Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Blooz on March 31, 2010, 05:42:24 PM

Title: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Blooz on March 31, 2010, 05:42:24 PM
OK. Since we're getting on late in the day I guess I'll try my hand at it.

Hope you like my pick for today.


Enjoy.


(http://www.africapresse.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/sexy-black_girl3.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: uptown on March 31, 2010, 05:46:51 PM
 :aok
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Closer on March 31, 2010, 06:07:57 PM

                  What was the matter with her real eyebrows ?
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: WWhiskey on March 31, 2010, 06:34:44 PM
                  What was the matter with her real eyebrows ?
LOL
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on March 31, 2010, 06:39:45 PM
She looks really, intensely fake: fake boobs, fake eyebrows, obvious plastic surgery.  He/she/it looks more like a freakin' barbie doll than a human being.

-Penguin
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Plawranc on March 31, 2010, 08:30:35 PM
(http://www.mosnews.com/photos/gallery/1500/1519_580x.jpg)

Yeah.....  :devil
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: mechanic on March 31, 2010, 08:48:42 PM
i think she looks good, not the best wednesday babe but not the worst either.  :aok
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Gaidin on March 31, 2010, 08:51:42 PM
Where is SWOOP when we need him!
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Motherland on March 31, 2010, 09:01:34 PM
(http://www.mosnews.com/photos/gallery/1500/1519_580x.jpg)

Yeah.....  :devil
Paper bag
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Gaidin on March 31, 2010, 09:06:49 PM
Paper bag

Agreed!
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: sluggish on March 31, 2010, 09:21:45 PM
Where is SWOOP when we need him!

Flippin Liverpool...  Nothing good has ever come from the place.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: RufusLeaking on March 31, 2010, 09:23:43 PM
OK. Since we're getting on late in the day I guess I'll try my hand at it.

Hope you like my pick for today.


Enjoy.


(http://www.africapresse.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/sexy-black_girl3.jpg)
An apple and a pair.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: SPKmes on March 31, 2010, 10:15:07 PM
Paper bag

make it two...just in case the first tears....

but I do remember my dad once told me something about...stoking a fire and a mantle..so she's all good.

Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: CAP1 on March 31, 2010, 10:22:33 PM
OK. Since we're getting on late in the day I guess I'll try my hand at it.

Hope you like my pick for today.


Enjoy.


(http://www.africapresse.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/sexy-black_girl3.jpg)

very nice.  :aok
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: 68ZooM on March 31, 2010, 10:28:08 PM
 OK Guess where i went to eat for Dinner, this is THE Wednesday babes have to have two to make up from them, ummmmmmmm other two up there  :old:


(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/hooters-girls-5413.jpg)  :eek: :x :eek:(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/CBJ-hooters.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: CAP1 on March 31, 2010, 10:42:07 PM
OK Guess where i went to eat for Dinner, this is THE Wednesday babes have to have two to make up from them, ummmmmmmm other two up there  :old:


(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/hooters-girls-5413.jpg)  :eek: :x :eek:(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/CBJ-hooters.jpg)

penguin will be along shortly to tell us all of the faults with these beautiful women....unlesssss.....there's another reason he had problems with the first beauty........... :noid :noid
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: DaCoon on March 31, 2010, 10:43:59 PM
OK Guess where i went to eat for Dinner, this is THE Wednesday babes have to have two to make up from them, ummmmmmmm other two up there  :old:


(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/hooters-girls-5413.jpg)  :eek: :x :eek:(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/CBJ-hooters.jpg)


 :aok :aok
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: VonMessa on March 31, 2010, 11:00:01 PM
Paper bag

I'd use a flag.........

and do it for my country  :aok
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Bruv119 on April 01, 2010, 05:07:21 AM
OK Guess where i went to eat for Dinner, this is THE Wednesday babes have to have two to make up from them, ummmmmmmm other two up there  :old:


(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/hooters-girls-5413.jpg)  :eek: :x :eek:(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/CBJ-hooters.jpg)

the one on the right looks like a blonde cheryl cole   :headscratch:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: uptown on April 01, 2010, 05:39:53 AM
(http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk121/TheAmish/jennifer_ellison_sexy_pose_1024x768.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: VonMessa on April 01, 2010, 06:32:23 AM
Her roots are showing  :O
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: uptown on April 01, 2010, 07:00:15 AM
 :lol i knew that was coming  :lol we need Swoop back soon.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Dragon on April 01, 2010, 07:18:01 AM
Eye candy.  They all taste good in their own way.


