Author Topic: My USA plane(All military) lists for AH2 (Read 1081 times)

frank3 · « **Reply #15 on:** October 27, 2003, 07:14:23 AM »

I agree with you guys that we need a better scenario, but some better interiors of the planes would be welcome too.
Like have you ever seen the B-17's ball turret or it's waist-gunners compartiment? it looks awfull! so does it's rear gunner comp.

bigjava · « **Reply #16 on:** October 27, 2003, 01:02:00 PM »

no sir!!!
it's TiME to introduce more

ITALY

RUSSIAN

JAPAN

Airplane

to increase Scenario's an CT setting......
.... and do not FORGET That New TOD is going to be played in a 2 country map Guys!!!!

and Why not speaking about

Finland ---> Brewster; fiat g50
Poland----->platz
France----->Morain
Australian--->Boomerang

....in history book they referred at it like second World's WAR

_____________________________ ______________________

frank3 · « **Reply #17 on:** October 27, 2003, 01:50:53 PM »

well the planes need to be famous and familiar with people tho...

Gixer · « **Reply #18 on:** October 30, 2003, 04:58:26 PM »

Cripes, what about the F8F? Awsome plane! Certinly deserve to be perked but what a ride.

...-Gixer
~Hells Angels~

Arlo · « **Reply #19 on:** October 30, 2003, 05:08:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by frank3
well the planes need to be famous and familiar with people tho...

What criteria would you use? Famous and familiar to you? Famous and familiar to someone who lives in Milan, Italy or Tokyo, Japan or even Helsinki, Finland? This is no basis for criteria IMO. I seriously doubt most (or even half) of the AH community was familiar with all of the planes modeled in AH before the signed on to play. I bet some discovered the fun of flying something they either had either no or a very casual knowledge of before they played.

I think part of the fun of a WWII based online air combat sim can be that of discovery and education. If we limit it to just the planes 100% of the potential customer base is familiar with then it's time to break out the axes and start cuttin' back.

MajorDay · « **Reply #20 on:** October 30, 2003, 09:26:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gixer
Cripes, what about the F8F? Awsome plane! Certinly deserve to be perked but what a ride.

...-Gixer
~Hells Angels~

~~Heck, Grumman F8F-3 Bearcat never went in combat in WWII(I think but if someone know then prove it) and also F7F Tigercat didnt enter combat during WWII either.~~

Tarmac · « **Reply #21 on:** October 30, 2003, 11:55:20 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
What criteria would you use? Famous and familiar to you? Famous and familiar to someone who lives in Milan, Italy or Tokyo, Japan or even Helsinki, Finland? This is no basis for criteria IMO. I seriously doubt most (or even half) of the AH community was familiar with all of the planes modeled in AH before the signed on to play. I bet some discovered the fun of flying something they either had either no or a very casual knowledge of before they played.

I think part of the fun of a WWII based online air combat sim can be that of discovery and education. If we limit it to just the planes 100% of the potential customer base is familiar with then it's time to break out the axes and start cuttin' back.

Right on Arlo. I thought I knew WWII airplanes before I started playing AH, but the amount I've learned is amazing. And then guys like Batz start spouting info, and I realize that I still know just about nothing.

Nilsen · « **Reply #22 on:** October 31, 2003, 03:28:56 AM »

wishlist is below...

thank you

-ammo- · « **Reply #23 on:** October 31, 2003, 06:41:43 AM »

I like that list, just move the P-47M up to the top please:D

Innominate · « **Reply #24 on:** October 31, 2003, 08:16:36 AM »

P-39Q is one of the best options for a new plane. Widely used by the russians, it would best be done with a russian paint scheme. It also fills one of the few remaining gaps in the US planeset. It's fairly fast, a good low level performer, with a weapons loadout that would make a tiffy think twice about a HO. (Two or four .50mg's, and a 37mm cannon) A needed historical plane, with the added bonus of being quite competitive in the MA.

Can we drop the damn f7f, f8f, and p80 crap? If it didn't shoot something down in ww2, it doesnt belong in AH.

MajorDay · « **Reply #25 on:** October 31, 2003, 03:55:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Innominate
Can we drop the damn f7f, f8f, and p80 crap? If it didn't shoot something down in ww2, it doesnt belong in AH.

I know Lockheed P-80 and Grumman F7F-4 & F8F-3 dont enter service during WWII, but they didnt enter the combat and they all too-late. All of them did see the combat during Korean War and they were successfull i believe.

Raptor · « **Reply #26 on:** October 31, 2003, 05:21:29 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MajorDay
All of them did see the combat during Korean War and they were successfull i believe.

But thats the point, they were successful in the KOREAN war, not WW2.

MajorDay · « **Reply #27 on:** October 31, 2003, 05:59:04 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Raptor01
But thats the point, they were successful in the KOREAN war, not WW2.

That what I said, Raptor01. All of them did excellent service.

whels · « **Reply #28 on:** October 31, 2003, 06:03:11 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MajorDay
I know Lockheed P-80 and Grumman F7F-4 & F8F-3 dont enter service during WWII, but they didnt enter the combat and they all too-late. All of them did see the combat during Korean War and they were successfull i believe.

F8F-1 was on combat duty in WW2 though, with VF 18 and 19
aboard the USS Langley.

i think any plane that was in production and in squad service
before end of ww2, should be in AH. but planes like the F8F-1
would be some of the last to be added after the more
produced, and used 1s.

whels

whels · « **Reply #29 on:** October 31, 2003, 06:04:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Innominate
.

Can we drop the damn f7f, f8f, and p80 crap? If it didn't shoot something down in ww2, it doesnt belong in AH.

by that definition, alot of pilots in ww2 were just pilots not
combat pilots.