Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: cp101 on February 24, 2010, 07:13:46 PM
-
an ohka will be a good idea, it can be launched from the betty bombers and the engine can be ignited by the turn on engine button it can be counted as attacker or bomber and the bombers can return automaticly
-
Big negative on that one chief.
-
That sounds like it would hurt my score!
-
:rofl
an ohka will be a good idea, it can be launched from the Bomber we DO NOT have and the engine can be ignited by the turn on engine button it can be counted as attacker or bomber and the bombers can return automaticly
No, I think it would be counted as a bomb. Or are you really wishing for the Betty?
And let me get this straight....... It has a button..... To turn on the engine? NO WAY MAN!!!
-
an ohka will be a good idea, it can be launched from the betty bombers and the engine can be ignited by the turn on engine button it can be counted as attacker or bomber and the bombers can return automaticly
i dont have a touch screen so i cant press the button. :cry
-
epic (_____).... can everybody say it... epic... whats that word??? :rofl :rofl :rofl
-
suicide rockets/planes/bombers is not what AH is about imo. . . strapping yourself into a plane with the sole intention of ramming defeats the whole point of an air combat game.
plus, I don't think they were ever succesful in killing anything. I know the Kaiten (回天) was, but suicide subs is also a poor addition.
-
The thing only had like 3,000 pounds of ords.It would be cool but wouldn't it be perked because it's a jet and we would sacrifice perks just to Kamikaze in to a carrier.Long as it is perked 10-50 no higher it sounds cool.
-
The thing only had like 3,000 pounds of ords.It would be cool but wouldn't it be perked because it's a jet and we would sacrifice perks just to Kamikaze in to a carrier.Long as it is perked 10-50 no higher it sounds cool.
The thing is a manned bomb. Nothing more. It doesn;t have ords. It is ords.
wrongway
-
epic (_____).... can everybody say it... epic... whats that word??? :rofl :rofl :rofl
Win? :D
-
OH WOW..............
The thing only had like 3,000 pounds of ords.It would be cool but wouldn't it be perked because it's a jet and we would sacrifice perks just to Kamikaze in to a carrier.Long as it is perked 10-50 no higher it sounds cool.
-
What the hell is it with people wanting to get points for crashing?
(http://www.lolblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/doublefacepalm.jpg)
-
NOPE. Don't make me drag out the big "nope"... :rolleyes:
-
suicide rockets/planes/bombers is not what AH is about imo. . . strapping yourself into a plane with the sole intention of ramming defeats the whole point of an air combat game.
Wait a minute...I thought strapping on an aircraft with the sole intention of ramming WAS the point? What is this and what have the aliens done with AH? :headscratch:
-
NOPE. Don't make me drag out the big "nope"... :rolleyes:
Don't be such a tease!
-
. . . strapping yourself into a plane with the sole intention of ramming defeats the whole point of an air combat game...
...and yet so many people do it.
-
The thing only had like 3,000 pounds of ords.It would be cool but wouldn't it be perked because it's a jet and we would sacrifice perks just to Kamikaze in to a carrier.Long as it is perked 10-50 no higher it sounds cool.
Which model? Only 3,000 lbs of ordnance? The only type that saw action (if you can call it that; the Ohka didn't have any guns) was the type 11, which was powered by rocket motors, and had a 1,200 kg warhead, which translates to a little more than 2,400 lbs, which still is a lot of ordnance. Also, the idea of perking something because it is a jet is silly. The reason the jets are perked is because of the potential they have, not because they are powered by jet engines. Same reason why the Tempest, Tiger, and 4-Hog are perked.
-
It wouldn't mind the Ohka if it worked something like this:
Your friend picks the G4M2, no formations, in the hangar and selects the Ohka shackles as his load out. He then spawns on the runway and waits.
You pay X perks for the Ohka and select the same spawn point he just did, appearing shackled to the G4M2.
Your friend then carries you to the target. When desired he drops you and you begin your controlled glide in, firing your rocket motor when desired.
All perks are lost. The loss of the perk points symbolizing the loss of the pilot. The perk cost should be significant, in the range of the cost of a single Ar234.
-
an ohka will be a good idea, it can be launched from the betty bombers and the engine can be ignited by the turn on engine button it can be counted as attacker or bomber and the bombers can return automaticly
(http://www.sunlight.de/x-plane/images/screenshots/ohka_cockpit.jpg)
-
Only if you have to wait in the tower for 30 minutes until upping again
-
It wouldn't mind the Ohka if it worked something like this:
Your friend picks the G4M2, no formations, in the hangar and selects the Ohka shackles as his load out. He then spawns on the runway and waits.
You pay X perks for the Ohka and select the same spawn point he just did, appearing shackled to the G4M2.
Your friend then carries you to the target. When desired he drops you and you begin your controlled glide in, firing your rocket motor when desired.
