Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: jolly22 on November 14, 2008, 04:57:43 AM

Title: omg!!!!
Post by: jolly22 on November 14, 2008, 04:57:43 AM
all ah has to do is add the b 29, a26, and the beufighter and this wishlist will have a lot less people
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: BaDkaRmA158Th on November 14, 2008, 06:10:39 AM
Thank you for the statement capt skippy, but that is not a wish.


try something like.. "I wish hTC would add these airplanes because they are highly wanted by the community, and such."


 :D
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: bongaroo on November 14, 2008, 08:19:48 AM
Beaufighter, yes!

b-29 a-26?  NO!  I'm still very confused about why we need either of these?  We should only get the b-29 if we get the Ki-100 or whatever it was and HTC enables collisions, because thats the only way we'll kill a b-29 at alt.

so in other words...Just say no to more american bombers!
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Kazaa on November 14, 2008, 08:25:06 AM
B-29 is needed just as much as any other aircraft when it comes to the late war plane set.  :aok
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Anaxogoras on November 14, 2008, 09:44:18 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c62/Masherbrum/nookie.gif)
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Denholm on November 14, 2008, 10:52:20 AM
I was too late. :(
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 14, 2008, 01:59:46 PM
Beaufighter, yes!

b-29 a-26?  NO!  I'm still very confused about why we need either of these?  We should only get the b-29 if we get the Ki-100 or whatever it was and HTC enables collisions, because thats the only way we'll kill a b-29 at alt.

so in other words...Just say no to more american bombers!
Agreed.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: VansCrew1 on November 14, 2008, 03:03:22 PM
all ah has to do is add the b 29, a26, and the beufighter and this wishlist will have a lot less people


Beaufighter-Yes
B29- Hell no
A26- After HTC adds a lot more planes like the HE-111 or the ME410 for example. And cant forget all the Russian planes that would be good to the game. As well as more japanese bombers and fighters. Maybe a few more British fighters. Oh yes and GV's.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 14, 2008, 03:04:51 PM

Beaufighter-Yes
B29- Hell no
A26- After HTC adds a lot more planes like the HE-111 or the ME410 for example. And cant forget all the Russian planes that would be good to the game. As well as more japanese bombers and fighters. Maybe a few more British fighters. Oh yes and GV's.
Don't forget about the G.55.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Bronk on November 14, 2008, 03:07:17 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c62/Masherbrum/nookie.gif)
LOL addictive isn't it?
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: VansCrew1 on November 14, 2008, 04:01:24 PM
Don't forget about the G.55.

Forgot about that one.  :aok
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 14, 2008, 04:02:40 PM
Forgot about that one.  :aok
Your welcome.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: weazely on November 14, 2008, 04:23:26 PM
You just killed a baby.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: NEARY on November 15, 2008, 05:00:35 PM
all ah has to do is add the b 29, a26, and the beufighter and this wishlist will have a lot less people

beufighter-YES
a-26-YES
b-29-much later,and never,ever with nook
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 15, 2008, 05:01:40 PM
beufighter-YES
a-26-YES
b-29-much later,and never,ever with nook
B-29 be the last to add?
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Tr1gg22 on November 15, 2008, 06:10:14 PM
like we really need more buffs  :noid
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: 1pLUs44 on November 15, 2008, 06:35:28 PM
Beaufighter, yes!

b-29 a-26?  NO!  I'm still very confused about why we need either of these?  We should only get the b-29 if we get the Ki-100 or whatever it was and HTC enables collisions, because thats the only way we'll kill a b-29 at alt.

so in other words...Just say no to more american bombers!