I wonder how many licks it would take......
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: CAP1 on April 01, 2010, 07:35:37 AM
Her roots are showing  :O
annnnnd she looks awwwwfully young...... :noid :noid
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: druski85 on April 01, 2010, 09:07:36 AM
annnnnd she looks awwwwfully young...... :noid :noid

No doubt.  Even if she is legal, having a look that young is just not attractive to me.  Then again, neither are the hooters woman or Ms. Crazy face from the first page.  OP has em beat, so far.

To each his own, I suppose. 
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: BoilerDown on April 01, 2010, 11:08:06 AM
The only thing wrong is she's using a macbook... and its in the way.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: uptown on April 01, 2010, 11:10:51 AM
she's 26. Maybe we should start a over 50 wednesday babe for AARPers. :devil

It was not my intention to offend our senior citizens.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: firbal on April 01, 2010, 11:34:16 AM
Still love last weeks bab.   :banana:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: redwing7 on April 01, 2010, 11:35:18 AM
she's 26. Maybe we should start a over 50 wednesday babe for AARPers. :devil

It was not my intention to offend our senior citizens.


 :rofl
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Qrsu on April 01, 2010, 11:35:58 AM
OK. Since we're getting on late in the day I guess I'll try my hand at it.

Hope you like my pick for today.


Enjoy.


(http://www.africapresse.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/sexy-black_girl3.jpg)

Ewww.... a Mac...
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: morfiend on April 01, 2010, 11:55:29 AM
Ewww.... a Mac...



 Q,

  I thought you'd catch the symbolisim.....  eve with the forbiden fruit!!!

 Blooz I'll give ya a  :aok    I may be just nasty enough to appreciate your taste!

   :salute
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: shotgunneeley on April 01, 2010, 12:28:17 PM
Bump n' Grind with the Sixty-Nine!
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Slate on April 01, 2010, 12:57:21 PM
  I'd rather have a double pump her.

(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa19/nonnamanis1967/0000-7511-4Pin-Up-Girl-V8-Engine-Po.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: TheBug on April 01, 2010, 01:09:16 PM
(http://www.123allcelebs.com/pics/regina_deutinger/regina-deutinger%5B1%5D.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: druski85 on April 01, 2010, 01:29:00 PM
she's 26. Maybe we should start a over 50 wednesday babe for AARPers. :devil

It was not my intention to offend our senior citizens.

I'm 24.  She looks young and unattractive, to me.  Once again, to each his own.

<---- Not an  :old:


Lots of airbrushing there, but  :aok nonetheless.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: CAP1 on April 01, 2010, 02:22:02 PM
I'm 24.  She looks young and unattractive, to me.  Once again, to each his own.

<---- Not an  :old:

Lots of airbrushing there, but  :aok nonetheless.


not that old either.......48 physically, much younger mentally.

she looks 16 to me..... :noid
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Maniac on April 01, 2010, 04:14:58 PM
(http://www.themusicmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/rihanna-bikini1.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Blooz on April 01, 2010, 05:18:51 PM
Que the music....

Cinnamon Girl - Neil Young
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAdtUDaBfRA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAdtUDaBfRA)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: DaCoon on April 01, 2010, 06:02:20 PM
(http://www.123allcelebs.com/pics/regina_deutinger/regina-deutinger%5B1%5D.jpg)
Now I'm thirsty for beer.   :cheers:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Bruv119 on April 02, 2010, 06:16:28 AM
(http://www.themusicmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/rihanna-bikini1.jpg)

how could you 'hit' that? 
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: RamPytho on April 02, 2010, 08:44:25 AM
how could you 'hit' that? 


:rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Blooz on April 02, 2010, 02:59:04 PM
Maybe this'll explain it.

Vanilla Ice Cream - Stephen Lynch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rKETOKAO0A (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rKETOKAO0A)

(http://www.clubfuji.com/Ash/hot%20black%20girl.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: mechanic on April 02, 2010, 03:23:46 PM
i'm not usualy one for big boobs but she be gorgeous.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Ruler2 on April 02, 2010, 03:25:46 PM
i'm not usualy one for big boobs but she be gorgeous.
:aok With you all the way mech!
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: CAP1 on April 02, 2010, 04:22:13 PM
Maybe this'll explain it.

Vanilla Ice Cream - Stephen Lynch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rKETOKAO0A (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rKETOKAO0A)

(http://www.clubfuji.com/Ash/hot%20black%20girl.jpg)

 :O :O :O :O :O

near perfection
 :aok
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Vulcan on April 02, 2010, 06:18:52 PM
I've never understood the american desire for plastic :D
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Blooz on April 02, 2010, 06:58:00 PM
I've never understood the american desire for plastic :D

Yeah. Tell me about it.

