Author Topic: Just a statement: (Read 761 times)

Ripsnort · « **on:** May 16, 2001, 07:47:00 AM »

IMO, let me repeat, IMO, the only thing that WB's has up on AH is their historical maps and their radar.

Any other AH folks want to add what they think the competition has on AH?

(Keep it clean, no community posts please)

AG Sachsenberg · « **Reply #1 on:** May 16, 2001, 07:54:00 AM »

Actually Fighter Ace has better looking chicks. My observation from those I have met

------------------

Verkaaft's mei Gwand `I foahr in himmel!
Sell my clothes I am going to Heaven!

[This message has been edited by AG Sachsenberg (edited 05-16-2001).]

funked · « **Reply #2 on:** May 16, 2001, 07:54:00 AM »

AH planeset is still missing a lot of planes.

RPS is far superior to perk system.

And the inflight radar really spoils AH arenas for me.

Pongo · « **Reply #3 on:** May 16, 2001, 07:56:00 AM »

Havent met the FA ones. But the chicks I met from HTC seemed pretty fine to me.

AG Sachsenberg · « **Reply #4 on:** May 16, 2001, 07:59:00 AM »

www.fighterchicks.com

Check it out and rate your flight sim's chicks. 3 categories of women to choose from. I have sponsored this site and I need web hits in order to run it. Otherwise my sponsors will drop my site

------------------

Verkaaft's mei Gwand `I foahr in himmel!
Sell my clothes I am going to Heaven!

[This message has been edited by AG Sachsenberg (edited 05-16-2001).]

Li`l Snorkey · « **Reply #5 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:02:00 AM »

1. Spitfire HF.Mk.IX with Merlin 71 engine (Excellent high alt performance)
2. Spitfre XIV (even though the FM is an abomination)
3. Early war aircraft
4. More historical terrains....Norway in Hostile Shores was a masterpiece !!! <S> to the team that created it

Ripsnort, regarding radar, I don't see how WB radar is better (or less worse) then AH.
Is it the sector bars you are talking about ?
IMO, radar should be modelled to include LOS limitations, i.e. whenever the LOS (Line Of Site) between your aircraft and the radar stations is obscured, your dot should be invisible. This should normally happen If you are flying in a valley or have a hill or mountain range in your area.

Snorkey

DRILL · « **Reply #6 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:04:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AG Sachsenberg:
www.fighterchicks.com

Check it out and rate your flight sim's chicks. 3 categories of women to choose from. I have sponsored this site and I need web hits in order to run it. Otherwise my sponsors will drop my site

WEB SITE NOT FOUND

too late its allready gone .......

------------------
DRILL

Ripsnort · « **Reply #7 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:05:00 AM »

AG, your hi-jacking.

AG Sachsenberg · « **Reply #8 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:16:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ripsnort:
AG, your hi-jacking.

Just messing with ya Rip, But Fa does have better looking chicks and More Japanese planes. Ki-84's Ki61-100 Jack. Planeset is the one thing AH is missing. And correctly modeled german weapons

Ripsnort · « **Reply #9 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:19:00 AM »

The reason I left plane set out, is because its just a matter of time, that is "in work", and it took WB's at LEAST 2.5 years (maybe more?) to get the number they have now. This sim was released in beta a year and a half ago, its well ahead of its former WB's for adding planes...so in summary, Planes are OTW.

jihad · « **Reply #10 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:28:00 AM »

IMO, let me repeat, IMO, the only thing that WB's has up on AH is their historical maps and their radar.

A lil bird told me ETO *might* be ready for this weekends Snapshot event. <G>

Philippines and a couple of others aren't far behind it.

Pepe · « **Reply #11 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:32:00 AM »

That's not fair, Ripsnort. Apples to Apples. You are not drawing a point on what will AH be in 2.5 years, but what is it now.

On the WB-AH comparison, I quite agree with your points. I would add planeset (altho, as you point, help is on the way) and offline mode, and, MOST important, Htc.'s responsiveness to client's voice.

Last one is, probably, the Key point that makes the difference and, being important as it is today, It will be more, as competition arises, and planeset etc. will move each sim closer to the other.

I think I like more AH's FM, Damage, Bullet & Terrains (not for the diversity, but for the possibilities).

On the respective communities, It's been a long time since I left WB, but I would say AH is evolving into what WB was. I feel it's less & less friendly as time goes by. Not that I'm worried, and I think is natural evolution from the bunch of sim nuts flying beta to the massive mega player that this thing points to.

Cheers,

Pepe

Ripsnort · « **Reply #12 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:33:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by jihad:

A lil bird told me ETO *might* be ready for this weekends Snapshot event. <G>

Philippines and a couple of others aren't far behind it.

Don't tease me like that, you ever go up to a lion's cage and hold a steak in front of the cage?

popeye · « **Reply #13 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:37:00 AM »

I thought RPS was better than Perk, and enjoyed surprise NOE attacks.

Ripsnort · « **Reply #14 on:** May 16, 2001, 08:41:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by popeye:
I thought RPS was better than Perk, and enjoyed surprise NOE attacks.

Didn't care for RPS (for MAIN arena stuff) but LOVED the NOE surprise attacks.

Author Topic: Just a statement: (Read 761 times)

AG Sachsenberg

funked

AG Sachsenberg

AG Sachsenberg