Author Topic: "Girls Gone Wild" in Court! (Read 953 times)

Vulcan · « **Reply #15 on:** September 04, 2003, 05:44:45 PM »

So let me get this straight.

This guy wanders around with a video camera. He finds parties.

At these parties are potentially underage girls, drinking illegaly, taking drugs illegally.

The girls expose themselves and say they're 18.

Later the parents complain that the girls were filmed illegally and therefore its kiddie porn.

Fine, if they prosecute him I hope each and every underage girl is also prosecuted for underage drinking and illegal drugs use. And that each and every parent is examined for their role in their childrens use of illegal drugs and underage alchohol consumption.

The real worry is, this guy only took piccies, what happened to those girls later in the party?

rc51 · « **Reply #16 on:** September 04, 2003, 05:53:50 PM »

sounds like mom and pop should have raised there daughters better

rpm · « **Reply #17 on:** September 04, 2003, 08:00:46 PM »

I took a trip to Cancun 2 years ago for my Birthday. I didn't even think about it being Spring Break. The stuff I saw happen at the GGW party had NUTHIN on what I saw at Coco Bongo and Senoir Frogs. What happens in Cancun stays in Cancun...thanks to Trojan.

mora · « **Reply #18 on:** September 05, 2003, 02:31:52 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mickey1992
Tell that to the judge.

p.s. Is it safe to assume that you are not the father of any daughters?

Should it be that way? What the hell does nudity have to do with pornography?

You Ameerikans are so ****ed up in some things...

Maniac · « **Reply #19 on:** September 05, 2003, 04:03:41 AM »

They did the fathers an friggin favor for christ sake!!! kiddie porn? you have to be kidding me...

If those little sluts flash their titties and have sex etc in public then hell, why cant one film them? they are doing in the plowing public...

Its one thing to lure people to your hotell room, drug them and then film them...

Hussies!

Tuomio · « **Reply #20 on:** September 05, 2003, 10:24:20 AM »

Lol yeah, their kid was doing druuugs in an druug party and showing tits to video camera. Parents response is to sue the camera man?

How does that serve any justice? Why can people lie their ages and get away with it and is not even considered anything worth to mention in courtroom? The girl who lied her age should be prosecuted for fraud and possibly for staging a crime. What is the responsibility of underaged invidual to make others aware this important legal factor?

Mickey1992 · « **Reply #21 on:** September 05, 2003, 10:27:36 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tuomio
What is the responsibility of underaged invidual to make others aware this important legal factor?

They are not adults so they have limited responsibilities. It is the responsibility of the adult to verify the minor's age.

Now, if they showed fake identification, screw 'em. There have been recent civil lawsuits where bar owners are suing underage drinkers who present fake indentification in order to recoup fines and court costs imposed on the bar owner.

Trell · « **Reply #22 on:** September 05, 2003, 10:55:15 AM »

If it is in public then there should not be a problem.

if you see some girl flashing in public do you want the cops to throw you in jail for noticing?.

its stupid.

If the parents cant raise there children right.
then the parents should really thinking about what they did wrong.
the parents seem to think it is everyone else fault but theres.

btw y if you do something wrong at 15+ you are treated like a adult in the court system?

LePaul · « **Reply #23 on:** September 05, 2003, 11:02:39 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Trell
btw y if you do something wrong at 15+ you are treated like a adult in the court system?

Wow. Fantastic point.

Didnt Florida just put a 12 year old away for life...for murder.

A 16-17 year old flashies some perkies, and 40 years for the camera-man/producer?

Hmmmm...

Tuomio · « **Reply #24 on:** September 05, 2003, 02:29:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mickey1992
They are not adults so they have limited responsibilities. It is the responsibility of the adult to verify the minor's age.

Yes i understand if it would be 10 year old showing the tits and presenting to be 18 year old. I dont think ID is the crucial point, it should be considered as an spoken agreement, which is already considered as worthy as black on white in courtroom. Thats if you can prove that there was said agreement and in this case its on the tape. Were talking about tits here not some HC porn, in which every ID check should be absolutely necessary.

Its unfair to force regular people to check out things that in real life sudden situations just usually cant be checked, like ID. Visual age verification is ofcourse impossible, when 14 year olds wear makeup and dress like 19 year olds. This will be growing problem as digital cameras are very soon going to be everywhere and in everyones pocket.

Mickey1992 · « **Reply #25 on:** September 05, 2003, 02:34:55 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tuomio
I dont think ID is the crucial point, it should be considered as an spoken agreement, which is already considered as worthy as black on white in courtroom.

Minors are not permitted to engage in legally binding agreements.

Quote

Its unfair to force regular people to check out things that in real life sudden situations just usually cant be checked, like ID.

I agree, but these weren't regular people. Joe Francis is the owner of a multi-million dollar video production company.