Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: SkyRock on September 18, 2008, 10:10:02 AM
-
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
ANCHORAGE, Alaska - A campaign spokesman says Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin won’t speak with an investigator hired by lawmakers to look into the firing of her public safety commissioner.
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
"a Republican dominated Legislature voted unanimouslyto proceed with the investigation by special investigator Stephen Branchflower"
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
McCain campaign spokesman Ed O’Callaghan told a news conference Monday that the governor, the Republican nominee for vice president, will not cooperate.
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
Earlier she claimed to be innocent and said she would assist in the investigation. Now since the findings seem to implicate both she and her husband in a felony, she now refuses to cooperate with the Republican led investigation.
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”,............... except if you have something that might stick, then go mask yourself.
:rofl
-
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”,............... except if you have something that might stick, then go mask yourself.
:rofl
Mark my words: Palin Derangement Syndrome (see http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/09/18/cstillwell.DTL (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/09/18/cstillwell.DTL)) and the NRA will be the downfall Dalai Bama.
-
Mark my words: Palin Derangement Syndrome (see http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/09/18/cstillwell.DTL (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/09/18/cstillwell.DTL)) and the NRA will be the downfall Dalai Bama.
:rofl no hate, just trying to see if she's a man....err.. half/man...err....woman or her words! :aok
:noid
-
Hey look another "look at me!!! LOOK At me!!" thread from Skydork.....
I'ts like your trying to be like Mac, but less funnny.
-
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
sounds like a sex tape to me... ;)
-
Namecalling... check.
Ignoring the original post..... check.
O'Club checklist complete. Ready for political discussion.
-
The worst kind of person is a hypocrite!
Palin - "I am for change......unless that change affects my power."
-
she now refuses to cooperate with the Republican led investigation.
Kinda depends on how you look at it, Sen. Hollis French is a democrat and the manager of the investigation. Although the committee is made up of 10 republicans and 4 democrats.
As far as refusing to cooperate? I can understand how that changed. Troopergate has become so politicized it is not surprising she is now unlikely to cooperate. (Yes, unlikely, not refusing, is the word used by the McCain camp.)
The McCain campaign said on Monday that Palin, who was not subpoenaed, was unlikely to cooperate.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD938QSNO0
Now since the findings seem to implicate both she and her husband in a felony
What findings? Are you privy to information the rest of us don't have? I'm not seeing any new information on the investigation itself. In fact, right now, the investigation is still ongoing, they aren't even done interviewing people yet. Although the guy that was fired says he was not pressured to fire the state trooper, that has not changed.
-
Namecalling... check.
Ignoring the original post..... check.
O'Club checklist complete. Ready for political discussion.
I didn't see any name calling...... :confused:
-
As far as refusing to cooperate? I can understand how that changed. Troopergate has become so politicized it is not surprising she is now unlikely to cooperate. (Yes, unlikely, not refusing, is the word used by the McCain camp.)
Exactly! "Unlikely to" and "will not" are two different things.
What findings? Are you privy to information the rest of us don't have? I'm not seeing any new information on the investigation itself. In fact, right now, the investigation is still ongoing, they aren't even done interviewing people yet. Although the guy that was fired says he was not pressured to fire the state trooper, that has not changed.
Waits for SkyRock's answer to this....but I am aware that he is probably unable to answer it so I am prepared for the "whatever twitboi :aok" response...sad, really.
-
I didn't see any name calling...... :confused:
RPM is a poopyhead.
Fixed.
-
RPM is a poopyhead.
Fixed.
There....now we have some decent name calling going on here. :devil
-
the committee is made up of 10 republicans and 4 democrats.
As far as refusing to cooperate? I can understand
yeah, I always say, if running on the platform of, "hold me accountable", I guess the right thing to do is refuse to cooperate with a legal inquiry. :rolleyes:
-
I dont get it...if she has broken a law then charge her with a crime and have a trial. Otherwise this is just another waste of taxper money and isn't worth participating in.
-
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
ANCHORAGE, Alaska - A campaign spokesman says Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin won’t speak with an investigator hired by lawmakers to look into the firing of her public safety commissioner.
