I don't mind relearning, so long as they are getting closer to accuracy... They were damn close with the 1.1b patch, then it got all sorts of screwed up with 1.11. Stuff like that happens when you get a whole bunch of people together testing something (the 1.1b patch - everyone tested it) that want to see their favorite plane perform so well because they are convinced when they are behind the stick they should be unbeatable.
To be honest, the 109s perform where they should - IN stick forces, roll rates, and responses in the controls. But that auto engine management went to sh** with 1.11 when it was perfect in 1.1b. I suspect if they put the auto engine mgmt of 1.1b into the rest of the FM data for the 109s in 1.11, the 109s would be back to their BnZ selves again. As it is now, unless you use manual management, you don't get full engine performance.
Then theres the P39, needs to be toned down in several areas. Supposedly will be, once it is - I'll be back to happily using it online.
The 190s are way to damage resistant though, I'm not sure how that happened while they left the P47 to get ripped apart easily.
Then the La5 (all variants) and La7s fall apart a little too easily when they begin to compress. Usually this will happen in level flight. Although I don't care much for the La7 since I don't play servers past 1943, I'd still like it fixed.
It will be interesting to see what 1.2 does, I'm hoping it will be like the last Il2 patch which pretty much fixed everything with maybe 2 or 3 planes (out of 40+) still a little off.
The disappointing thing about that patch though, is that it'll be HUGE. 3 maps or something like that in addition to several new objects and 5 new planes (P51, Ki84, A6M5(b I think), B17 and C47). Quite a task for the 56K to tackle.
-SW