Author Topic: Name This...(619)  (Read 466 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(619)
« on: September 06, 2003, 08:34:07 PM »
???




Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Name This...(619)
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2003, 08:45:40 PM »
Japanese miniature battleship.

Offline M.C.202

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 244
Name This...(619)
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2003, 08:53:54 PM »
The first "Transformer" ?

Offline Shiva

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 966
      • http://members.cox.net/srmalloy/
Name This...(619)
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2003, 10:23:35 PM »
It looks like a Japanese Type 2 Amphibious Tank "Ka-Mi", developed using many of the components of the Type 95 Light Tank; the dividing lines on the vehicle can be seen where the actual tank hull is mated to the float units on the bow and stern of the tank; these floats were dropped after the vehicle reached land.

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(619)
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2003, 01:56:42 PM »
It is, Type 3 Ka Chi.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Name This...(619)
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2003, 03:29:10 PM »
Itsa kaching?

Offline Shiva

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 966
      • http://members.cox.net/srmalloy/
Name This...(619)
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2003, 08:40:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by brady
It is, Type 3 Ka Chi.


Type 2, Brady; go back and look at the website where you found the picture. The Type 3's turret has a cupola arrangement on top, and the turret overall is smaller.

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(619)
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2003, 12:00:54 PM »
I doubled checked one of my sources, it is posable it is incorect, but the orgine source for this pic list's it as a Type 3.