Hey! Next time you see a drop dead sexy lady with large breasts why don't you ask her? I'm sure she'll tell you a sad story about how she was kidnapped , bound, blindfolded and dragged to a medical clinic and awoke two days later with implants and somehow just couldn't bring it upon herself to have them removed for some reason.

Yeah. It's awful ain't it?
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 03, 2010, 06:52:09 PM
penguin will be along shortly to tell us all of the faults with these beautiful women....unlesssss.....there's another reason he had problems with the first beauty........... :noid :noid

I suppose that I'm going to be the critic now... let us begin  :t

Blooz: Good Grief!  That one made me scream when I first saw her.  The boobs, look like over-filled party balloons, and what's up with the wristband?

But, I like the imagination with the garden hose; overall a 2 out of 5.

Maniac: Better, but the legs make the arms look like toothpicks, and she could use a push-up bra to help with the sideboob.

Yet the face is good-natured and happy, not the typical porn-star scowl or 'get some' face.


TheBug: First off, she looks creepy, and the smile is forced.  The beer bottle makes her look like of the typical American mindless blondes (Not to say that blonds are stupid, but for models, the blond-hair accentuates the inheirent dumbness).  The boobs, literally stick out like sore thumbs, and the enhancement is overdone.  She looks like a Hooters version of Hannah Montana.

Slate: She has a hick-face, and the bra just isn't cutting it (it looks cheap and almost trailer-park esque).  Her chest is well-developed, but a bit on the large side.  The shot seems a a bit cliche.

The car does add a nice touch, though.


So there, a critique of 4 girls.  Maybe I should do this more often.  :devil

-Penguin

Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: TheBug on April 03, 2010, 08:00:39 PM
Sorry Pengueer didn't mean to leave you out.  You ought to find something you like here.

(http://www.retailwiki.nl/wiki02/images/Chippendales.jpeg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: smoe on April 03, 2010, 08:04:44 PM
I'll take 2 of each, except maybe not from TheBug's photo. :x
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: sluggish on April 03, 2010, 08:18:21 PM
I'll take 2 of each, except maybe not from TheBug's photo. :x

Maybe, huh?  Just what are you trying to say?
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 03, 2010, 08:33:06 PM
Sorry Pengueer didn't mean to leave you out.  You ought to find something you like here.

(http://www.retailwiki.nl/wiki02/images/Chippendales.jpeg)

My reaction to that post:

[I see it] AAAAUUUUGH!

[I scroll back up] Maybe it'll be less shocking the second time

[I see it again] GOOD GRIEF! 

[I scroll back up] Perhaps this is an acquired taste

[One last time] MY EYES!  PUT THAT AWAY!

Anyway,

Umm, you know I'm not gay, right?  Hopefully that was a joke.  I gave my honest opinion, and you think that I'm into guys?

Please don't post things that I can't ever un-see.*

-Penguin

*Added to sig
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: 68ZooM on April 03, 2010, 08:36:43 PM
lol well he missed my hooters girls, guess they might have passed, i dunno  :headscratch:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 03, 2010, 08:50:58 PM
Sorry Zoom, here it is.  ( I assume you mean the one that seems to be in the mountains )

That one, actually made me laugh, the idea was ridiculous.  She was less of a sex-kitten, and more of a bobcat.  The torn clothes gave too much away and left little to the imagination.

But I suppose, for shock factor and just all out almost nudity, I'll give her a 3 out of 5.


And for uptown:

Looks like a mindless zombie.  Left me wondering why they put the black dye in her hair, (at the risk of being called gay again) gone with something a bit lighter in tone; perhaps a dark brown.  Lighting isn't the best.

Well managed hair, just enough clothes, they managed to control the boobs this time (note that big isn't bad, its just that they usually don't make it look human).  And the skin tone and lipstick were perfect!

4 out of 5 stars, FTW!

Plawnranc:

(Cracks knuckles, prepares to take this one apart like a Mr. Potato Head)  The fur in the background and the weird blue stripe above it (whatever that is) are out of place.  She appears to have a lazy eye, and the collar/necklace/leash ruin it by adding the BDSM element to a good look.

Wow, did they work on her skin tone and shines.  They add defenition without bulk, and her eyes, hair and lips are well put together.  The faux pas tiger fur is also a nice touch.