She was not subpoenaed. She is not required to. Perhaps the real reason she is now unwilling to talk, is that Democrat Senator Hollis French has turned the investigation into a political media circus. Maybe had he conducted the investigation with in the confines of the committee instead of in the court of public opinion and media smear, she might be more willing to cooperate.
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
"a Republican dominated Legislature voted unanimouslyto proceed with the investigation by special investigator Stephen Branchflower"
Actually, wrong again. Several legislators voted against it.
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
McCain campaign spokesman Ed O’Callaghan told a news conference Monday that the governor, the Republican nominee for vice president, will not cooperate.
"The McCain campaign said on Monday that Palin, who was not subpoenaed, was unlikely to cooperate." Taken from AP article http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD938QSNO0 (http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD938QSNO0)
Skyrock, if you are going to quote something, at least quote it without changing the words. It make you seem so much more believable and non-biased.
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”
Earlier she claimed to be innocent and said she would assist in the investigation. Now since the findings seem to implicate both she and her husband in a felony, she now refuses to cooperate with the Republican led investigation.
There have been no findings released. Instead, there has been a flurry of democrat activity trying to dig up dirt on her so they can smear her before the election. What is fact though is this:
1: Trooper Wooten had a domestic Violence Order issued by a judge against him to protect his estranged wife.
2: Trooper Wooten tazed his eleven year old step son.
3. Trooper Wooten was found to be driving a cruiser with an open beer in 2004.
4. In a letter to DPS employees announcing his termination, Walter Monegan wrote that he was an at-will employee and knew his dismissal was "a possibility ever present", and that he had been advised that the governor wanted to take DPS in a "different direction. The next day during an interview he said the dismissal came out of the blue.
5. On August 28, in an interview with Anchorage Daily News, Monegan said, "For the record, no one ever said fire Wooten. Not the governor. Not Todd. Not any of the other staff. What they said directly was more along the lines of 'This isn't a person that we would want to be representing our state troopers.'"
6: On September 15, 2008, McCain/Palin campaign spokeswoman Meg Stapleton held a news conference at which she accused Monegan of "egregious insubordination," "obstructionist conduct" and a "brazen refusal" to follow proper channels for requesting money. Asked why someone with a history of insubordination would be offered the leadership of the Alaska Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Stapleton said that without having to deal with a budget, Monegan would be able to focus on alcohol abuse issues. She added that Palin "respects the fact that [Monegan] was respected in the community"
This clearly indicates one thing. That Trooper Wooten should not have been in law enforcement after his repeated violations of department policy, and that Walter Monegan should not have sent an email the day before he lied in an interview.
Palin - “Hold me accountable.”,............... except if you have something that might stick, then go mask yourself.
:rofl
Maybe you should stop trying to smear Palin based on some BS crap cooked up by the Democrats and instead just dig through her political past to find something that glaringly says she should not be VP. My bet is you can't which is why you resort to continuing a smear campaign that is absolutely low class. Which in my opinion smears you along with it.
-
I dont get it...if she has broken a law then charge her with a crime and have a trial. Otherwise this is just another waste of taxper money and isn't worth participating in.
If she used unofficial e-mails to communicate details that prove she broke the law, then it will take time, and possibly her cooperation to get to the bottom of the mess. Since, she has deemed a "republican led" investigation to be "too political", she just refuses to cooperate. If she is innocent, then why not cooperate?
or to use your words, "I don't get it, if she hasnt broken a law, then why not cooperate?" :aok
-
Hey look another "look at me!!! LOOK At me!!" thread from Skydork.....
I'ts like your trying to be like Mac, but less funnny.
:rofl
-
The worst kind of person is a hypocrite!
Palin - "I am for change......unless that change affects my power."
(snickers)
-
Since, she has deemed a "republican led" investigation to be "too political", she just refuses to cooperate.
Wrong again. Hollis French, state senator and democrat, is the leader.
Care to stick to the facts, or would you prefer to keep making this up as you go along?
