Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Traveler on February 16, 2010, 05:49:25 PM
-
I wish that the armament options available for the P38L included all the available options that were flown at the time in the P38L.
From the Specifications (P38L)
Armanment
M2 Machine Gun in the nose of the P38
1 x Hispano M2(C) 20 MM Cannon with 150 rounds
4 x 50 caliber machine
Inner Hardpoints
4 x M10 three-tube 4.5 in rocket launcher or
2x 2000 Lb bombs or drop tanks or 2 x 1000 lb bombs or drop tanks, Plue either
4 x 500lb bombs or 4 x 250lb bombs or 6 x 500lb or 6x 250 lb bombs on the outer hardpoints
Outer Hardpoints
10 x 5 in HVARs or 2 x 500lb or 2 x 250 lb
-
Due to the limitations of the current ordnance system, I don't think the all the ordnance packages the P-38 was capable of using is possible. However, Pyro did mention that a perked ordnance system was in the planning stages or under development that would allow for different ordnance packages that currently can't be used. For example, with a perked ordnance system it would be possible for the B-25H to carry HVAR rockets or AP rounds for the 75mm cannon.
ack-ack
-
Due to the limitations of the current ordnance system
ack-ack
What limitation is that? I wasn't aware that there was an ordnance system limition. Or do you just mean that all the historical ordnance packages were never programmed in so that it would require a coding change? if that's what you mean, I thought that's what the Wish forum was all about.
-
Traveler,
There was a 16 hardpoint limit,it has since been quadrupled to 64 I believe.
As it is there been a small glitch with the 38L as it exceeded the 16 point limit already.
Once the change is implemented I'm sure we'll see many differences ingame.
If you look back at the update announcements you'll see it all explained by much more knowledgable people than I.
:salute
-
Also, AH seems to frown on field-modified weapons setups. The 4-bomb-hardpoints setup is a field-rigged thing. From the factory they only have the 2 bomb pylons, so maybe (?) HTC is just modeling that.
P.S. But a pair of 2k eggs would reinvent suicide dive-bombing in this game, hehehe. With rockets and your 20mm you could take out 2 hangars! I'd like to see that option (perhaps perked, as mentioned)
-
For example, with a perked ordnance system it would be possible for the B-25H to carry HVAR rockets or AP rounds for the 75mm cannon.
ack-ack
Or Tiny Tims! Or the centerline 2000lber or DT for the F4U-1D!
:D
-
Not to hi-jack, but I'd LOVE the center rack on corsairs... it's very much needed to mix bombs and DTs for the models without wing tank options.
-
Also, AH seems to frown on field-modified weapons setups. The 4-bomb-hardpoints setup is a field-rigged thing. From the factory they only have the 2 bomb pylons, so maybe (?) HTC is just modeling that.
P.S. But a pair of 2k eggs would reinvent suicide dive-bombing in this game, hehehe. With rockets and your 20mm you could take out 2 hangars! I'd like to see that option (perhaps perked, as mentioned)
The 2000lb bomb was not a field-rigged thing or the 4x 500 lb. Those were in the original factory specifications.
-
I don't mean the 2000lb bombs themselves, I mean the fact that folks in the field bolted external shackles onto the bottom of the wing to carry said bombs. Didn't come from the factory that way.
That's all I meant.
-
What limitation is that? I wasn't aware that there was an ordnance system limition. Or do you just mean that all the historical ordnance packages were never programmed in so that it would require a coding change? if that's what you mean, I thought that's what the Wish forum was all about.
Don't have time to search through the threads to find Pyro's post about it but the gist of it was that the current system couldn't take a ordnance package beyond a certain limit. Which is one of the reasons why we can't have bombs more than 4,000 pounds or load out such as HVARs on B-25Hs. From what I recall of Pyro's post, it would require a reworking of the ordnance system and that's when it was mentioned about a perked ordnance system. At the time, it appeared as though it was something that was either actively being discussed at HTC or actually in some stage of development. It's been at least a year or two since that post so I don't know what the status is. I hope it's something that didn't drop off due to lack of a high priority.
ack-ack
-
The 2000lb bomb was not a field-rigged thing or the 4x 500 lb. Those were in the original factory specifications.
The 2000 pounder was rarely carried. The pilots didn't much care for it and a 1000 pounder was more then enough bang for the buck. I'd like to see the 4 500 pounder rack system that wasn't a field mod too. Lots of photos of in the field mods, but I haven't seen any of a standard 4 rack set up on the 3L8
-
Don't have time to search through the threads to find Pyro's post about it but the gist of it was that the current system couldn't take a ordnance package beyond a certain limit. Which is one of the reasons why we can't have bombs more than 4,000 pounds or load out such as HVARs on B-25Hs. From what I recall of Pyro's post, it would require a reworking of the ordnance system and that's when it was mentioned about a perked ordnance system. At the time, it appeared as though it was something that was either actively being discussed at HTC or actually in some stage of development. It's been at least a year or two since that post so I don't know what the status is. I hope it's something that didn't drop off due to lack of a high priority.
ack-ack
I'll bet its part of combat toure.
