Author Topic: Production Costs for WWII Equipment  (Read 802 times)

Offline NJMAW

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 120
      • http://www.marineairwingah.homestead.com/2nd_MAW.html
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« on: October 02, 2003, 11:32:00 AM »
I have been wondering how mich did planes tanks and weapons in general cost to produce per copy?

I know that a P38J ran about 90k+ and a P51D was over 50K.  

Anyone have a webpage or any idea how much these things cost?:confused:

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2003, 01:08:47 PM »
PzIV Ausf.G: 103.462 reich marks without armament.

Offline NJMAW

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 120
      • http://www.marineairwingah.homestead.com/2nd_MAW.html
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2003, 05:34:13 PM »
Do you know the exchange rate for DM back them?

:confused:

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2003, 06:08:43 PM »
It would be virually impossible to "cost" German equipment.

Slave labour is a tough thing to figure out.  You have to feed them...although not much.  Then there is the housing, de-lousing, guards, trucks to carry out those who have been worked to death..etc, etc.

It's all part of the cost of production.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline MRPLUTO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 644
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2003, 06:13:10 PM »
NJMAW:

World War 2 Aircraft and GV Costs (1940-1941 figures)

SBD-2 Dauntless    $  59,814
B-17                        $ 200,000
B-26                         $130,000
OS2U Kingfisher         $49,195

M-3                             $33,500


[Source:  World War II Almanac 1931-1945, by Robert Goralski]

MRPLUTO VMF-323 ~Death Rattlers~ MAG-33

Offline MRPLUTO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 644
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2003, 06:21:05 PM »
Curval,

Actually the Nazis did a very accurate job of calculating the cost of slave labor.  They figured out just how much it would take to keep people barely alive.  They even calculated the value of the corpse:  gold teeth, for example.  Pretty sick.

MRPLUTO

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2003, 07:16:49 PM »
AFAIK the Germans didn't use slaves in the production of tanks or other high-tech (at that time) items. I do know they were used in the ammo factories and for general labor. German tanks were of very high quality compared to most others (if not all).
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2003, 07:49:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
AFAIK the Germans didn't use slaves in the production of tanks or other high-tech (at that time) items. I do know they were used in the ammo factories and for general labor. German tanks were of very high quality compared to most others (if not all).


Me163s, V1s, V2s and He162s were all built using slave labor.  I don't know about Me262s.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline MRPLUTO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 644
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2003, 10:21:46 PM »
I've read that the munitions made by slave labor had much higher dud rates than those made by paid, loyal workers.

A combination of sabotage and lack of motivation, obviously.

MRPLUTO

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2003, 10:34:00 PM »
262's as well. All Messer's. Willy did a little time in stir for that.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2003, 04:11:22 AM »
1940-1941. 5000 pounds per Spitfire. Can't remember the price of beer at the time though.:D :D
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline TimRas

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 560
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #11 on: October 03, 2003, 08:10:51 AM »

Offline airbumba

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1293
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2003, 08:40:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MRPLUTO
I've read that the munitions made by slave labor had much higher dud rates than those made by paid, loyal workers.

A combination of sabotage and lack of motivation, obviously.

MRPLUTO


To change this to modern times...
I always wondered when the US sells certain missiles, like say a 'sidewinder' wouldn't it be prudent to install a chip that would make the missile miss it's target if it were fired on an American plane?

It would be simple to do, you just need some sort of I.D.ing software that could read the radar profile then send the missile just a bit offcourse? I mean it couldn't be blatent, like a self destruct, but maybe just a premature detonation?

Just wonderin.

Bumba
I used to be a fatalist,
but that part of me died.

Offline Ouch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 208
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2003, 10:04:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by airbumba


It would be simple to do, you just need some sort of I.D.ing software that could read the radar profile then send the missile just a bit offcourse? I mean it couldn't be blatent, like a self destruct, but maybe just a premature detonation?
 


Yeah, but then it could be that your good buddy who you sold all those F-14's too (like, say, oh Iran) gets into a shooting war with you.

You never know what type of equipment your really need to be firing at, so you sure don't want to hamstring yourself.

Ouch out

Offline scJazz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 339
Production Costs for WWII Equipment
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2003, 10:14:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by airbumba
To change this to modern times...
I always wondered when the US sells certain missiles, like say a 'sidewinder' wouldn't it be prudent to install a chip that would make the missile miss it's target if it were fired on an American plane?

It would be simple to do, you just need some sort of I.D.ing software that could read the radar profile then send the missile just a bit offcourse? I mean it couldn't be blatent, like a self destruct, but maybe just a premature detonation?

Just wonderin.

Bumba


Not really possible since the interrogation system for IFF (Identify Friend Foe) is located in the launch vehicle not the weapon system itself. The weapon system includes a fuse for detonating the warhead but at this point it doesn't care what the target is just that it reached X distance. This is how we can still manage to whack friendly aircraft with our Pheonix missiles. Dipwad pilot lights up friendly and pulls the trigger. As for putting an interrogation system inside the weapon itself wouldn't work. It would be obvious to Freshman Electrical Engineer student what this bit of stuff is and he would yank it out.