Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Guppy35 on October 09, 2009, 02:19:38 AM
-
Just sayin :)
-
Just sayin :)
QFT! :salute
-
SAPP has quite a few gifted skinners as well.
I'm sure we can coerce, err convince one of them to do the skinning for you. :devil
-
What's the difference performance wise of that vs. the 38G? I googled it, and found some information, but nothing regarding performance.
:salute
If it's better performance, I'm down.
-
What's the difference performance wise of that vs. the 38G? I googled it, and found some information, but nothing regarding performance.
:salute
If it's better performance, I'm down.
Surprised you have not jumped on your P63 wagon with the reasons the M was added.
-
Surprised you have not jumped on your P63 wagon with the reasons the M was added.
Don't get me wrong, I want the P-63, big time, but I'm happy with the Jug, and plus, HTC would have to remodel the P-39 to make it a P-63(New wing, and tail sections, not to mention 4 bladed prop, 58 rounds of 37 instead of the standard 30, and up the performance...etc) And I'm not saying don't add the 38H, just, how does it compare to the other 38s?
-
gives us the turdy8 H :D
-
I thought you'd be asking for the P-38F. :airplane:
-
There's no way HTC is going to give you guys the H model. You fly the other 38s too low, too slow and you always bring them back all messed up with stuff missing from them! One or two of these Pee turdy ate pile-its even have the balls to install a blender in the cockpit of their aircraft!
No sir there will be no more 38s added until you folks can take care of what you already have! :D
-
There's no way HTC is going to give you guys the H model. You fly the other 38s too low, too slow and you always bring them back all messed up with stuff missing from them! One or two of these Pee turdy ate pile-its even have the balls to install a blender in the cockpit of their aircraft!
No sir there will be no more 38s added until you folks can take care of what you already have! :D
You see? This is why we can't have nice things!
-
There's no way HTC is going to give you guys the H model. You fly the other 38s too low, too slow and you always bring them back all messed up with stuff missing from them! One or two of these Pee turdy ate pile-its even have the balls to install a blender in the cockpit of their aircraft!
No sir there will be no more 38s added until you folks can take care of what you already have! :D
:devil
-
They made the 47M perhaps they should stick with the M thing and
make the 38 with the probiscus!?
:bolt:
-
Can anybody put up some information on the H?
-
The H series P-38 had the same airframe as the earlier F and G models but had the Allison V-1710-F17 engines installed (same engine that later appeared in the J series). According to the chart I'm looking at it produced 1425 HP at sea level compared to 1325 that the G's engines put out. Weight went up a little bit as well but, but unless I'm missing something it would still be lighter than the P-38J with similar power output.
What prompted the change to the J was the leading edge wing intercoolers that were present on the early P-38's couldn't keep up with the increase in power from the newer engines which prompted the move to the deep chin you see under the props on the P-38J and L. The new space in the wing was converted to fuel cells which is also why the J and L have longer endurance than the G does in AH.
-
I hereby make two simultaneous petitions to HTC. :old:
1. Add the 38H
2. Remove it from the hangars of certain cartoon pile-its. The list of these pile-its is forthcoming but I will say that several of them have posted in this very thread. :bolt:
-
We've got enough allied bombers already, tyvm.
-
H as WEP too.
ack-ack
-
Just sayin :)
double that,,,,just sayin 2 :aok
-
yup must also be pretty easy to add a spit 12 guppy :D
-
I want the comet! :rock
-
This is the only Comet you are allowed to have:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Comet
-
Just sayin :)
Greedy sombiatch :D
-
Just sayin :)
ditto another easy add/fix oboe will provide the skin im sure :old:
-
There's no way HTC is going to give you guys the H model. You fly the other 38s too low, too slow and you always bring them back all messed up with stuff missing from them! One or two of these Pee turdy ate pile-its even have the balls to install a blender in the cockpit of their aircraft!
