Author Topic: a small poll..... (Read 279 times)

NOD2000 · « **on:** July 01, 2003, 04:17:49 PM »

just say yay or nay.......

i know gun jamming is not implemented into AH I but if it is in II do you think that the P-51B should have its legendary problem of guns jamming under pos g's?

every book i have ever read that is about a pilot who flew a p51b in the war, said that was a HUGE problem with the plane.

BenDover · « **Reply #1 on:** July 03, 2003, 01:03:27 PM »

BGBMAW · « **Reply #2 on:** July 03, 2003, 04:41:31 PM »

no gun jams please..there is certain amount of things we cannot have in here,,it will be CRAppy....

You could also have random mecanical failure..

HELLNOOO

I am looking forward to new damage model tho....like single intstrument loss..like --gas gauges...heading inicatrs..speed ind..etc..

gun jams have been brought up before..it suks...

so agaoin HELL NO

love BiGB
xoxzo

ccvi · « **Reply #3 on:** July 03, 2003, 06:13:38 PM »

Sure!

We already have random things that can fail, e.g. other players or bombers warping right into you to cause a crash.

Why not have something that randomly fails and even existed in reality?

WhiteHawk · « **Reply #4 on:** July 04, 2003, 11:18:15 AM »

Where will it stop. Gun jamming falls into the same category as gun freezing, and overheating. I dont have any literature on the subject, but heard Chuck yeager say in an interview that , the .50's would burn the barrels after about 3 consecutive seconds of firing.
I personally, wouldnt mind any of the realisms being introduced,
but the "I PAY MY 15 DOLLARS A MONTH AND IF I WANT TO SHOOT MY GUNS, THEY BETTER GORD DAMMED WELL BE READY TO GO, OR ELSE I'LL QUIT AND CANCEL MY ACCOUNT" crowd carries a lot of wieght in the MA.

BenDover · « **Reply #5 on:** July 04, 2003, 11:52:23 AM »

Fine, have Man settings as an option for the CT and ToD.