need more detailed maps

[LtMagee]

You would need a much more detailed map and a much more detailed terrain. This idea may be good for buff formations, that is, you pick up a buff formation, and your map has no "own plane simbol" nor autocentering.

Agreed, we need more detailed maps.....then
Get rid of the inflight GPS System

[6389]

i agrrewith you but i like gps for ffa rooms and large teams rooms

[ALF]

There is no way in hell you can fly by a map in the current terrain.  There just isnt enough detasil in the maps or variation in the terrain.  There are no real cities/bridges/landmarks to help guide you....not even detailed railroad tracks.  Not to mention that radar was a part of WWII and could give reasonably accurate info on local.

[ramzey]

Originally posted by LtMagee
Get rid of the inflight GPS System

why the hell you start secound thread in one week about saame topic?


and answer is still NO

[Arlo]

Originally posted by ramzey
why the hell you start secound thread in one week about saame topic?


and answer is still NO

WHO's answer is still no? (eg)

[MaddDog]

i can half way navigate these maps with no gps, once you fly them day after day you start to learn where certain things are from certain bases, the mountains and lakes always stay in the same place so i use mostly mountains, hills and lakes stuff like that to navigate rightnow just for fun. But i agree we need much more detaild maps for bombing missions specially in TOD if we lose the GPS

[LtMagee]

ooops, I forgot to add my agrred statement with post...its been edited.


First post was a GPS post
Second post was a post for a more detailed map/s...then refer back to first post. Sorry about that.

[Devourer]

Some of the maps have 20k foot mountain ranges, that have vegetation growing on the peaks. Shouldnt they be covered in snow from about 11k feet?