Author Topic: Is this true?  (Read 361 times)

Offline _Schadenfreude_

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Is this true?
« on: July 10, 2003, 05:23:55 AM »
Saw the following report on a local bbb run by a local paper and was wondering if it was actually true?

++++++++++++++++++++

Published on Friday, March 28, 2003 by CommonDreams.org
Support the Warrior Not the War: Give Them Their Benefits!
by Ashley L Decker

The recent rally cry "Support Our Troops" seems to me little more than a perverted, propaganda ploy to "Support the War." But we can support our troops, without supporting the war, by rectifying some of the following conditions.
The House of Representatives have recently voted on the 2004 budget which will cut funding for veteran's health care and benefit programs by nearly $25 billion over the next ten years. It narrowly passed by a vote of 215 to 212, and came just a day after Congress passed a resolution to "Support Our Troops." How exactly does this vote support our troops? Does leaving our current and future veterans veterans without access to health care and compensation qualify as supporting them?

The Veteran's Administration, plagued by recent budget cuts, has had to resort to charging new veterans entering into its system a yearly fee of $250 in order for them to receive treatment. It is a sad irony that the very people being sent to fight the war are going to have to pay to treat the effects of it.

According to the Veteran's Administration, 28 million veterans are currently using VA benefits. Another 70 million Americans are potential candidates for such programs. This amounts to a quarter of the country's population. Veterans and their families will sadly begin finding that they have no place to turn for their medical treatment as V.A. hospitals across the country face closing their doors. With the budget shrinking, staff will be let go. This could mean the loss of over 19,000 nurses. Without these nurses, this leads to the loss of over 6.6 million outpatient visits. Approximately one out of every two veterans could lose their only source of medical care. That is, if they even realize help is available to them. The Bush Administration recently ordered V.A. medical centers to stop publicizing available benefits to veterans seeking assistance. This follows discontinued enrollments of some eligible veterans for healthcare benefits as of January, 2003.

Bush Administration funding cuts will also prevent veterans from receiving their disability pensions. My father was granted 100% disability six years ago for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder associated with the Vietnam War. He deserves every cent of it. As do all soldiers who are willing to go to war. Under the Bush administration, being granted the ability to receive war related compensation has become a rare privilege, not a right as it should be. Nearly a third of Gulf War veterans, about 209,000 veterans, have submitted claims to to the VA for disability. The backlog of unprocessed claims has reached the astronomical count of 489,297, a number which is unfortunately increasing all of time. There are also currently 500,000 Compensation and Pension cases still pending.

+++++++++++++++

Pretty apalling if it is......

Offline Syzygyone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Well...
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2003, 09:18:23 AM »
I'm not sure but I think this is a typical media distortion.  I think that the "cut" is a percentage decrease in the annual increase in funding.  Overall funding still iincreased, but just not as much as had been requested.  

Just my two cents worth.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Re: Well...
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2003, 09:37:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Syzygyone
I'm not sure but I think this is a typical media distortion.  I think that the "cut" is a percentage decrease in the annual increase in funding.  Overall funding still iincreased, but just not as much as had been requested.  

Just my two cents worth.


It smells of "School Lunch Program Media Distortion".

Offline _Schadenfreude_

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Well...
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2003, 09:52:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Syzygyone
I'm not sure but I think this is a typical media distortion.  I think that the "cut" is a percentage decrease in the annual increase in funding.  Overall funding still iincreased, but just not as much as had been requested.  

Just my two cents worth.


cc thnks

Offline Silat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2536
+Silat
"The first time someone shows you who they are, believe them." — Maya Angelou
"Conservatism offers no redress for the present, and makes no preparation for the future." B. Disraeli
"All that serves labor serves the nation. All that harms labor is treason."