-
(http://www.netpond.com/images/smilies/stompspam.gif)(http://premium1.uploadit.org/chewpilla/emocions/image11.gif)(http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php?action=dlattach;attach=5657;type=avatar)< :aok
-
If she is innocent, then why not cooperate?
Why cooperate with something that is shaping up to be a smear campaign? Let's not forget, the investigation is being led by a democrat.....(there are 14 on the committee but the leader is a democrat.)
If she used unofficial e-mails to communicate details that prove she broke the law,
We don't know that as a fact yet either. She may have, she might not have. In light of the fact that so many things that have been said about her have turned out to be bogus, I think I'll wait for more information, it is the reasonable thing to do. :)
-
Obviously Skyrock can not concern himself with the facts or back up his blatant lies.
Very petty and juvenile. I really wish this forum had the ignore option.
-
She was not subpoenaed. She is not required to. Perhaps the real reason she is now unwilling to talk, is that Democrat Senator Hollis French has turned the investigation into a political media circus. Maybe had he conducted the investigation with in the confines of the committee instead of in the court of public opinion and media smear, she might be more willing to cooperate.
Actually, wrong again. Several legislators voted against it.
yeah, before they voted for it. :rofl Several as in what? 3? 2? :rofl
"The McCain campaign said on Monday that Palin, who was not subpoenaed, was unlikely to cooperate." Taken from AP article http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD938QSNO0 (http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD938QSNO0)
Skyrock, if you are going to quote something, at least quote it without changing the words. It make you seem so much more believable and non-biased.
ANCHORAGE, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is unlikely to speak with an independent counsel hired by Alaska lawmakers to review the firing of her public safety commissioner, a spokesman for Republican presidential candidate John McCain said Monday. Spokesman Ed O Callaghan initially said Palin, the Republican nominee for vice president, would not testify as part of the probe"
He did say, "she would not testify", he just changed his words later. :aok
dig through her political past to find something that glaringly says she should not be VP. My bet is you can't
I've seen enough to know I don't like her, she's a wacko nut case with a thirst for power.
*Once in office, Governor Palin decided to continue
litigation that seeks to overturn every subsistence fishing determination the federal government has ever made in Alaska. (State of Alaska v. Norton, 3:05-cv-0158- HRH (D.
Ak).) In pressing this case, Palin decided against using the Attorney General (which usually handles State litigation) and instead continued contracting with Senator Ted Stevens' brother-in-law' s law firm (Birch, Horton, Bittner & Cherot).
The goal of Palin's law suit is to invalidate all the
subsistence fishing regulations the federal government has issued to date to protect Native fishing, and to force the courts instead to take over the roll of setting subsistence regulations. Palin's law suit seeks to diminish subsistence fishing rights in order to expand sport and commercial fishing.
**Palin has also sought to invalidate critical
determinations the Federal Subsistence Board has made regarding customary and traditional uses of game, specifically to take hunting opportunities away from Native subsistence villagers and thereby enhance sport hunting.
Palin's attack here on subsistence has focused on the
Ahtna Indian people in Chistochina. Although the federal district court has rejected Palin's challenge, she has carried on an appeal that was argued in August 2008. (State
of Alaska v. Fleagle, No. 07-35723 (9th Cir.).)
In both hunting and fishing matters, Palin has continued uninterrupted the policies initiated by the former Governor Frank Murkowski Administration, challenging hunting and fishing protections that Native people depend upon for their
subsistence way of life in order to enhance sport fishing and hunting opportunities. Palin's lawsuits are a direct attack on the core way of life of Native Tribes in rural Alaska.
***Given past court rulings affirming the federally
recognized tribal status of Alaska Native villages, Palin does not technically challenge that status. But Palin argues that Alaska Tribes have no authority to act as sovereigns, despite their recognition.
So extreme is Palin on tribal sovereignty issues that she has sought to block tribes from exercising any authority whatsoever even over the welfare of Native children, adhering to a 2004 legal opinion issued by the former Murkowski Administration that no such jurisdiction exists (except when a state court transfers a matter to a tribal court).