Bongaroo, the B-29 would probably be a waste in the MA, as slow as the dang thing climbs, and as big as it is. Think of it like this:

In WW2, the B-29 was made to go up to like 35K, where no fighter could touch it... no one in AHII will go up that high, at most, they'll go to like 10, maybe 15K. When they get up there, it's really just a big target to whoever can go up there and catch it. IIRC, they caught fire pretty easily, so it would probably be like a huge B-24
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Selino631 on November 15, 2008, 08:33:45 PM
(http://i510.photobucket.com/albums/s346/Selino30/G55.jpg)
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 15, 2008, 08:34:26 PM
(http://i510.photobucket.com/albums/s346/Selino30/G55.jpg)
It so sexy to.  :aok
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: A.F. Crash, Fire, Rescue on November 16, 2008, 03:29:46 AM
Bongaroo, the B-29 would probably be a waste in the MA, as slow as the dang thing climbs, and as big as it is. Think of it like this:

In WW2, the B-29 was made to go up to like 35K, where no fighter could touch it... no one in AHII will go up that high, at most, they'll go to like 10, maybe 15K. When they get up there, it's really just a big target to whoever can go up there and catch it. IIRC, they caught fire pretty easily, so it would probably be like a huge B-24

I would be the one that would take the time to climb to 20K+ in that uber bomber cause I've already done it in a B-17 and a B-24 before. Although it took some time I eventually got there and then completed my bombing run which also helped out with a mission that I didn't even know was inbound until I mademy descent to land at the nearest base due to the lack of fuel that I had. But I would use for a long distance HQ run if I got really bored.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: macerxgp on November 16, 2008, 10:27:50 PM
I've seen plenty of fighters at 30K. Most of them, however, are mission-based fighter sweeps and HQ raids. (Not to mention the random fighter jockey who pointed a Ta-152 skyward to see how far it'd go.) But, this may also add an entire new element to fighter missions. See, skilled mission planners may recognize the small/med darbar deep inside enemy territory as a climbing B-29 formation (side note- it may be a good idea to add a darbar multiplier to B-29's to balance them out a bit) and quickly organize a high-altitude interceptor mission. With a large interceptor mission likely to take off as soon as the B-29's broke the dar floor, long range fighter escort would be necessary. Personally, I believe that this could potentially introduce a whole new dimension to gameplay.


However, I also believe that the B-29 is last on the list of things we need. Even though this could be good for the game, I'd rather see the Ohka put in before the B-29. (Mostly because putting in the Ohka would establish the framework for introducing landing transports with vehicles, but it's still an all-around bad idea.) Also, the B-29 would need a heavy perk price to prevent it being abused, but that goes without saying.



Also, WE WILL NEVER PUT NUKES IN IT. PERIOD.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 16, 2008, 10:31:15 PM
I've seen plenty of fighters at 30K. Most of them, however, are mission-based fighter sweeps and HQ raids. (Not to mention the random fighter jockey who pointed a Ta-152 skyward to see how far it'd go.) But, this may also add an entire new element to fighter missions. See, skilled mission planners may recognize the small/med darbar deep inside enemy territory as a climbing B-29 formation (side note- it may be a good idea to add a darbar multiplier to B-29's to balance them out a bit) and quickly organize a high-altitude interceptor mission. With a large interceptor mission likely to take off as soon as the B-29's broke the dar floor, long range fighter escort would be necessary. Personally, I believe that this could potentially introduce a whole new dimension to gameplay.


However, I also believe that the B-29 is last on the list of things we need. Even though this could be good for the game, I'd rather see the Ohka put in before the B-29. (Mostly because putting in the Ohka would establish the framework for introducing landing transports with vehicles, but it's still an all-around bad idea.) Also, the B-29 would need a heavy perk price to prevent it being abused, but that goes without saying.



Also, WE WILL NEVER PUT NUKES IN IT. PERIOD.
(http://www.simonawhite.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/images/MXY7%20Ohka.jpg)Talking about the Ohka but we don't even have the Betty to carry it and who going to fly the slow Betty loaded with fuel with very  slow to a base and launch if off. Good luck with that. :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: macerxgp on November 17, 2008, 04:45:05 PM
That's another good thing about the Ohka. It means we GET the Betty!  :rofl
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 17, 2008, 05:03:10 PM
That's another good thing about the Ohka. It means we GET the Betty!  :rofl
It a flying gas tank.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Masherbrum on November 17, 2008, 05:25:26 PM
It a flying gas tank.

