Author Topic: physics flaw in AH?  (Read 2141 times)

Offline Ozark

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1176
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #60 on: August 29, 2003, 01:23:14 PM »
My brain hurts. :)

Offline Ozark

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1176
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #61 on: August 29, 2003, 01:34:11 PM »
Quote
(Why does the tail come off the ground during the takeoff roll on a taildragger type aircraft?)


I got an idea. Lets discuss the forces of ground effect, prop wash and deflection on the horizontal stabilizer during take-off and landing.

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #62 on: August 29, 2003, 02:14:36 PM »
GScholz: You havn't a clue how compression effect are done in AH.

Almost every time I see you make an attempt at a factual statement of what or how AH models somthing, your statement is incorect. Please stop making statments about AH that are just simply incorect, and that you have no knowledge of.

HiTech

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #63 on: August 29, 2003, 02:32:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by hitech
GScholz: You havn't a clue how compression effect are done in AH.


True, I have no clue how your FM models compression. I do know however that a plane which is compressed cannot trim itself out of the compression. In AH they can, and this is wrong.

Please do not take offence from me debating airplane physics and AH. I mean no offence, and I'm sorry if you have taken it as such.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline dBeav

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 178
      • http://yankeeairmuseum.org
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #64 on: August 29, 2003, 02:50:01 PM »
If Bernoulli is right how does a plane fly upside down????

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #65 on: August 29, 2003, 02:52:49 PM »
GScholz:
it's just statments like this.

Quote
In AH no plane truly compresses


That are over the top. Debating physics questions is fine.

HiTech

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #66 on: August 29, 2003, 03:04:12 PM »
True. I should have added AFAIK to that statement. I apologize.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Twist

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #67 on: August 29, 2003, 06:16:20 PM »
When I saw the title I expected a discussion about the N1K-UFO.

I like the helicopter theory, always assumed that to be somewhat true.
Razer

Hellcat FG

"They porked the Hellcat? Why did they do that?"

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #68 on: August 29, 2003, 07:28:54 PM »
well it was just discussed in another thread provided by frenchy that I missed. seems the tail gone behavior is accurate :D

wtg HTC :)
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline Ozark

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1176
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #69 on: August 29, 2003, 07:59:11 PM »
Quote
well it was just discussed in another thread provided by frenchy that I missed. seems the tail gone behavior is accurate :D wtg HTC :)


Darn you! I was forced to use my brain too!

Maybe I should check Frenchy's link. ;)

Hey Frenchy, Would FIT be proud?

;)

Offline ICKID

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 153
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #70 on: August 29, 2003, 09:35:13 PM »
The tail comes off the gound only if you move the stick forward during the take off roll.

The tail does not provide positive lift, it produces a downward force.  If a tail comes off, as happened to me, 1968 VietNam, from Triple AAA (L19 Birddog, 1900ft AGL) the aircraft noses up, way up.

Offline Ozark

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1176
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #71 on: August 29, 2003, 09:46:30 PM »
WOW!
IcKid

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #72 on: August 29, 2003, 10:06:59 PM »
ickid how did you escape? parachute out the side door?
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1226
Re: physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #73 on: August 31, 2003, 06:19:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Citabria
it would seem ah has a flaw in the cg of its airplanes, when one looses its tail its engine heavy nose goes up and its nonexistant tailpoints downward.


Hi Citabria,

I think I posted this explanation in another thread, but I'll post it again here to save folk searching for it.

The behaviour you have described appears to be perfectly correct to me, and is exactly what I would expect from the excellent flight model in AcesHigh. I think the confusion in this discussion has been caused by some misunderstanding of the system of forces known to exist during flight, and in the way they are used in trying to explain what happens when the tail has gone away.

Just bear with me while I build an image of what happens… There you are flying along, minding your own business, in level flight at some constant speed. At this point the stability diagram you find in most text books is doing us proud! All the forces on your aircraft are balanced. The prop’ thrust is balanced with drag, the lift with weight and so on. All the moments are balanced too, the pitching yawing and rolling moments are all in equilibrium. The nose down pitching moment caused by the weight and lift couple is balanced at the tail, and so on.

Now, since the question only concerns what direction the nose points when the tail goes away, let’s just think about those pitching moments. Most folk think like this… During flight the weight and lift couple was trying to rotate the nose downwards, and the tail was preventing this from happening. So, if we remove the tail, there will be nothing to prevent that rotation, and the nose will drop… Not so fast! That’s not what happens, you might not see this right away, so bear with me, I’m going to go slowly… But first, the flaw in that reasoning is that it overlooks the fact that the nose down pitching moment that existed during controlled flight, also goes away with the tail. You see, the tail wasn’t only responsible for the balancing moment, it was also indirectly responsible for the lift that was produced the nose down pitching moment in the first place. Once the tail has gone, the couple rotating the nose down, no longer exists… So what does happen?

Firstly, the wings are only producing lift when they are forced to do so by the control surfaces at the tail. Those surfaces (using a small force but long lever arm) rotate the wings against the airflow, forcing the wings to fly at an angle to the free air stream, thereby rotating the airstream, causing downwash, and thus lift. When the elevators go away with the tail, the wings will begin to move upwards, due to the lift already there, but they won’t go far because as they move the lift decays rapidly until the wings weather vane, and no longer produce any lift. That all happens in just a few degrees, so when the tail goes away, the nose might move down slightly, but only momentarily, because now that only leaves an engine, with the wings and forward/mid fuselage acting as little more than dead weight that simply wants to fall downwards, with a propeller attached to it that is still producing thrust.

Now, all you really need to consider at this point is how a heavy lump of metal with a propeller attached to it would fall. I think most people can see intuitively, that the heavy lump would fall first, dragging the propeller behind it. An admittedly weak analogy would be the stable condition that arises with a man hanging beneath a parachute. The aircraft falls, dragging the prop behind it, and falls more slowly because the prop is producing thrust and slowing it down.

That's exactly what happens in AcesHigh... Kudos HT!

Hope that helps.

Badboy
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1226
physics flaw in AH?
« Reply #74 on: August 31, 2003, 06:26:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ICKID
The tail comes off the gound only if you move the stick forward during the take off roll.

The tail does not provide positive lift, it produces a downward force.  If a tail comes off, as happened to me, 1968 VietNam, from Triple AAA (L19 Birddog, 1900ft AGL) the aircraft noses up, way up.


Now that's a story that I would love to hear!

Would you be interested in putting something together for publication on the http://www.simhq.com website?  

Badboy
« Last Edit: August 31, 2003, 06:29:45 PM by Badboy »
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired