Author Topic: Supreme Court to revisit Net porn law (Read 1003 times)

AKIron · « **Reply #30 on:** October 17, 2003, 12:17:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Thrawn
AKIron's idea is unconstitutional in the US. It abridges the right to free speach.

"You can say what what you want, as long as you do the following."

Darn leftists. Parents should be responsible for raising their kids, not the state. The parents should upgrade from Windows 3.1 and put administrative controls on the computers browser. Cripes, or may actually supervise their children.

Please elaborate how you think adding an adult tag to a web site is an abridgement to free speech. And btw, it's not really my idea, seems I read this proposal some time ago.

Gadfly · « **Reply #31 on:** October 17, 2003, 12:21:59 PM »

.sex is the way it should be, and any site that backdoors or shows porn or explict material that is NOT on a .sex site should be prosecuted. Free Speech does not mean anything, anywhere, anytime.

Sandman · « **Reply #32 on:** October 17, 2003, 12:23:28 PM »

There are programs available to filter and parents can use whatever they like.

vorticon · « **Reply #33 on:** October 17, 2003, 12:25:56 PM »

so we should move all the backroom material in the video store to the front display counter as well thrawn...free speech is only free within the law...ex. your allowed to talk about how the gov. is doing a ****ty assed job and you can talk about how you'r gonna get them outta there legally...but you cant talk about how your gonna sniper his bellybutton (thats treason and murder)

AKIron · « **Reply #34 on:** October 17, 2003, 12:28:10 PM »

My youngest son is taking his first college level class in government. He is truly perplexed about liberals and conservatives. His text indicates that liberals are for more government interactivity and freedom while conservatives are for less government and order. He cannot understand how you can have more government involvement and increase freedom.

He wasn't satisfied with my answer that all liberals suck so I told him to ask his teacher.

Sandman · « **Reply #35 on:** October 17, 2003, 12:33:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
He cannot understand how you can have more government involvement and increase freedom.

That makes two of us.

DmdNexus · « **Reply #36 on:** October 17, 2003, 12:35:53 PM »

>>but you cant talk about how your gonna sniper his bellybutton (thats treason and murder)

Because there's a caveat to American free speech - and it has always been a part of the Bill of Rights and the principles of the Constitution.

America has "responsible" free speech.