Originally posted by lazs2
Oh come on... look at all the accusartions of "misogony" for ol clinton and the hawaiian in-no-way... In those cases the libs branded the women potatos and liars before they even heard the story.
I take any accusations of sexual harrasment that are years old with a grain of salt... especialy if they are by former girlfriends of the accused.
lazs
I'm sorry... Clinton is relevant in what way?
It's all political crap. It was with Clinton and it is with Arnold with regard to the women issue, IMHO. The left is no more correct to go after Arnold than the right was to go after Cllinton.
Show me someone that has went through life without making a few gross errors and I'll show you a coward that lacks the stones to take a chance.
I don't know when it happened exactly, but somewhere in the past fifty years, it became damn near impossible to run for office without having your personal life dragged into view by and for a public that really should mind their own business.
I want a leader to represent my interests and to speak on my behalf. Do I care if this puts him/her in the position to get laid frequently? Not particularly. In the larger scope of crimes that are possible by politicians, I'll take promiscuity over extortion, fraud, or the highest crime of all, forgetting who they are there for.
In short... I want an exceptional common man (or woman) in office.