Both the state courts and the federal courts have struck down Palin's policy of refusing to recognize the sovereign authority of Alaska Tribes to address issues involving Alaska Native children. Native Village of Tanana v. State of Alaska, 3AN-04-12194 CI (judgment entered Aug. 26, 2008) (Ak. Super. Ct.); Native Kaltag Tribal Council v.DHHS, No. 3:06-cv-00211- TMB (D. Ak.), pending on appeal No
08-35343 (9th Cir.)). Nonetheless, Palin's policy of
refusing to recognize Alaska tribal sovereignty remains unchanged.
****Palin has refused to accord proper respect to Alaska
Native languages and voters by refusing to provide language assistance to Yup'ik speaking Alaska Native voters. As a result, Palin was just ordered by a special three-judge panel of federal judges to provide various forms of voter assistance to Yup'ik voters residing in southwest Alaska. Nick v. Bethel, No. 3:07-cv-0098- TMB (D. Ak.) (Order
entered July 30, 2008). Citing years of State neglect, Palin was ordered to provide trained poll workers who are bilingual in English and Yup'ik; sample ballots in written Yup'ik; a written Yup'ik glossary of
election terms; consultation with local Tribes to ensure the accuracy of Yup'ik translations; a Yup'ik language coordinator; and pre-election and post-election reports to the court to track the State's efforts.
In sum, measured against some the rights that are most fundamental to Alaska Native Tribes - the subsistence way of life, tribal sovereignty and voting rights - Palin's record is a failure.
She's a hate filled moron. Plain and simple. :aok
-
<snip>
I am a hate filled moron. Plain and simple. :aok
Fixed.
-
So based on her decision to review the roll of subsistence fishing and hunting of native tribes and the refusal to provide interpreters to voters, you feel she is unfit to lead.
She has been ordered to do so with regards to language assistance and is complying, why not let the review be completed and facts be presented to back up your cut and paste frenzy.
Maybe, her concern over their hunting and fishing practices borders on something important like the collapse of an ecosystem whereby they (the natives) would no longer be able to be self reliant. Perhaps she may want them to change their practices so that does not happen...?
-
Maybe, her concern over their hunting and fishing practices borders on something important like the collapse of an ecosystem whereby they (the natives) would no longer be able to be self reliant. Perhaps she may want them to change their practices so that does not happen...?
An entire herd of caribou was annihilated by *subsistence hunters* while I was stationed in Alaska. Game Wardens kept patrolling with aircraft trying to assure the survival of the last 25 Caribou in the herd. Unfortunately, they were not in time to stop several native hunters from killing the last 25 caribou. Those individuals annihilated an entire herd with no thought to the future.
I am sure there is more to this story than what Skyrock is telling us.
-
BAH! didnt read the full topic, thought palin was looking for someone to hold her :uhoh
-
I think what skycrock is trying to say is....
"my boy is getting his butt kicked by a wo...wo... woman.. and I got nuthin"
lazs
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiIP_KDQmXs
-
Wrong again. Hollis French, state senator and democrat, is the leader.
Care to stick to the facts, or would you prefer to keep making this up as you go along?
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa223/Skyrock67/stawman.jpg)
-
Why cooperate with something that is shaping up to be a smear campaign? Let's not forget, the investigation is being led by a democrat.....(there are 14 on the committee but the leader is a democrat.)
So, there are more republicans on the committe than dems.
We don't know that as a fact yet either. She may have, she might not have. In light of the fact that so many things that have been said about her have turned out to be bogus, I think I'll wait for more information, it is the reasonable thing to do. :)
go ahead :aok
-
So based on her decision to review the roll of subsistence fishing and hunting of native tribes and the refusal to provide interpreters to voters, you feel she is unfit to lead.
yes, you've got it. :aok
-
I think what skycrock is trying to say is....
"my boy is getting his butt kicked by a wo...wo... woman.. and I got nuthin"
lazs
My boy, isn't running. Sorry! :aok
-
yes, you've got it. :aok
Wow, you are simply amazing.