-
Just in case you were being serious, they cancelled the "Combat Tour" part of game development. Moved on to general improvements and other gameplay development that didn't include AI-loaded historical missions.
We have many advancements in-game today thanks to that long development process, but overall they stopped it and moved on.
-
Just in case you were being serious, they cancelled the "Combat Tour" part of game development. Moved on to general improvements and other gameplay development that didn't include AI-loaded historical missions.
We have many advancements in-game today thanks to that long development process, but overall they stopped it and moved on.
I was being serious. And that's my point. I doubt that there is a change to the armanment system for perks in development right now. I have no way of actually knowing. Because HighTech Creations changes directions when they feel the need to, none of us customers really knows what the long range plan is. I know that they have a lot of screen shots of the WWI aircraft on the web page right now and I'm guessing that is where their priority is right now. Just like it was their priority with Combat tour. That's why I'm asking for the historical armanment packages to be added to the game now.
-
I was being serious. And that's my point. I doubt that there is a change to the armanment system for perks in development right now. I have no way of actually knowing. Because HighTech Creations changes directions when they feel the need to, none of us customers really knows what the long range plan is. I know that they have a lot of screen shots of the WWI aircraft on the web page right now and I'm guessing that is where their priority is right now. Just like it was their priority with Combat tour. That's why I'm asking for the historical armanment packages to be added to the game now.
Can you show me a photo of a Lockheed production 38 that came out of the factory with the 4 hardpoints for the 500 pounders?
I've only ever seen them on MTO 38L's that were modified in the field. The largest loadout carried in the ETO were 2000 pounders on a couple of occasions and they didn't use them more because of the special bracing needed and they were not more effective then the 1000 pounders they normally carried on the 9th AF 38s from October 44 til the end. I've never seen a PTO 38 carrying 4 bombs or with 4 hard points for them. They didn't carry the rocket trees much either. And I've never seen anything to show the rocket trees made it to the ETO, just some 49th FG P38Ls in mid 45 in the PTO.
I have all the 38 group histories available, and everything else written on the 38 that I can get my hands on and I've not seen 38L's, outside of the field modified birds in the MTO with the bomb loadout you talk about.
-
Can you show me a photo of a Lockheed production 38 that came out of the factory with the 4 hardpoints for the 500 pounders?
I've only ever seen them on MTO 38L's that were modified in the field. The largest loadout carried in the ETO were 2000 pounders on a couple of occasions and they didn't use them more because of the special bracing needed and they were not more effective then the 1000 pounders they normally carried on the 9th AF 38s from October 44 til the end. I've never seen a PTO 38 carrying 4 bombs or with 4 hard points for them. They didn't carry the rocket trees much either. And I've never seen anything to show the rocket trees made it to the ETO, just some 49th FG P38Ls in mid 45 in the PTO.
I have all the 38 group histories available, and everything else written on the 38 that I can get my hands on and I've not seen 38L's, outside of the field modified birds in the MTO with the bomb loadout you talk about.
I have never seen photos. What I saw was a set of documents titled “ Lockheed factory Specification P38L”. I also read about special brackets needed for the wooden 300 Gal. external fuel tanks but not for the 2000lb. The 300 gal fuel tanks were used to ferry the aircraft from the states to the UK via Greenland and Iceland.
-
I have never seen photos. What I saw was a set of documents titled “ Lockheed factory Specification P38L”. I also read about special brackets needed for the wooden 300 Gal. external fuel tanks but not for the 2000lb. The 300 gal fuel tanks were used to ferry the aircraft from the states to the UK via Greenland and Iceland.
OK. I'm guessing it was something they didn't follow through on then. The 2000 pounders had to have wooden bracing too. I talked to a 38 driver who dropped 2000 pounders and they didn't like them for the reasons mentioned. The wooden bracing was a pain too and they had to drop them just so to avoid damaging their own 38s. They dropped them twice. They commonly carried the 1000 pounders after October 44 and felt like the bang for the buck was about the same with them as it was with the 2000 pounders and it was safer and easier to use the 1000 pounders.
I think it comes down to what they could do in theory and what they did for real.
-
I think it comes down to what they could do in theory and what they did for real.
I think this would be a prime time to post how many bottles of liquor a P38 could carry.
*hint hint*
-
time to pull the 50s out of the tail of the lanc then?
:t
-
time to pull the 50s out of the tail of the lanc then?