All perks are lost. The loss of the perk points symbolizing the loss of the pilot. The perk cost should be significant, in the range of the cost of a single Ar234.
If the ohka WILL be perked IF we ever get it, it should be perked as a bomber or its own category. It cant be called a fighter, as it has no ords or any means of really killing another plane. It's job was to AT as a bomb, so ?it only makes sense to me that it is perked as an ord deliverer.
-
If the ohka WILL be perked IF we ever get it, it should be perked as a bomber or its own category. It cant be called a fighter, as it has no ords or any means of really killing another plane. It's job was to AT as a bomb, so ?it only makes sense to me that it is perked as an ord deliverer.
In my concept it would be using bomber perks, but not those of the G4M2 pilot. It would use the bomber perks of the player piloting the Ohka, and it would have to be pricey enough to discourage common usage, even knowing the perk price could not be refunded.
Of course it would also be attached to the slow, vulnerable G4M2 and if that got shot down, well, goodbye to your perks that way too.
-
In my concept it would be using bomber perks, but not those of the G4M2 pilot. It would use the bomber perks of the player piloting the Ohka, and it would have to be pricey enough to discourage common usage, even knowing the perk price could not be refunded.
Of course it would also be attached to the slow, vulnerable G4M2 and if that got shot down, well, goodbye to your perks that way too.
Yeah that's what I am saying, G4m2 pilot shouldn't have to pay any perks, but the Ohka pilot would.
-
OR! IF we get the betty and the Ohka (not going to happen) you could perk the ohka as ord and when you use it YOU go into the ohka with your bomber unpretected (unless some one else is your gunner) BANG it counts as a death on you, but if you killed anyone else that counts too. Then you get back in the pilots seat and have to land your bomber to keep your points. what do ya think? :devil
-
OR! IF we get the betty and the Ohka (not going to happen) you could perk the ohka as ord with bomber points (cuz you can't have bombers without boms.) and when you use it YOU go into the ohka from the pilots seat with your bomber unpretected (unless some one else is your gunner). BANG you hit, it counts as a death on you, but if you killed anyone else that counts too. Then you get back in the pilots seat and have to land your bomber to keep your points. what do ya think? It efects your kill to death ratio, your perk points, and could probably do some pretty good damage.
P.S. and don't act like you wouldn't be able to fly it anyone can fly any plane in the game i'm tired of people acting like that. *hits period key really hard*
-
No, I don't think the Ohka should ever be usable by one person. It should require two players, one to fly the Betty and one to fly the Ohka.
-
No, I don't think the Ohka should ever be usable by one person. It should require two players, one to fly the Betty and one to fly the Ohka.
And you lose ALL your perks. Fighter, bomber, and vehicle.
-
And you lose ALL your perks. Fighter, bomber, and vehicle.
No, that is overkill. Just a lot of bomber perks.
-
No, that is overkill. Just a lot of bomber perks.
A whole lot, if allowed at all. Still frowning on this... :frown:
-
No, that is overkill. Just a lot of bomber perks.
Considering the ridiculous ease with which a player can build up massive loads of bomber perks I think not. It could cost 500 and there's still guys out there that could run 4-5 suicide flights and still not run out of them.
-
Considering the ridiculous ease with which a player can build up massive loads of bomber perks I think not. It could cost 500 and there's still guys out there that could run 4-5 suicide flights and still not run out of them.
So? Most of them wouldn't.
I mean, think about it. How hard would it be compared to diving a Tiffy in at 500mph? That Betty flight part of it would suck and the payoff wouldn't be any better than the Tiffy would get.
I don't think any effort should be made to do this, I was just discussing a reasonable way of doing it. There are tens of thousands of things that have higher priority, at least.
-
- Infinite
As much as I would love to kamikaze into things its just not good sportsmanship.
BUT, if we do get the Betty. Scenario wise it would be FREAKING FUN
-
Ohka should be a 2 man crew 1 flying the bomber, and 1 to fly the ohka. All I want to know iz when can we have them.
-
an ohka will be a good idea, it can be launched from the betty bombers and the engine can be ignited by the turn on engine button it can be counted as attacker or bomber and the bombers can return automaticly
Oh boy...
(http://i1213.photobucket.com/albums/cc473/UnkShadow/TripleFacePalm.jpg)
-
Ohka should be a 2 man crew 1 flying the bomber, and 1 to fly the ohka. All I want to know iz when can we have them.
you resurrected a 2 year old thread and it has been mentioned before that there will not be any kamikaze planes. except for lanstuckas which are already part of the game.
semp
-
you resurrected a 2 year old thread and it has been mentioned before that there will not be any kamikaze planes. except for lanstuckas which are already part of the game.
semp
not to mention we don't have the plane necessary to launch the Baka Bomb.
ack-ack