No sir there will be no more 38s added until you folks can take care of what you already have!
LOL Good one. :)
-
The H series P-38 had the same airframe as the earlier F and G models but had the Allison V-1710-F17 engines installed (same engine that later appeared in the J series). According to the chart I'm looking at it produced 1425 HP at sea level compared to 1325 that the G's engines put out. Weight went up a little bit as well but, but unless I'm missing something it would still be lighter than the P-38J with similar power output.
What prompted the change to the J was the leading edge wing intercoolers that were present on the early P-38's couldn't keep up with the increase in power from the newer engines which prompted the move to the deep chin you see under the props on the P-38J and L. The new space in the wing was converted to fuel cells which is also why the J and L have longer endurance than the G does in AH.
it almost sounds like a hot rodded g. i'd be all for that!! :airplane: :bolt:
-
Looks like the P-51C and P-51K would be an easy adds too! :bolt:
-
Looks like the P-51C and P-51K would be an easy adds too! :bolt:
I do believe you are correct ! :rock
-
They made the 47M perhaps they should stick with the M thing and
make the 38 with the probiscus!?
:bolt:
Why? No night time in MA
-
I personally would love to see the KI43, early war is very thin for the Japanese.
-
well since nobody went down this road yet i will :devil
after the 38H, 51c and K, P63 ect, i suggest we add the Spit 18, ive forgotten most of the specs except 4x .50's and 4x 20mm's.
throw in the b29, put hurricanes, mossies and b25's off the carrier, and we'll have a grand old time
:salute
-
Guppy it dont see how it is that much different if you fly a G...its gonna end up smashed in the ground somewhere.
-
Guppy it dont see how it is that much different if you fly a G...its gonna end up smashed in the ground somewhere.
:rofl
-
after the 38H, 51c and K, P63 ect, i suggest we add the Spit 18, ive forgotten most of the specs except 4x .50's and 4x 20mm's.
No, it had either 4x20mm OR the usual 2x20 + 2x .50 cal
And it did not see service in WWII.
-
well since nobody went down this road yet i will :devil
after the 38H, 51c and K, P63 ect, i suggest we add the Spit 18, ive forgotten most of the specs except 4x .50's and 4x 20mm's.
throw in the b29, put hurricanes, mossies and b25's off the carrier, and we'll have a grand old time
:salute
Spit 18 was a postwar bird and almost identical to the low back XIV.
But this is the 38H thread anyway! :)
The point was, the 47M was easily done as an existing model existed already so it was basically tweaking the numbers on it to get it to the 47M. Figured it would be as easy to do with the other early model 38s, with the H being first! :aok
-
And you, Allen, can now replace my wife's cat
-
P-38H. would this be the....ummmm..... last model of the P-38 before the war ended?
-
The consortium stands behind this wish.
-
P-38H. would this be the....ummmm..... last model of the P-38 before the war ended?
The H series P-38 had the same airframe as the earlier F and G models but had the Allison V-1710-F17 engines installed (same engine that later appeared in the J series). According to the chart I'm looking at it produced 1425 HP at sea level compared to 1325 that the G's engines put out. Weight went up a little bit as well but, but unless I'm missing something it would still be lighter than the P-38J with similar power output.
What prompted the change to the J was the leading edge wing intercoolers that were present on the early P-38's couldn't keep up with the increase in power from the newer engines which prompted the move to the deep chin you see under the props on the P-38J and L. The new space in the wing was converted to fuel cells which is also why the J and L have longer endurance than the G does in AH.
-
The H series P-38 had the same airframe as the earlier F and G models but had the Allison V-1710-F17 engines installed (same engine that later appeared in the J series). According to the chart I'm looking at it produced 1425 HP at sea level compared to 1325 that the G's engines put out. Weight went up a little bit as well but, but unless I'm missing something it would still be lighter than the P-38J with similar power output.
