Just a few things I've been wonderin' about.
Try this (offline if you're worried about your score. I did it online so I'd have an excuse. Truth is, ever since I started wearing pants while flying, I haven't been able to buy a kill.):
Raise gear on runway in your favorite ride.
After they sweep away the wreckage, replane, taxi to the dirt off the R/Way, and try again.
So the runway is a lot "harder" on your A/C than dirt.
Now, if you exit the plane off the runway (as I found out taxiing to the hangar), it counts as a ditch.
So, an attempt to model a "hard" runway and force people to exit planes there has the unrealistic consequence of making the safest approach landing off the runway and taxiing to it.
I imagine this is due in part to the runway being considered an object (that can be bombed -- woohoo!), and plane/object collisions have been modelled, while ground hasn't.
Still, in addition to asking that it be looked into, could we see somewhere way down the road the addition of other "safe landing exit zones" in probable places (e.g., taxiways, hangar, the O'Club)?
In the meantime, runways are purely for showoffs.