Perhaps you might want to read a little more into the issue instead of just cutting and pasting. You are going beyond looking like a fool to actually being one.
-
Wow, you are simply amazing.
Perhaps you might want to read a little more into the issue instead of just cutting and pasting. You are going beyond looking like a fool to actually being one.
You're taking BBS too seriously. :aok
I mean your side has over 80-95% in here, why should one poster bother you so much. I dont like Palin at all in any way, much as I dont like Obama, I wished there were a candidate that had a chance that fit me, but there isnt one. I am more to the left than conservatives, and way to far to the right for liberals. So, let me post in peace, and you can just ignore it if you don't like it. :aok
-
I would like to say... that I like this poster!
(http://stumblerz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/s911_complete_moron.jpg)
No, no links to support this, it's just the way I feel! :aok :aok :aok
-
I would like to say... that I like this poster!
(http://stumblerz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/s911_complete_moron.jpg)
No, no links to support this, it's just the way I feel! :aok :aok :aok
:rofl
political debating, I might not disagree with you, but no moron here bud. My IQ is safe and sound just below the boiling point of water at the top of Mount Everest! :aok
-
:rofl
political debating, I might not disagree with you, but no moron here bud. My IQ is safe and sound just below the boiling point of water at the top of Mount Everest! :aok
LOL! I was very careful not to direct my post at any particular individual, but I'm sure glad you took the bait!
Hook, line, and sinker! :rofl :rofl :rofl
-
You're taking BBS too seriously. :aok
I mean your side has over 80-95% in here, why should one poster bother you so much. I dont like Palin at all in any way, much as I dont like Obama, I wished there were a candidate that had a chance that fit me, but there isnt one. I am more to the left than conservatives, and way to far to the right for liberals. So, let me post in peace, and you can just ignore it if you don't like it. :aok
I don't take very much over here seriously, other than when people post half truths and lies. Then it becomes a pet peeve of mine.
A word of advice. You may fly a cartoon airplane really well, but you do not make a great debater.
-
Palin hates Natives so much that she married one...
-
Skycaps Dork Septum
Anagram of SkyRock Das Muppets
:rofl :rofl :rofl :aok
-
you do not make a great debater.
don't care to, but I do not intentionally post lies. I ask if I'm not sure about something. Things I post in here are to get the debate going. :aok
-
i don't care what anyone says about her..She stole Obama's thunder an that's good enough for me.
-
don't care to, but I do not intentionally post lies. I ask if I'm not sure about something. Things I post in here are to get the debate going. :aok
That's one way of putting it.
Another would be that you are trolling half-truths in the attempt to slander a decent woman.
-
That's one way of putting it.
Another would be that you are trolling half-truths in the attempt to slander a decent woman.
something you won't ever do ?
-
Things I post in here are to get the debate going. :aok
SkyRock is teh...
(http://img.printfection.com/14/109878/wflGY.jpg)
NOT!
-
Palin hates Natives so much that she married one...
1/8th :rofl Makes you wonder why she'd want to commercialize their hunting grounds.
-
something you won't ever do ?
What have I posted that is incorrect?
-
...but I do not intentionally post lies.
Nope, you don't....instead you fling as much toejam as you can.
You are a moronic troll.
-
That's one way of putting it.
Another would be that you are trolling half-truths in the attempt to slander a decent woman.
When I'm convinced she's a decent woman, I'll stop. Right now I think she's a power hungry wretch of a religous whacko nut-job willing to sell anyone out for power. :aok
-
1/8th :rofl
What is the official fraction that makes you native?
-
When I'm convinced she's a decent woman, I'll stop. Right now I think she's a power hungry wretch of a religous whacko nut-job willing to sell anyone out for power. :aok
Well, then just remain content with the fact that I will refute all the BS you fling that is not truthful or is deceptive.
:aok
-
Nope, you don't....instead you fling as much poop as you can.
You are a moronic troll.
