Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: mora on August 12, 2005, 11:16:37 AM

Title: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: mora on August 12, 2005, 11:16:37 AM
It was better the way it were. Of course it wasn't realistic to survive 400 mph ditches, but now it's impossible to survive above a certain speed which is also unrealistic. Also there shouldn't be an instant death when hitting a tree or any other object.
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: slayer1 on June 19, 2010, 10:20:28 PM
i agree +1  :aok

~slayer~
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: LLogann on June 19, 2010, 11:00:25 PM
So a WWII era plane going 98mph that hits a tree................

What is the probability that the pilot survives?

Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: bravoa8 on June 19, 2010, 11:09:19 PM
I sense.... (http://media.bigoo.ws/content/smile/miscellaneous/smile_147.gif) Flame war
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: gyrene81 on June 19, 2010, 11:38:49 PM
It was better the way it were. Of course it wasn't realistic to survive 400 mph ditches, but now it's impossible to survive above a certain speed which is also unrealistic. Also there shouldn't be an instant death when hitting a tree or any other object.
I have to wonder when was the last plane crash you survived at 150mph or faster. Ever hit a tree at 60mph? Imagine hitting that tree at 200mph. It's more realistic than you think.
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: RTHolmes on June 20, 2010, 12:29:43 AM
(http://cdn0.knowyourmeme.com/i/28439/original/15209d1247204376-indian-army-vs-american-army-holy_necroposting_batman.jpg?1259372664)
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: guncrasher on June 20, 2010, 09:03:46 AM
I have seen now planes crash at 200 and above in low furballing and get a ditch.  This is after having no wings or tail.


Semp
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: AWwrgwy on June 20, 2010, 09:10:33 AM
I have seen now planes crash at 200 and above in low furballing and get a ditch.  This is after having no wings or tail.


Semp

And you know their going that fast how?

Got film?


wrongway
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: The Fugitive on June 20, 2010, 09:11:14 AM
The modeling has changed at least once since this thread was posted 5 YEARS AGO !







....oh and IN   :neener:
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: gyrene81 on June 20, 2010, 10:33:17 AM
DOH!!!  :rofl  :rofl  :rofl

Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: whipster22 on June 20, 2010, 10:44:14 AM
In
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: grizz441 on June 20, 2010, 11:33:52 AM
I have seen now planes crash at 200 and above in low furballing and get a ditch.  This is after having no wings or tail.
Semp

No chance, if you hit the ground going faster than 150 it's insta death.
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: LLogann on June 20, 2010, 11:37:46 AM
HOLY SMOKES FugitiveMan...  When I replied, I didn't even see that......   :rofl

The modeling has changed at least once since this thread was posted 5 YEARS AGO !



....oh and IN   :neener:

Somebody needs a smack....  (http://www.jesseshunting.com/forums/images/smilies/smiley_smack_paddle_ani.gif)
i agree +1  :aok

~slayer~

INcredible!
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: Motherland on June 20, 2010, 11:57:38 AM
The modeling has changed at least once since this thread was posted 5 YEARS AGO !







....oh and IN   :neener:
I don't think so, you still get killed instantly if you touch any part of your plane to any stationary object provided you're going 150 miles an hour or faster.
Title: Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
Post by: 321BAR on June 20, 2010, 12:01:23 PM
(http://www.contrast.ie/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/locked-door-sign.jpg)

have you??? :aok