4 out of 5, uptown, you're getting there!

-Penguin
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: uptown on April 04, 2010, 11:35:29 AM
He likes mine the best  :neener:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: morfiend on April 04, 2010, 11:48:53 PM
Penguin,

  You still havent commented on the first girl posted by Blooz!

 I'm curious to hear your "impressions" of her,I'll agree that uptowns pic was an excellent choice,I just dont go for Blondes much.......  They're too "hollywood" for me!

   :salute
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Anodizer on April 05, 2010, 04:07:25 AM
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1128/846272138_3dbe71231c_o.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Plawranc on April 05, 2010, 06:19:08 AM
(http://www.mosnews.com/photos/gallery/1118/1122_580x.jpg)

Yank's and Pom's. May I present to you the beauty of Australia.

Ms Jennifer Hawkins  :x
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: VonMessa on April 05, 2010, 07:06:45 AM
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1128/846272138_3dbe71231c_o.jpg)

Professor Anodizer, what's another word for pirate's treasure?         

 :devil
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Saxman on April 05, 2010, 07:20:50 AM
(http://www.mosnews.com/photos/gallery/1118/1122_580x.jpg)

Yank's and Pom's. May I present to you the beauty of Australia.

Ms Jennifer Hawkins  :x

Speaking of Aussies....

(http://www.tvshark.net/imgs/c/yvonne_strahovski_underwear2_lg.jpg)

:D
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: FYB on April 05, 2010, 12:58:07 PM
(http://www.mosnews.com/photos/gallery/1118/1122_580x.jpg)

Yank's and Pom's. May I present to you the beauty of Australia.

Ms Jennifer Hawkins  :x
Dang...  :joystick:
Nice eye Plawranc, she's fine as can be!
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: caldera on April 05, 2010, 01:07:14 PM
(http://www.mosnews.com/photos/gallery/1118/1122_580x.jpg)

Yank's and Pom's. May I present to you the beauty of Australia.

Ms Jennifer Hawkins  :x

Gluteus Perfectimus.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 05, 2010, 04:43:01 PM
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1128/846272138_3dbe71231c_o.jpg)

Good Grief!

Anodizer: She's gap-toothed, overly tatooed, the eye make-up could be done away with, and the plastic wristband is sorely out of place.  She looks like a Jamacian hillbilly!

Good dreadlocks, bra, and her chest was well decorated.

Unfortuanately, I screamed in terror when I first saw her 1 out of 5.


Plawranc: A backdrop of bricks?  They're not even nice bricks.  She looks like a five-year-old, sticking her butt in the camera.  I mean seriously, what do you guys see in butts?  They're where your turd comes out.  And what is going on with her boobs, when you see them, you only see the bra's cup; what's up with that?  Split ends aren't the nicest touch, but if you want a natural look, so be it.  How is her back so tanned but the lumbar so pale?

But DANG!  She's a looker.  Face is great, skin tone is marvellous.  Just enough make-up to avoid the barbie doll look.  Not emaciated, she has some meat on her bones.  Beautiful lips, and good posture minus the weird butt thing.

4 out of 5, the backdrop cheapened it and applied the Cheese-Wiz, making her look like just another model.  But good work, my digeridoo was happy to see her.


Morfiend/Blooz:  I did, I am the 4th poster, counting Blooz's post.

-Penguin


Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: VonMessa on April 05, 2010, 05:24:28 PM
Good Grief!

Anodizer: She's gap-toothed, overly tatooed, the eye make-up could be done away with, and the plastic wristband is sorely out of place.  She looks like a Jamacian hillbilly!

Good dreadlocks, bra, and her chest was well decorated.

Unfortuanately, I screamed in terror when I first saw her 1 out of 5.


Plawranc: A backdrop of bricks?  They're not even nice bricks.  She looks like a five-year-old, sticking her butt in the camera.  I mean seriously, what do you guys see in butts?  They're where your turd comes out.  And what is going on with her boobs, when you see them, you only see the bra's cup; what's up with that?  Split ends aren't the nicest touch, but if you want a natural look, so be it.  How is her back so tanned but the lumbar so pale?

But DANG!  She's a looker.  Face is great, skin tone is marvellous.  Just enough make-up to avoid the barbie doll look.  Not emaciated, she has some meat on her bones.  Beautiful lips, and good posture minus the weird butt thing.

4 out of 5, the backdrop cheapened it and applied the Cheese-Wiz, making her look like just another model.  But good work, my digeridoo was happy to see her.