:rofl
you are an iceberg!(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa223/Skyrock67/peniceberg.jpg)
-
"Debate or debating is a formal method of interactive and position representational argument. Debate is a broader form of argument than logical argument, which only examine the consistency from axiom, and factual argument, which only examine what is or isn't the case. Though logical consistency (FAIL), factual accuracy (FAIL), as well as some emotional appeal to audience (EPIC FAIL), are important elements of the art of persuasion, in debating, one side often prevails over the other side by presenting superior "context" and/or framework of the issue (SUPERIOR EPIC FAIL)."
-
Well, then just remain content with the fact that I will refute all the BS you fling that is not truthful or is deceptive.
:aok
Have at it, I enjoy it, or I wouldn't be posting in here. :aok
-
:rofl
you are an iceberg!(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa223/Skyrock67/peniceberg.jpg)
Freudian slip?
(chewing ice more common in the south :aok)
-
Some of yall do not get it. SR likes to play to an audience and place bait out there to see if he gets any nibbles, while at the same time he is laughing his hinny off while his children look at him funny :)
P.S. if that is what I think it is (the pic)... shouldn't it be smaller in that situation?
-
Some of yall do not get it. SR likes to play to an audience and place bait out there to see if he gets any nibbles, while at the same time he is laughing his hinny off while his children look at him funny :)
That would be fine if he didn't claim he was engaging in debate. We all know he is...
(http://www.lidenstidning.se/internet_2007/070707_trollnatta/TROLL.jpg) - ING
-
Stop feeding it then LOL!
-
"Debate or debating is a formal method of interactive and position representational argument. Debate is a broader form of argument than logical argument, which only examine the consistency from axiom, and factual argument, which only examine what is or isn't the case. Though logical consistency (FAIL), factual accuracy (FAIL), as well as some emotional appeal to audience (EPIC FAIL), are important elements of the art of persuasion, in debating, one side often prevails over the other side by presenting superior "context" and/or framework of the issue (SUPERIOR EPIC FAIL)."
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa223/Skyrock67/blah.jpg)
I am fully aware of the definition of a debate. If I wanted to truly debate something, I would have to actually care enough about it.
You should already have read my many posts about how this is entertaining to me. The fact that you follow my threads like a horny puppy lets me know that I own you here.(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa223/Skyrock67/anklehump.jpg)
The righties on this board are like gang hordlettes in the main arena. They talk mucho crap of how they owned you, but simply I find them to be blind cowards afraid of anything different, and always hiding behind a curtain of supernatural beliefs. :aok
-
I hereby declare condition code RED!
(http://fear.tjp.hu/fearcharts/4_300.png)
-
Stop feeding it then LOL!
they can't, they're like ...(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa223/Skyrock67/sheep.jpg) :aok
-
Freudian slip?
(chewing ice more common in the south :aok)
but riding on ice is more common in Minnesota! :aok
-
That would be fine if he didn't claim he was engaging in debate.
find a post i've made in this thread that implied I was debating. You can't, but I did manage to find a pic of you......(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa223/Skyrock67/moron.jpg) :aok
-
but riding on ice is more common in Minnesota! :aok
And you implied I was one (the iceberg)...that makes me the ridee where as you would be the chewer.....try again trollboi.
-
And you implied I was one (the iceberg)...that makes me the ridee where as you would be the chewer.....try again trollboi.
well, you got me, except I was talking about minnesota gay men like to ride on ice. :devil
-
(edited: nothing to see here)
-
find a post i've made in this thread that implied I was debating.
Ok, here you go! I'm holding you accountable... lol
Political debating, I might not disagree with you... blah blah
Oh and...
...to get the debate going.
By the way...
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa223/Skyrock67/blah.jpg)I own you here
The only thing you own is a...
(http://www.potloads.com/uploaded_images/cut%20out%20sack.jpg)
of
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/Feces_de_can_(dog).jpg/800px-Feces_de_can_(dog).jpg)
-
(edited: nothing to see here)
fahrenheit. :aok
:cool:
-
Ok, here you go! I'm holding you accountable... lol
:rofl
WRONG!
Not once have I said I was debating in this thread.
