Interesting debate.
It IS true that I throw carp equally. I am just as critical of iEN and the things I feel they do wrong as I am of the things I think are wrong in AH.
The people I piss off the most are the "aw shucks" crowd of people who can't stand to see anyone have a strong opinion about anything. There has to be all this eggshell-walking, qualifying, wussy language around everything. Well, those folks can bite me. I don't have time for it. I call 'em as I see 'em. I admit to being sarcastic a lot of the time, it's just my style. More interesting than a whole paragraph of IMHOs, "...or maybe not", or whatever hoohah. But, if you look past the humor (yes, it is a form of humor), you can see that I usually *do* have a point, whether you agree with it or not. And I don't demand that anyone agree with it, just because I state it firmly. It's just "one man's opinion". Take it with a huge grain of salt, agree, disagree, post, move on.
Now, as to the "YOU code something" whinge: you can bite me, too. Just because I've never run a government doesn't give me the right to complain about politicians? That's the weakest reasoning yet. I don't normally get into "code-level" second-guessing, but I think I am entitled to an opinion over what features I want to see, and what kind of direction (or lack of same) I want strat to take.
And banana, why do I have to have an ulterior motive to say, WTG on the terrain editor??? I'm not joined to iEN at the hip, if that's what you're implying. I have said before, and I'll say it again, if AH had (IMO) satisfactory solutions to the things I cared about *most*, I might have been over here a long time ago. I still reserve the right to monitor its progress and comment on it, too. Whether you take me seriously, banana, I care not a whit (speaking of arrogance...)
That being said, I'd ALSO like to return to talking about textures and soon-to-come maps....

[This message has been edited by Stiglr (edited 08-10-2000).]