Amazing that so are the other planes too, isn't it?   
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 17, 2008, 05:26:43 PM
Amazing that so are the other planes too, isn't it?   
I know right like OMG GET OUT.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Masherbrum on November 17, 2008, 05:29:28 PM
I know right like OMG GET OUT.

The Community wishes you would.   
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 17, 2008, 05:31:32 PM
The Community wishes you would.   
Who doesn't but i do i care no do you yes and i don't. No B-29 seaplanes love to see them added along with the G.55.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Becinhu on November 17, 2008, 05:45:59 PM
Who doesn't but i do i care no do you yes and i don't. No B-29 seaplanes love to see them added along with the G.55.

 :huh :uhoh :(
You received top grades in grammar I see.
 :noid
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 17, 2008, 05:47:08 PM
:huh :uhoh :(
You received top grades in grammar I see.
 :noid
:aok
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: Ack-Ack on November 17, 2008, 07:19:34 PM
It a flying gas tank.

And what's your point?  We all know that the Betty, along with other Japanese planes were prone to catching fire.  So what is it that you're trying to bring to the table except the obvious?  Do you know anything about the Betty or the Baka bomb?  Anything that would contribute to this discussion?


ack-ack
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: macerxgp on November 18, 2008, 05:12:58 PM
In order to properly balance the use of the Ohka, it would require two Betty variants to be introduced. (That is if we limit the Ohka to the Betty. There were other aircraft that could carry them.) One as a pure bomber, and one with a hefty perk price, simply for the incredible bomb (rocket? :lol) load it carries. If the Ohka carrier was left unperked, we'd see widespread abuse of the Ohka. Not only in base raids, but especially in what it was made for; CV killing. Also, the slow speed of the bombers is more than made up for by the fact that the Ohka would be the SECOND rocket plane in our list. (Even though it only approaches 163-like speeds in a dive at full throttle. It's short burn range (23miles) is also more than made up for by the fact that 25 miles is equal to a whole sector, if I can recall.
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 18, 2008, 05:15:01 PM
In order to properly balance the use of the Ohka, it would require two Betty variants to be introduced. (That is if we limit the Ohka to the Betty. There were other aircraft that could carry them.) One as a pure bomber, and one with a hefty perk price, simply for the incredible bomb (rocket? :lol) load it carries. If the Ohka carrier was left unperked, we'd see widespread abuse of the Ohka. Not only in base raids, but especially in what it was made for; CV killing. Also, the slow speed of the bombers is more than made up for by the fact that the Ohka would be the SECOND rocket plane in our list. (Even though it only approaches 163-like speeds in a dive at full throttle. It's short burn range (23miles) is also more than made up for by the fact that 25 miles is equal to a whole sector, if I can recall.
But weren't they use in the last week of the war or is that the He-162?
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: JETBLST on November 18, 2008, 05:39:22 PM
Well how about a Late Late Arena?

There you can have a B29.  A nuke.  An Island.  An airfield with a spawn to 30k about 5 minutes outside of island.  When B29rs get over island they can look down and see a big X that says place nuke here for nuke fun!

Then as B29r turns for home they can get their mushroom cloud they so desperately crave!!

 :rofl

The B29rs can climb out and drop the nuke on the island as many times as they need until they get it out of their system?
Title: Re: omg!!!!
Post by: glock89 on November 18, 2008, 11:20:06 PM
Well how about a Late Late Arena?

There you can have a B29.  A nuke.  An Island.  An airfield with a spawn to 30k about 5 minutes outside of island.  When B29rs get over island they can look down and see a big X that says place nuke here for nuke fun!

Then as B29r turns for home they can get their mushroom cloud they so desperately crave!!

 :rofl

The B29rs can climb out and drop the nuke on the island as many times as they need until they get it out of their system?
What can go wrong.