Author Topic: Iraq vs Vietnam  (Read 679 times)

Offline MoMoney

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Iraq vs Vietnam
« on: July 14, 2003, 02:24:14 PM »
Is the problem we’ve got in Iraq comparable to Vietnam?  Well I’m a numbers guy- and I ran some numbers:

Vietnam:
1962-1972…about 3650 days.
58,185 poor souls lost their lives in this useless war.
This  yields a death/rate of about 16 per day.

Iraq:
May 1 until today- 61 days
33 poor souls have lost their lives in this useless war (since official end).
This yields a death/rate of about 1.8 per day.

Vietnam …hell no.

Useless war which has alienated our allies.  Stirred up the already volatile middle-east.  Will deliver the Middle East to the Islamic fundamentalists on a silver platter.

HELL YES.

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2003, 02:26:47 PM »
So are you in favor or against the military intervention in Iraq?

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2003, 02:30:03 PM »
My bad, thought this was stating the air time for a soccer game :p

Offline MoMoney

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2003, 02:30:15 PM »
BTW- those Vietnam numbers a "Padded" a bit because we really didn't have a big presence until after 1962.  So say 1968-1972 would yield a much higher number.

Offline MrCoffee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 934
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2003, 02:30:28 PM »
Perhaps they should try a new technic. Yawn, I need some coffee.

Offline wulfie

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 792
      • http://www.twinkies.com/index.asp
Re: Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2003, 02:32:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MoMoney
Will deliver the Middle East to the Islamic fundamentalists on a silver platter.

HELL YES.


Yeah look at the situation between Israel and the Palestinians. It's really taken a turn for the worst.

If you're a career terrorist.

Mike/wulfie

Offline MrCoffee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 934
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2003, 03:10:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrCoffee
Perhaps they should try a new technic. Yawn, I need some coffee.


Oops, read wrong somewhere. I meant the Isrealis. Between whats happening in Iraq now and how Isreal handled Palistinian aggression is vastly different. All I know is what is televised on TV so I know I dont have the complete picture of the situation in Iraq, can only guess.

I think is a matter of time before things just get better. If they can minimize casualties as much as possible, that would be a good thing. Hard to defend against some jerk in a crowd with a nade or RPG just waiting.

Then again, its difficult to replace dead family, friends, or loved ones. Ha, theres your recipe for neverending Jihad.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2003, 03:28:24 PM by MrCoffee »

Offline davidpt40

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1053
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2003, 08:50:41 PM »
I think if Iraq fought Vietnam, Vietnam would win.  The Vietnamese have huge numbers of water buffalo and could smash through Iraqi lines with ease.

Offline Nash

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11705
      • http://sbm.boomzoom.org/
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2003, 09:59:39 PM »
Right or wrong, they have to find and kill Hussein asap. I very much doubt he's directly involved in the attacks, but he serves as some strong motivation I'm sure.

I know it's easier said than done, but I really am stumped as to why it's *this* hard to capture both him and OBL. It's just weird.

Offline Montezuma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 959
Re: Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #9 on: July 14, 2003, 10:13:14 PM »
Only 20 attacks a day on US troops, no big deal.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2003, 12:27:55 AM »
The only thing Vietnam and the Iraq war have in common is that they both appear to have started with trumped up reasons.


Ack-Ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Re: Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2003, 01:58:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MoMoney
Iraq vs Vietnam


Ditka 82, Vietnam 23, Iraq 14.

Offline nuchpatrick

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1062
      • http://www.361stvfg.com
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #12 on: July 15, 2003, 07:18:59 AM »
Didn't the French have something to do with Vietnam. Were they not the ones to stir this whole mess up to begin with.

Offline Maniac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3817
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2003, 07:20:39 AM »
Quote
Didn't the French have something to do with Vietnam. Were they not the ones to stir this whole mess up to begin with.


Are you trolling or what?
Warbirds handle : nr-1 //// -nr-1- //// Maniac

Offline nuchpatrick

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1062
      • http://www.361stvfg.com
Iraq vs Vietnam
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2003, 07:31:13 AM »
Not really the whole involvement with Vietnam was due to French. The thing is France returned to Vietnam after 45' when Japan surendered to Allies.

See it all started in 1945, Japan ousted the Vichy French and assumed direct rule over Vietnam; the Viet Minh stepped up their anti-Japanese activities. By the time Japan surrendered to the United States, in August 1945, it represented the strongest political force in Vietnam. On September 2, 1945, using the words of the American Declaration of Independence, Ho Chi Minh proclaimed Vietnam a free and independent country. His hope was that his wartime allies would restrain the French from attempting to dominate Vietnam ever again. Instead, the British, in the south, and the Nationalist Chinese, in the north, enabled the French to return. Within a year, the Viet Minh was once more fighting for the independence of Vietnam against the French.

Although the United States disapproved of French tactics, the desire to support its European ally, combined with a growing concern over Communist power in Asia, led first President Truman and then President Eisenhower into close cooperation with the French war effort. By 1954, when the Geneva Conference brought a temporary end to fighting in Vietnam, the United States was paying over 75 percent of the French war costs.

Despite the Viet Minh's massive victory over the French at Dien Bien Phu, the United States tried to persuade the French to keep fighting. The Eisenhower administration even considered the direct use of U.S. military force, including combat troops and nuclear weapons. Neither the British nor the U.S. Congress was enthusiastic, however. Eisenhower and Secretary of State Dulles ultimately acknowledged the Geneva Agreements, which divided Vietnam at the 17th parallel, a temporary demarcation line meant to separate French and Viet Minh forces until elections scheduled for 1956. Ho Chi Minh firmly controlled the area north of the line, while the area south of the 17th parallel was put in the hands of the conservative nationalist Ngo Dinh Diem. It was hoped that the nationwide elections scheduled for 1956 would lead to national reunification.

We never saw the reunification...