I do however seem to find watching debates most rewarding. :aok I hope that my trolling might produce some debates, but u guys outnumber the opposition so badly in here, noone with any amount of vigor for debating would put up with it. :aok
-
Not once have I said I was debating in this thread.
Did I not quote you?
(http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g211/ny2ks/liar2.jpg)
-
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay IN
and out...
-
Did I not quote you?
(http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g211/ny2ks/liar2.jpg)
here let me help you,
"political debating, I might not disagree with you, but no moron here bud"
"Things I post in here are to get the debate going. :aok"
The only two posts that I've even mentioned debating and neither imply that I myself am debating, rather that I like to get one going between the sides, the only problem, is there are only 4 or 5 lefties in the O'club, as opposed to hundreds of righties. :rofl
-
here let me help you,
"political debating, I might not disagree with you, but no moron here bud"
"Things I post in here are to get the debate going. :aok"
The only two posts that I've even mentioned debating and neither imply that I myself am debating, rather that I like to get one going between the sides...
Nothing here but a...
(http://www.coprorecords.co.uk/Images/Cop-out-Logo-Big.jpg)
-
Nothing here but a...
(http://www.coprorecords.co.uk/Images/Cop-out-Logo-Big.jpg)
:rofl
I guess you just don't have anything to truly dispute me not debating in this thread. :aok
Jaged, I own you, on here, in game, and in RL as well! :aok
-
Palin hates Natives so much that she married one...
Word....
-
I guess you just don't have anything to truly dispute me not debating in this thread. :aok
Jaged, I own you, on here, in game, and in RL as well! :aok
You want me to debate you on the fact that you don't debate? :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
(http://images.art.com/images/-/Happy-Bunny-Poster-C10077520.jpeg)(http://images.art.com/images/-/Happy-Bunny--C10086317.jpeg)
-
:rofl
WRONG!
Not once have I said I was debating in this thread.
I do however seem to find watching debates most rewarding. :aok I hope that my trolling might produce some debates, but u guys outnumber the opposition so badly in here, noone with any amount of vigor for debating would put up with it. :aok
5- Flamebaiting, trolling, or posting to incite or annoy is not allowed.
Maybe a quick review of the board rules is in order. :aok
-
5- Flamebaiting, trolling, or posting to incite or annoy is not allowed.
Maybe a quick review of the board rules is in order. :aok
posting to incite a debate? Don't see that rule in there anywhere. If I were posting crap you guys agreed with, would it be trolling? :rofl
-
5- Flamebaiting, trolling, or posting to incite or annoy is not allowed.
Maybe a quick review of the board rules is in order. :aok
WTG Elfie! Skyjock just got...
(http://www.mathewingram.com/work/wp-content/uploads/myspace-owned.jpg)
-
posting to incite a debate? Don't see that rule in there anywhere. If I were posting crap you guys agreed with, would it be trolling? :rofl
You admitted to trolling, which is a direct violation of rule #5. :uhoh
-
You admitted to trolling, which is a direct violation of rule #5. :uhoh
lolz, do I worry you that much? Do I make you read my threads and make multiple posts in each one? Because you sure are acting wimpy. If in fact I have broken a rule then, the moderator will handle it.
I mean, you just broke rule #6, but I can't tell you or I'd be breaking it. :rolleyes:
-
lolz, do I worry you that much? Do I make you read my threads and make multiple posts in each one? Because you sure are acting wimpy. If in fact I have broken a rule then, the moderator will handle it.
I mean, you just broke rule #6, but I can't tell you or I'd be breaking it. :rolleyes:
I'm acting wimpy for pointing out your blatant trolling and the rule you should maybe learn to live by? :)
-
I'm acting wimpy for pointing out your blatant trolling and the rule you should maybe learn to live by? :)
im not trolling, maybe trolling for some info, I would like to hear what people have to say, though. :aok
-
im not trolling, maybe trolling for some info, I would like to hear what people have to say, though. :aok
(http://www.nataliedee.com/062308/look-at-me-im-ruining-the-joke-guys.jpg)
-
(edited: nothing to see here)
:lol