Author Topic: Flatpanel monitor dilemma  (Read 626 times)

Offline Saltty

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« on: October 25, 2003, 10:04:08 AM »
Since I have 5 thumbs on each hand when it comes to anything with a computer my question is the following.
The wife and I want a new system and I would like a big monitor but space is a problem and momma is on a " flat panel" jag.
would a good LCD monitor work for gaming?
If so suggestions?

Saltty
« Last Edit: October 25, 2003, 10:06:09 AM by Saltty »

Offline BB Gun

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2003, 11:20:14 AM »
Just make sure the "response time" is low.  Sub-25 ms.  That's total response time.  NEC makes a 16 ms response time 17" LCD monitor.  Don't remember the model number ATM.  An associate at the office here just bought one.  I'll ask him Monday.

Make sure when you're reading/asking about response times, that the answers you get are TOTAL response time (rise AND fall) and not just 1/2 of the equation.

"Response time" is the time it takes an individual pixel to charge up, get bright and then discharge, and go dark.  To prevent "ghosting" of a fast moving image, you want the response times LOW - especially the "fall" time.

BB
Win7x64/ECS PH-55A Black / Corei7 860 / 8GB Gskill F3-10666CL8D-4GBHK / Westy L2410NM / Radeon 5770 / Corsair 650TX / LG DVD / WD 640 Black AALS / WD 1TB&2TB GRN
My Pics
My daughter

Offline whels

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1517
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2003, 12:12:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BB Gun
Just make sure the "response time" is low.  Sub-25 ms.  That's total response time.  NEC makes a 16 ms response time 17" LCD monitor.  Don't remember the model number ATM.  An associate at the office here just bought one.  I'll ask him Monday.

Make sure when you're reading/asking about response times, that the answers you get are TOTAL response time (rise AND fall) and not just 1/2 of the equation.

"Response time" is the time it takes an individual pixel to charge up, get bright and then discharge, and go dark.  To prevent "ghosting" of a fast moving image, you want the response times LOW - especially the "fall" time.

BB


NEC 1760V   16ms
i have 1 of these, works great.

whels

Offline Saltty

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2003, 07:43:13 PM »
Thanks guys...Mwave has them for $418 I just checked

I thinking I'll using them for our new system .... I hear good comments about them here.
We are going P4.2.8 ...512 ram ...still not sure what to do about a vid card...getting way!!! to many different answers!
Its a big bunch of money for a dumb truck driver like myself
:)

Saltty

Offline BB Gun

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2003, 11:02:57 PM »
Always always always set your price limit for the entire system FIRST.  Then build the best you can for that price.

Give us a budget, and what you think you are going to buy so far, and we'll see what we can do to trick you out.  :)

BB
Win7x64/ECS PH-55A Black / Corei7 860 / 8GB Gskill F3-10666CL8D-4GBHK / Westy L2410NM / Radeon 5770 / Corsair 650TX / LG DVD / WD 640 Black AALS / WD 1TB&2TB GRN
My Pics
My daughter

Offline zmeg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #5 on: October 26, 2003, 12:11:12 AM »
If you want a flat panal with good resilution and high enough refresh rate for gaming, be prepaired to spend about $1500. Test it befor you buy it.

Offline BB Gun

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2003, 01:06:50 AM »
My co-worker is very happy with the NEC mentioned above for gaming - he plays MS combat sim 3, MOHAA, Rally Sport Challenge, and Splinter Cell.  He sees no ghosting that he can detect, and clarity is terrific.  Native resolution is 1280x1024 which is plenty for most gaming purposes.  More resolution really requires a bigger monitor.

BB
Win7x64/ECS PH-55A Black / Corei7 860 / 8GB Gskill F3-10666CL8D-4GBHK / Westy L2410NM / Radeon 5770 / Corsair 650TX / LG DVD / WD 640 Black AALS / WD 1TB&2TB GRN
My Pics
My daughter

Offline Saltty

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2003, 01:06:25 AM »
$1500 is about my budget....we would like not to have to go into the visa and credit line.
My youngest son is a freshman in college this year , Dad is Having sticker shock.:(

Here is what I'm thinking on for a machine

INTEL EXTREME SYSTEMS
(MWAVE Z88-SLS; ABIT IS7; PENTIUM 4 2.8G; MWAVE 1GB (512MBX2); 40GB IDE HDD; 56X CDROM; ATI RADEON 9200 128MB; 1.44 FDD; LITE ON 52/32/52X CDRW; SB LIVE! 5.1; V.90 56K MODEM; PS2 MOUSE/KEYBOARD; XP HOME/OFFICE SB; 3-PC SPKR; ASSEMBLE)

Its $1073.65 + monitor

Saltty

Offline zmeg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2003, 01:29:00 AM »
Is that radeon 9200 a typo? If not you might as well get a cheep flatscreen.

Offline BB Gun

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2003, 08:28:24 PM »
If all you're getting for a sound card is an SB live 5.1, skip it and use the onboard sound.  They're easy to add later if you think you need improvement.

Drop the processor to a 2.4C and then use the savings from those two chagnes to get REAL RAM - a pair of these: http://www.mwave.com/mwave/SpecB/BA19336.html  or this twinpack: http://www.mwave.com/mwave/SpecB/BA19543.html or this twinpack http://www.mwave.com/mwave/doc2/A08636.html or this twinpack http://www.mwave.com/mwave/SpecB/BA08647.html

Ditch the radeon9200.  You'll be throttling the system with it.  Up it to the 9600Pro http://www.mwave.com/mwave/SpecA/AA21950.html or if you can stretch it, the 9700 Pro http://www.mwave.com/mwave/SPECA/AA18510.html

BB
Win7x64/ECS PH-55A Black / Corei7 860 / 8GB Gskill F3-10666CL8D-4GBHK / Westy L2410NM / Radeon 5770 / Corsair 650TX / LG DVD / WD 640 Black AALS / WD 1TB&2TB GRN
My Pics
My daughter

Offline maddog

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 363
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2003, 10:05:51 AM »
I hope someday you can drive a smart truck..........

Offline Animal

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5027
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #11 on: October 27, 2003, 11:37:59 AM »
Remember that a flat panel must run at a native resolution. It is able to scale to other resolutions, but it looks horrible.

Make sure the native resolution is one which you will like, because you better.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2003, 07:05:46 AM »
Very happy with my 25ms 19" Hansol LCD :)

Btw folks, those panels that have a 16ms res time, only actually have 20ms. I have read alot about this and its all in the way you measure the time.

The lowest you can go with real measuring now is 20ms so dont be fooled by 16.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2003, 07:10:48 AM by Nilsen »

Offline HavocTM

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
      • http://www.bops.us
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #13 on: October 31, 2003, 01:52:53 PM »
I have a 19" Planar LCD I bought from Dell and it looks excellent with the Omega drivers and running at native 1280x1024 resolution.  I picked this one up for around $600 I think...

Offline Saltty

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Flatpanel monitor dilemma
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2003, 02:15:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by maddog
I hope someday you can drive a smart truck..........

Sorry I'm NOT on your level of inteligence....If it wasn't for dumb bastards like me you would starve to death.