Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: acesandeights on August 01, 2008, 12:04:58 PM

Title: new bomber/trasport
Post by: acesandeights on August 01, 2008, 12:04:58 PM
ok so my friend and i have this awsome idea and we hope all the people that play aceshigh will like this idea.
we were thinking it takes for ever to get from one place to a nother in a jeep or tank. so why not make a four engined plane that can carry five vehicals at a time. as well as field supplys and vehical supplies. also there is a bombay that you can open when you hit the o button and people can drive their tanks and jeeps in the bomb bay. well tell me what you think. and my friend and i hope that you guys down at high tech creations
accept our idea and make it a part of your game  :).      p.s. please support this idea.  :) bye!
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Hornet33 on August 01, 2008, 12:10:28 PM
Uh no
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: halo342 on August 01, 2008, 12:16:01 PM
more information on the plane you speak of or it never existed
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: bobtom on August 01, 2008, 12:19:53 PM
No.
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: angelsandair on August 01, 2008, 12:22:52 PM
Do you mean the Me323? It'll have to wait 2 weeks like CT.  :cool:
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: black heart1 on August 01, 2008, 12:31:43 PM
i know who your friend is 357359 hi it is me 357359  :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) this a good idea
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: spit16nooby on August 01, 2008, 01:39:39 PM
Wow there were planes in world war 2 that could carry 5 tigers holy crap thats amazing.(dude they will only put real stuff in the game too bad there wasn't those kinds of planes I would be dieing for one)
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Bruv119 on August 01, 2008, 01:46:46 PM
are you one of them guys that drives cross country and doesnt use the vehicle "spawn points"

I remember one guy on the furball lake map driving LVTs constantly as far as he could across the lake and eventually getting killed everytime for hours!

Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: BaldEagl on August 01, 2008, 01:47:32 PM
Just use the spawn points and pretend some big imaginary plane flew you there.
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: JHerne on August 01, 2008, 01:48:38 PM
The only aircraft even remotely capable of carrying a tank was the Messerschmitt 323 Gigant, and that was usually limited to a Panzer I/II type. It couldn't carry a Panzer III or IV, so that rules that out completely. Six engines, damn near impossible to fly, and if you think Goons are cannon-fodder, imagine something the size of a modern-day airliner lumbering along NOE at 120 knots.

If you want the ability to move large amounts of supplies, vehicles, etc., your only historically accurate option is a freighter or landing craft, LCT, LST, LCV, etc.

It's great that people are excited and come up with new ideas, but I think folks should research their requests thoroughly and suggest things that will fit into the parameters of the game, not just locally, but globally, and then formulate the need for a new type of vehicle. If there's something already in the game that can do the job, why replicate and reinvent the wheel? This involves either knowing WW2 military technology and history, or researching it.

Just my opinion...

J
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Spikes on August 01, 2008, 03:52:11 PM
No...
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: acesandeights on August 01, 2008, 05:40:36 PM
its a b29 super fortress. only if i knew how to post a picture id show you guys but i heard on the military channel it could carry 2 willy jeeps and 1 sherman farret tank and bombs.
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: acesandeights on August 01, 2008, 05:43:48 PM
the b29 super fortress
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: SKYGUNS on August 01, 2008, 05:58:02 PM
more information on the plane you speak of or it never existed

Correct me if I'm wrong, But it does exist just not common. Brits had gliders that even carried light tanks. And I'm sure the US/germans had it but it wasn't used too commonly...
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: blkmgc on August 01, 2008, 06:11:00 PM
OMG, my heads going to explode.
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Motherland on August 01, 2008, 06:12:50 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, But it does exist just not common. Brits had gliders that even carried light tanks. And I'm sure the US/germans had it but it wasn't used too commonly...
Quote
so why not make a four engined plane that can carry five vehicals at a time. as well as field supplys and vehical supplies.

Nothing near this capacity ever existed.

its a b29 super fortress. only if i knew how to post a picture id show you guys but i heard on the military channel it could carry 2 willy jeeps and 1 sherman farret tank and bombs.
No, it couldn't. The B29's carrying capacity was 20,000 lbs of ordinance. The Sherman weighed almost 67,000 pounds and 1 Willy's Jeep weighed 2,300 lbs.
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: JHerne on August 01, 2008, 06:48:41 PM
Aces and Eights...

While I applaud your enthusiasm, don't try to convince me through PMs that a B-29 will carry 6 tanks.

B-29s were used as transports, carrying fuel tanks in their bombbays to supply the bombing B-29s in China with fuel before we took the Marianas, Tinian, and Saipan.

Please...don't rely on Wikipedia to make you a military historian. It's embarrassing. Chances are I had my Masters in military history before you were even born (1994).