:t
Why? The turret with the .50s was a standard, factory turret. Yes, most Lanc's had four .303s, but the .50s were not that uncommon.
-
I think this would be a prime time to post how many bottles of liquor a P38 could carry.
*hint hint*
Leland Blair and "Horrible" Hagar of the 80th FS determined that you could get 58 bottles of scotch into a 38 to bring back to the squadron. Five different spaces were used. The space normally used for tech orders and operating manuals, the space for the 50 cal ammunition cans, the space for the 20mm cannon ammo, and the space for the ejected 20mm cannon ammo along with the radio and hydraulic spaces in the cockpit.
80th Headhunters were one of the most well lubricated squadron in the PTO as well as one of the most successful :)
-
There are WAYYYYY too many hijacks in here...............
But I am for all of them!
:aok +1
-
The 2000 pounder was rarely carried. The pilots didn't much care for it and a 1000 pounder was more then enough bang for the buck. I'd like to see the 4 500 pounder rack system that wasn't a field mod too. Lots of photos of in the field mods, but I haven't seen any of a standard 4 rack set up on the 3L8
Not many folks on here realize what the concussion is like, from a 500lb or even a 250lb bomb. Let alone a 1k or 2k. Excellent reply Dan.
-
Leland Blair and "Horrible" Hagar of the 80th FS determined that you could get 58 bottles of scotch into a 38 to bring back to the squadron. Five different spaces were used. The space normally used for tech orders and operating manuals, the space for the 50 cal ammunition cans, the space for the 20mm cannon ammo, and the space for the ejected 20mm cannon ammo along with the radio and hydraulic spaces in the cockpit.
80th Headhunters were one of the most well lubricated squadron in the PTO as well as one of the most successful :)
I can't recall the name of the pilot off hand but in his biography of his war time experiences as a young Spitfire pilot during the BoB and later fighting over Malta, he found out that you could carry enough cigarretes in a Spitfire V for his entire squadron. This was discovered when he was about to launch off a CV off of Malta when he noticed his ground crew had removed all the ammo and replaced them with cigarettes. He also mentioned that when they launched, they were starting to be under attack from the Germans and if he got bounced, he was SOL since his ammo was replaced by the cigarettes.
ack-ack
-
I can't recall the name of the pilot off hand but in his biography of his war time experiences as a young Spitfire pilot during the BoB and later fighting over Malta, he found out that you could carry enough cigarretes in a Spitfire V for his entire squadron. This was discovered when he was about to launch off a CV off of Malta when he noticed his ground crew had removed all the ammo and replaced them with cigarettes. He also mentioned that when they launched, they were starting to be under attack from the Germans and if he got bounced, he was SOL since his ammo was replaced by the cigarettes.
ack-ack
One of the Spit XII pilots I knew mentioned that a Belgian pilot from 41 squadron used those same spaces to load soap, TP etc for his family when the squadron moved to the continent.
-
Leland Blair and "Horrible" Hagar of the 80th FS determined that you could get 58 bottles of scotch into a 38 to bring back to the squadron. Five different spaces were used. The space normally used for tech orders and operating manuals, the space for the 50 cal ammunition cans, the space for the 20mm cannon ammo, and the space for the ejected 20mm cannon ammo along with the radio and hydraulic spaces in the cockpit.
80th Headhunters were one of the most well lubricated squadron in the PTO as well as one of the most successful :)
I can't recall the name of the pilot off hand but in his biography of his war time experiences as a young Spitfire pilot during the BoB and later fighting over Malta, he found out that you could carry enough cigarretes in a Spitfire V for his entire squadron. This was discovered when he was about to launch off a CV off of Malta when he noticed his ground crew had removed all the ammo and replaced them with cigarettes. He also mentioned that when they launched, they were starting to be under attack from the Germans and if he got bounced, he was SOL since his ammo was replaced by the cigarettes.
ack-ack
One of the Spit XII pilots I knew mentioned that a Belgian pilot from 41 squadron used those same spaces to load soap, TP etc for his family when the squadron moved to the continent.
:rofl :rofl Absolutely hilarious.
-
One of the Spit XII pilots I knew mentioned that a Belgian pilot from 41 squadron used those same spaces to load soap, TP etc for his family when the squadron moved to the continent.
Finally got home and managed to find the book I was talking about. First Light: The True Story of the Boy Who Became a Man in the War-Torn Skies above Britain, by George Wellum. I guess the main reasons they removed the ammo and loaded up cigarettes instead was to save weight and to raise morale on Malta since they were under constant attack and were almost out of smokes on the island.
ack-ack
-
Ack-Ack, how were the HARV's carried on the B-25? In the bombay or something?
-
Ok My Mk XII alarm went off.... who hit it?