesia ? Or was it all a big disinformation conspiracy perpetrated by the UN and the rest of the world ? Did congress decide to mail weaponized anthrax to themselves ?

Where did it all go ? If he destroyed it, that was a violation of the cease fire agreement. If he hid it, that was a violation of the cease fire agreement .

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #66 on: June 26, 2003, 11:12:12 PM »
They should just close down the officers mess forum. Its gone to crap and there is no way back.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #67 on: June 27, 2003, 03:57:33 AM »
GRUNHERZ......

ever thought about having your own tv show? ... or radio if you are not pleased with your looks (makeup does wonders tho).

I sure missed the O'club when i was on vaication.

:D

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #68 on: June 27, 2003, 04:03:13 AM »
LOL!  Welcome back... :D

Offline bounder

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
      • http://www.332viking.com
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #69 on: June 27, 2003, 05:05:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Frogm4n
I wish our governent had a system more like englands where the different oposition groups can sit and critize what the prime minister does and the prime minister can defend him self face to face with his critics. if you havnt seen this in action check it out on cspan someday. its what one would expect from a true democracy.

It does look like that doesn't it? The truth is more complicated, in that parliament is being relegated to being a talking shop whilst many important decisions are taken in camera by the executive or the prime minister's PR Flack. PMQs (prime minister's questions) is now a weekly puppet show instead of the proper grilling that he and his ministers should get.

Part of the problem is the huge majority that labour have.

Another is the 'presidential style' of PM blair

Another is the lack of an effective Opposition, as the conservatives (right wingers) have totally lost their way and now spend their time sniping at each other.

Offline Arfann

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 609
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #70 on: June 27, 2003, 11:31:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
Oddly enough, I just logged on to post the same thing.


You both odd enough as I see it. Hmm. Marti and Gruni posting the same right wing drivel? Who'da figgered.

Offline Syzygyone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Arf Arf
« Reply #71 on: June 27, 2003, 11:43:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arfann
You both odd enough as I see it. Hmm. Marti and Gruni posting the same right wing drivel? Who'da figgered.


Another suprise: Arf barks some more liberal tripe!:D

Offline Arfann

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 609
Re: Arf Arf
« Reply #72 on: June 27, 2003, 12:34:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Syzygyone
Another suprise: Arf barks some more liberal tripe!:D


MMMmmm. Tripe! Should be some outstanding menudo at the chili cook-off in Pueblo tomorrow.

So, Marti itches, Barti scratches and Sysi says "Aaaahhhhh".

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Well it's started the CIA s planting evidence and digging it up...
« Reply #73 on: June 27, 2003, 12:50:49 PM »
D Letterman should deff. use the last few mins of every show with "top 10 from AH BBS" :D

Offline Syzygyone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Re: Arf Arf
« Reply #74 on: June 27, 2003, 12:57:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arfann
MMMmmm. Tripe! Should be some outstanding menudo at the chili cook-off in Pueblo tomorrow.

So, Marti itches, Barti scratches and Sysi says "Aaaahhhhh".


Now we've resorted to "cute" tripe, eh?

BTW:

First,

tripe    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  n.
    1) The rubbery lining of the stomach of cattle or other ruminants, used as food.
     2) Informal. Something of no value; rubbish.

Not to demean your chili recipe, but I consider this an informal BBS and thus used the informal meaning.


Secondly, there is no "i" in Syzygy.  "i" would be a vowel and I am boycotting vowels, don't you know!


:D