What prompted the change to the J was the leading edge wing inter coolers that were present on the early P-38's couldn't keep up with the increase in power from the newer engines which prompted the move to the deep chin you see under the props on the P-38J and L. The new space in the wing was converted to fuel cells which is also why the J and L have longer endurance than the G does in AH.
Updated 1,425hp (1063-kW) V-1710-89/-91 engines powered the 375 P38-Hs, which also introduced automatic oil radiator flaps to solve a major engine overheating problem. In other respects the P-38H was essentially identical to the P-38G-10-LO, though it had B33 intsead of B-13 turbochargers.
-
AS for all the Parts that the 38 pilots are leaving all over the Arenas, call Red Bull they will buy any warbird parts, and restore them......
-
Don't get me wrong, I want the P-63, big time, but I'm happy with the Jug, and plus, HTC would have to remodel the P-39 to make it a P-63(New wing, and tail sections, not to mention 4 bladed prop, 58 rounds of 37 instead of the standard 30, and up the performance...etc) And I'm not saying don't add the 38H, just, how does it compare to the other 38s?
Yikes big sentence. :headscratch: :neener:
-
AS for all the Parts that the 38 pilots are leaving all over the Arenas, call Red Bull they will buy any warbird parts, and restore them......
i'll make em spend so much money, they;ll go broke
-
:banana:
-
HTC needs to put out another Axis plane, the allies have plenty on the list as it is.
Ki-43
Ki-44
Ki-100
J2M
More 190 & 109 variants
-
Ki-27a with 2x 7.7mm & as a variant, the Ki-27b with 1x 7.7mm + 12.7mm & bombs
Ki-43-Ic with 2x 12.7mm & as a variant, the Ki-43-IIa
As for the OP's original question: I don't see why not. Just gotta get pyro & a skinner to agree (I heard 25yo single-malt scotch works wonders for these requests)
-
I thought you'd be asking for the P-38F. :airplane:
Makes sense since it came along first =)
-
Ki-27a with 2x 7.7mm & as a variant, the Ki-27b with 1x 7.7mm + 12.7mm & bombs
Ki-43-Ic with 2x 12.7mm & as a variant, the Ki-43-IIa
As for the OP's original question: I don't see why not. Just gotta get pyro & a skinner to agree (I heard 25yo single-malt scotch works wonders for these requests)
Check out a post I made in the Wishlist on the Zeros. You could conceivably have SIX different Ki-43 variants just with 2 models and gun packages.
-
HTC needs to put out another Axis plane, the allies have plenty on the list as it is.
Ki-43
Ki-44
Ki-100
J2M
More 190 & 109 variants
Ya know for the 6th post he has made since 2005, that is a pretty darn good post. :aok
-
While we are working the wish lists, here are a few early war birds I’d like to see:
Fokker D.XXI
Reggiane Re.2002
Fiat G.50
Dewoitine D.520
Morane-Saulnier M.S. 406
Nakajima Ki-43
Nakajima Ki-27
Yes, EW birds are hangar queens. Probably not worth the time to model when weighed against the amount of flight time these would get outside scenarios.
An interesting footnote is how many of the above were flown by the Finnish AF:
Fokker D.XXI
Fiat G.50
Morane-Saulnier M.S. 406
How did those guys get parts?
More in line with the OP, here are a few variants I’d like to see:
Ju-87G (?) with the big anti tank cannons
F2A (Brewster 139)
A-26
-
Technically we already have the F2A, via a gun package option on the B-239. (3x.50cal + 1 .30cal). There's a VMF-221 skin coming out for it.
-
OK, so the P-38H looks like a P-38G and performs like a P-38J?
It needs to be added why? Fly the G for looks or the J for its performance.?
wrongway
-
I want both :banana:
-
I want both :banana:
Well wooopteedoo....
(http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t104/megncali/OH-dot-com/banana.gif)
-
Bring
(http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/6742/38hporkyiib.png)
to AH!