Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Serenity on March 13, 2009, 03:59:44 AM

Title: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Serenity on March 13, 2009, 03:59:44 AM
See Rule #14
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Lusche on March 13, 2009, 04:09:06 AM
I don't dare to comment - Skuzzy is my god and his commandment # 14 is sacred to me  :pray
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: avionix on March 13, 2009, 08:02:31 AM
See Rule #14
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Dragon on March 13, 2009, 08:51:41 AM
Several of our Wednesday night study sessions became heated arguments regarding the free will - predestination thing.  It can be quite confusing on how a person can be predetermined and yet have the ability to choose.
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Reschke on March 13, 2009, 09:03:42 AM
See Rule #14
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Anaxogoras on March 13, 2009, 10:11:58 AM
God is an evil demon toying with us for his amusement. :devil
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: dentin on March 13, 2009, 10:28:09 AM
Quote
Posted by: Serenity
Insert Quote
conclusion:

Debating the nature of God is just as useless as discussing particle physics with an illiterate schizophrenic and twice as frustrating.

You've learned your lesson well Grasshopper.  :D

While "some" believe that  a God created us...it's my firm belief that when he was done with his "creativity kick " he conveniently forgot where he put us.  :cool:
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Nwbie on March 13, 2009, 10:29:11 AM
http://atheism.about.com/library/quotes/bl_q_CSagan.htm

Think this guy had a pretty good observation on the whole conversation

Carl Sagan

Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: dentin on March 13, 2009, 10:57:54 AM
http://atheism.about.com/library/quotes/bl_q_CSagan.htm

Think this guy had a pretty good observation on the whole conversation

Carl Sagan



Brilliant Mind...immeasurable loss to humanity.

Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: MORAY37 on March 13, 2009, 11:00:34 AM
 A celibate clergy is an especially good idea, because it tends to suppress any hereditary propensity toward fanaticism.
-Carl Sagan
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: NOT on March 13, 2009, 11:19:19 AM
A celibate clergy is an especially good idea, because it tends to suppress any hereditary propensity toward fanaticism.
-Carl Sagan
Brilliant Mind...immeasurable loss to humanity.


http://atheism.about.com/library/quotes/bl_q_CSagan.htm

Think this guy had a pretty good observation on the whole conversation

Carl Sagan



IMO if religious posts are no-no topics, then i think posts that argue against religion should also be no-nos. How can one who has faith in God respond to someone who does not when it is against the rules.




NOT
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: BigPlay on March 13, 2009, 11:38:06 AM
Several of our Wednesday night study sessions became heated arguments regarding the free will - predestination thing.  It can be quite confusing on how a person can be predetermined and yet have the ability to choose.


 That's because we have trouble understanding the time dimensional thing. The Bible says that God knew us before time began. So how difficult would it be that He knew who would choose him and who would not before we were born. We are instructed to spread the Gospel to the world not to try and convince people but to bring the saints (ones who would choose the Lord) into the light. Being predestined doesn't mean we were plucked out of a line up it means we are set aside, predetermined as you will to be part of God's plan . If you believe in the rapture then it isn't suppose to happen until the last person that will be saved is saved. Now if God doesn't know who will choose him and who won't how does he know who the last saved person will be.

I had someone ask me once after the tidal wave hit in the Pacific a number of years ago how God let some of those folks die unsaved when they may have become saved later in time. My answer was that those who died unsaved were never going to receive the Lord.

Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: druski85 on March 13, 2009, 11:50:15 AM
How in gods name is this thread still open?   

To get back to the original post...I couldn't agree more.  That being said, the post itself is a bit of a catch 22.  Clearly a response is wanted, or it wouldn't have been posted in the first place.  However if someone responds, it will inevitably be on the nature of god...which according to the OP is futile. 
/me looks for both the "this thread won't end well" and the "the internet is serious business" pictures...  :aok
   Also, what is that tugging at my lip?
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: dentin on March 13, 2009, 12:18:44 PM
IMO if religious posts are no-no topics, then i think posts that argue against religion should also be no-nos. How can one who has faith in God respond to someone who does not when it is against the rules.

I think the above question needs to be deposited into the "Mysteries of the Universe folder".   ;)





Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Dragon on March 13, 2009, 12:51:49 PM

 That's because we have trouble understanding the time dimensional thing. The Bible says that God knew us before time began. So how difficult would it be that He knew who would choose him and who would not before we were born. We are instructed to spread the Gospel to the world not to try and convince people but to bring the saints (ones who would choose the Lord) into the light. Being predestined doesn't mean we were plucked out of a line up it means we are set aside, predetermined as you will to be part of God's plan . If you believe in the rapture then it isn't suppose to happen until the last person that will be saved is saved. Now if God doesn't know who will choose him and who won't how does he know who the last saved person will be.



Well stated, but, their will be some who, after the rapture, become martyrs, and receive salvation. They will not be predestined, but saved none the less.   
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: BigPlay on March 13, 2009, 12:59:48 PM
http://atheism.about.com/library/quotes/bl_q_CSagan.htm

Think this guy had a pretty good observation on the whole conversation

Carl Sagan





Where's Darwins's proof? Or proof of the Big Bang? Or for that matter Carl Sagan's.
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: BigPlay on March 13, 2009, 01:37:06 PM
Well stated, but, their will be some who, after the rapture, become martyrs, and receive salvation. They will not be predestined, but saved none the less.   


True there will be people that survive the tribulation  by not receiving the mark. However as per the Bible they will be beheaded for their faith. There will also be those that escape to Prtra and those in places that live in areas that aren't subject to the persecution.
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: 68Hawk on March 13, 2009, 02:23:03 PM
What about the whole 'God is my co-pilot thing'?  If he's flying right seat then that means you're actually in control of the destiny of both of you, or rather that your free will is influencing the predetermination.  Kind of oxymoronic, but oh well.  I suppose with this metaphor you could say that you're flying on free will, but every once in a while predetermination steps in and makes the plane crash.  Did your co-pilot forget to fill up the fuel tanks?

I kind of like the bumper sticker:  "God was my co-pilot, but we crashed in the woods and I had to eat him."
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Dragon on March 13, 2009, 02:52:45 PM
What about the whole 'God is my co-pilot thing'?  If he's flying right seat then that means you're actually in control of the destiny of both of you, or rather that your free will is influencing the predetermination. 

If the pilot seat is on the right, as it is on several aircraft, and God is on the right, would that be like cruise control?
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: BigPlay on March 13, 2009, 03:38:02 PM
What about the whole 'God is my co-pilot thing'?  If he's flying right seat then that means you're actually in control of the destiny of both of you, or rather that your free will is influencing the predetermination.  Kind of oxymoronic, but oh well.  I suppose with this metaphor you could say that you're flying on free will, but every once in a while predetermination steps in and makes the plane crash.  Did your co-pilot forget to fill up the fuel tanks?

I kind of like the bumper sticker:  "God was my co-pilot, but we crashed in the woods and I had to eat him."


 I believe the term "God is my co-pilot" came from the book written by Flying Tiger pilot Robert Scott. Someone just made it into a bumper sticker.
Title: Re: Religious Observation (Possibly offensive)
Post by: Skuzzy on March 13, 2009, 03:52:35 PM
Everyone who contributed to this thread has been banned for one week.  There are consequences for deliberately violating the forum posting rules.