We can do the mental Lufbery if you want to, but you're sorely outclassed my boy.

JEff
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: JHerne on August 01, 2008, 06:53:33 PM
And the next time you want to send a PM with insults, I'll pass it on to the folks up above and we'll see what they say about your behavior.

See, if I were wrong, people here would be telling me that I'm wrong...but they're not, they're tell you, but you're not listening...

Grow up and leave the thinking to those of us who can do it without pulling a groin muscle.

Jeff
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: balance1 on August 02, 2008, 06:00:22 PM
I LIKE TURTLES!
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: ian5440 on August 02, 2008, 06:02:54 PM
I LIKE TURTLES!

WTF??  :huh
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: black heart1 on August 02, 2008, 07:08:18 PM
give him a break it is a good idea
besides plenty of crazy stuff was going on during ww2 someone must have made plans for some thing like this
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Motherland on August 02, 2008, 07:09:04 PM
give him a break it is a good idea
Not really.
Quote
besides plenty of crazy stuff was going on during ww2 someone must have made plans for some thing like this
Nope.
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Selino631 on August 02, 2008, 10:45:02 PM
more information on the plane you speak of or it never existed
acctualy..(http://www.fortunecity.com/tattooine/farmer/120/megigant.jpg)
The Me 323 was a large German transport, that could possibley do this.
(http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/AC/aircraft/Messerschmitt-Me323/IMAGES-Me323/Me-323-doors.jpg) It could carry 130 troops or 12 tons of equipment. also armed with 18 7.92mm MG 81 Machine Guns. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ME_323 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ME_323)
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Motherland on August 02, 2008, 10:55:52 PM
The most the Gigant could carry was a single light tank (Panzer I, II). No where near a Sherman and two Willy's Jeeps.
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Rino on August 03, 2008, 12:09:09 AM
     I find it difficult to believe that one lame troll could hook so many fish
so easily.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Cthulhu on August 04, 2008, 12:51:08 PM
     I find it difficult to believe that one lame troll could hook so many fish
so easily.  :rolleyes:
I'd agree with you in a heartbeat, but unfortunately there really are people sufficiently ignorant out there to post this crap. (and keep posting it):confused:
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: ian5440 on August 04, 2008, 12:54:37 PM
I'd agree with you in a heartbeat, but unfortunately there really are people sufficiently ignorant out there to post this crap. (and keep posting it):confused:

but are we just as ignorant by responding??  :D :D
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Cthulhu on August 04, 2008, 04:54:48 PM
but are we just as ignorant by responding??  :D :D
Maybe. I was responding to Rino's comment. Not gonna waste time commenting on the original poster's silly request. So technically, Rino and I are just third-parties watching this fishing expedition.:D  You wanna sit and watch with us, or chase the bait?
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: zoozoo on August 04, 2008, 06:18:15 PM
NO
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: meddog on August 05, 2008, 01:00:12 PM
I votte for the Spruce Goose :) :lol :lol
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: *PAPA* on August 05, 2008, 01:55:50 PM
I am calling out Troll.  Its quite apparent this account was created by a non member of Ace's and Eights to troll with.
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: ian5440 on August 05, 2008, 01:57:40 PM
Maybe. I was responding to Rino's comment. Not gonna waste time commenting on the original poster's silly request. So technically, Rino and I are just third-parties watching this fishing expedition.:D  You wanna sit and watch with us, or chase the bait?

i got it  :D

i like watching and making stupid little comments here and there  :D
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: 100goon on August 05, 2008, 02:08:56 PM
I votte for the Spruce Goose :) :lol :lol
'



1.) was put into flight after WWII 2.) never saw service in any war
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: ian5440 on August 05, 2008, 02:10:24 PM
'



1.) was put into flight after WWII 2.) never saw service in any war

i think he might have been joking hence the smiley faces
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: 100goon on August 05, 2008, 02:16:01 PM
i think he might have been joking hence the smiley faces

so what we on these forms are being serius just like that huge long thing io just wrote in antoher catorgory
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: ian5440 on August 05, 2008, 02:19:05 PM
so what we on these forms are being serius just like that huge long thing io just wrote in antoher catorgory

 :huh
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: Motherland on August 05, 2008, 02:20:39 PM
so what we on these forms are being serius just like that huge long thing io just wrote in antoher catorgory
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/Seriousbusiness2.jpg)
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: meddog on August 05, 2008, 03:28:44 PM
'



1.) was put into flight after WWII 2.) never saw service in any war

Yes I'm very well aware of its history. I was making a joke
Title: Re: new bomber/trasport
Post by: black heart1 on October 01, 2008, 07:28:19 PM
mother land give us a break your not some all seeing eye