Author Topic: an another usefull patch (Read 1406 times)

SFRT - Frenchy · « **on:** November 29, 2001, 01:57:00 PM »

Fixed a bug with the P-47D-30 that was causing it to not get its full WEP performance.
Hehehe tyvm Pyro ... finally ... a little step for humanity, a big step for Frenchy

Added new loadouts to the P-47D-25 and D-30 for larger drop tanks.
I know that Sancho bumped his head on the ceiling when he read that one.

Fixed a damage problem with the Panzer and Ostwind that made them explode easy.
Coupled to the ability to repair them w/C47s, maybe the ground war will come back again ... wohoo!

....plus all the other usefull stuff or/and ideas included in this patch

Tac · « **Reply #1 on:** November 29, 2001, 02:00:00 PM »

cod, frenchy got more WEP now. This is terrible

The P-38 tails strengthened woot!

DamnedATC · « **Reply #2 on:** November 29, 2001, 02:00:00 PM »

Thanks for the continued updates.

ATC

Am0n · « **Reply #3 on:** November 29, 2001, 02:04:00 PM »

This is most excellent!!

i wana go home from work now and play AH

*im fealing a lil ill boss (insert coughing)*

hehe

funkedup · « **Reply #4 on:** November 29, 2001, 02:07:00 PM »

500 lb in Mossie bomb bay.

Mitsu · « **Reply #5 on:** November 29, 2001, 02:36:00 PM »

Attacker Sortie in Ki-61...

Thanks Pyro/HTC Staffs.

Mitsu

SFRT - Frenchy · « **Reply #6 on:** November 29, 2001, 02:40:00 PM »

Hey, I like the new map settings ... very practical, WTG!

R4M · « **Reply #7 on:** November 29, 2001, 02:46:00 PM »

yah. Add more drop tanks for the P47. We all know they lacked lots of ordnance options and was an urgent thing wich demanded instant fix, true?

.

Of course, and at the same time we all know the Fw190F8 has ALL and EVERY ordnance options it should, already.

.

The P47D30 can load an ammount of weapons it could't historically, but the Fw190F8 has't even what it used ina normal basis. The plane lacks lots of ordnance options, including wing bombs, wing drop tanks and rockets.

Call this a whine, or take it in any way you want to take it. THe only thing that I know is I'm seriously pissed off.

[ 11-29-2001: Message edited by: R4M ]

funkedup · « **Reply #8 on:** November 29, 2001, 02:54:00 PM »

RAM, rocket armament on F-8 was only ~115 planes and the special wing pylons for drop tanks or 250 kg bombs were not at all standard. The Fw 190F-8/U1 was supposed to be a replacement for the G-8 but production figures are unknown. Sure AH should have a Fw 190G-8 but don't mislead people that the G-8 wing pylons were standard on F-8. I've seen Glasses propogating this falsehood as well.

[ 11-29-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]

R4M · « **Reply #9 on:** November 29, 2001, 03:01:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by funkedup:
RAM, rocket armament on F-8 was only ~115 planes and the special wing pylons for drop tanks or 250 kg bombs were not at all standard. The Fw 190F-8/U1 was supposed to be a replacement for the G-8 but production figures are unknown. Sure AH should have a Fw 190G-8 but don't try to fool people that the G-8 wing pylons were standard on F-8.

[ 11-29-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]

I dunno, funked. All I know is that I have quite some photos of 190F8s with wing drop tanks, or with wing bombs, or with wing rockets.

show me ONE of a P47D30 with 2500lbs of bombs (one in center line, 2 of 1000lbs on the wings), 10 HVAR rockets, and 8MG with 425 rounds per gun), and I'll shut up.

In the meantime, you already know what I think.

[ 11-29-2001: Message edited by: R4M ]

popeye · « **Reply #10 on:** November 29, 2001, 03:06:00 PM »

Here comes da Jug!

SOB · « **Reply #11 on:** November 29, 2001, 03:08:00 PM »

Hey RAM, you're acting like a 12 year old again.

SOB

Professor Fate · « **Reply #12 on:** November 29, 2001, 03:09:00 PM »

Bringing in historical figures to warrant what should be changed or added does not make any sense. We have American and Japanese planes taking off from same carrier, the LW is represented in the pacific area of ops.

What does make the difference when determining what gets done? Money does thats what. Sure a company may evendually get to the little guy but it's the majority who provides the means to do it get priority, they are what makes the company run

At least they would if I ran a company

Ya can't keep everyone happy all the time

Remember not only is it a game but a business aswell

[ 11-29-2001: Message edited by: Professor Fate ]

R4M · « **Reply #13 on:** November 29, 2001, 03:11:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SOB:
Hey RAM, you're acting like a 12 year old again.

SOB

hum... because I say what I think instead of keeping my mouth shut and being a good (but silent guy)?.

Then I guess I'd be a 12-year-old forever. Guess is in my genes to say what I think.

Prof. Fate:
Then why not model the P51 FM with more climbrate, acceleration and speeD?. After all, we have nikis and 109s winging in the MA, true? so why to get that historically right, too?.

I'm sure lots of americans would get really happy to see their mustang with a 109's acceleration. And, as it is a business, it would be good to do it so , right?

More or less the same case we see here. A plane can take an unrealistic load and instead of fixing that, they even ADD more options to it. At the same time another plane lacks some of its historical options, and they do nothing in that regard.

in a business you dont get people pissed if you can avoid it...but dunno here.

PS: the italian fighters lack some bomb options too, yahknow

. But yes,add more DTs for the jugs, pleasE!

[ 11-29-2001: Message edited by: R4M ]

Am0n · « **Reply #14 on:** November 29, 2001, 03:14:00 PM »

Waaaaaaahh..

mommy he got something and i didnt get anything!