Morfiend/Blooz:  I did, I am the 4th poster, counting Blooz's post.

-Penguin




Waiting for an acceptable photo.........       :noid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXGhvoekY44 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXGhvoekY44)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: morfiend on April 05, 2010, 05:32:44 PM
 I guess I missed your coments on the original girl,could you kindly point them out to me?

  I see the comments on his second pic but not the first,or am I missing the braclet on the first girl??


   :salute
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Saxman on April 05, 2010, 05:47:57 PM
Speaking of Aussies....

(http://www.tvshark.net/imgs/c/yvonne_strahovski_underwear2_lg.jpg)

:D

Dammit, I hate it when websites deny hot-linking but don't actually SAY they don't so you don't realize it until you view a post in a different browser....

Let's try this one instead:

(http://www.kweens.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/yvonne_strahovski1.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: caldera on April 05, 2010, 06:20:33 PM
Dammit, I hate it when websites deny hot-linking but don't actually SAY they don't so you don't realize it until you view a post in a different browser....

Let's try this one instead:

(http://www.kweens.de/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/yvonne_strahovski1.jpg)

Penguin is gonna hate that wallpaper.  And OMG horizontally striped panties!  Don't even get him started.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 05, 2010, 08:00:54 PM
Alright, it's time to tear this sucker apart.  :salute

Strange change in exposure from a well covering tank-top to erotically turned hips with panties.  The panties look like she just busted out of jail, and navy blue stripes would have been so much better.  Poor lighting, looks like the light came from a Walmart flashlight.

Horizontal stripes?  I like them, they widen the hips to keep her looking real, and keeping her waist-to-hip ratio in line.  Good hair and eyes, and WOW look at that leg-hot!

3 out of 5 for bad lights and no colors on panties.

-Penguin

Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: VonMessa on April 05, 2010, 08:21:59 PM
Alright, it's time to tear this sucker apart.  :salute

Strange change in exposure from a well covering tank-top to erotically turned hips with panties.  The panties look like she just busted out of jail, and navy blue stripes would have been so much better.  Poor lighting, looks like the light came from a Walmart flashlight.

Horizontal stripes?  I like them, they widen the hips to keep her looking real, and keeping her waist-to-hip ratio in line.  Good hair and eyes, and WOW look at that leg-hot!

3 out of 5 for bad lights and no colors on panties.

-Penguin



 :devil

Penguin is a female or a photographer?  (not meant as offensive)

 :salute to your eye for detail.

Your posts are grammatically correct enough that it makes me believe that you possible do this for a living.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: fudgums on April 05, 2010, 08:27:10 PM
The panties look like she just busted out of jail, and navy blue stripes would have been so much better. 

I disagree, think outside the box  :t  :x
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: CAP1 on April 05, 2010, 09:25:50 PM
I disagree, think outside the box  :t  :x

outside the box?

ok.

here's a few pics of someone i know a lot of you have seen, and she has been acknowledged as one of the most beautiful women ever to grace a camera.
 wonder what wonderboy will find wrong with her.
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/Bettie20Page20color1.jpg)
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/bettiepage2.jpg)
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/page1.jpg)
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/bettiepage21.jpg)
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/bettie_01g.jpg)


 the above are all of her from way back before some of us were even born.

 here's one from shortly before she passed. at 80, the woman was still beautiful.
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/bettie-page-80.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Plawranc on April 05, 2010, 10:32:49 PM
(http://images.askmen.com/celebs/women/models_400/415_emily_scottlarge_image-1.jpg)

Now my little tribute to swoop, this is a British Australian Ms Emily Scott, FHM's no 1 pinup
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Banshee7 on April 05, 2010, 10:38:24 PM
I like you Pacman!  (but not the Penguin kind of way!)



LOL, Sorry Penguin.  I can actually say I agree with you on some things.  Every man has a different taste in women!
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: FYB on April 06, 2010, 11:30:25 AM
I like you Pacman!  (but not the Penguin kind of way!)



LOL, Sorry Penguin.  I can actually say I agree with you on some things.  Every man has a different taste in women!
Yeah, but do you really believe a man would not find any of those even a bit attractive, he's rating the half-naked guy pictures higher then the almost naked sexy women pictures.

Uh-oh, run!  :bolt:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: VonMessa on April 06, 2010, 11:38:40 AM
Yeah, but do you really believe a man would not find any of those even a bit attractive, he's rating the half-naked guy pictures higher then the almost naked sexy women pictures.

Uh-oh, run!  :bolt:

That's why I guessed female......

Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 06, 2010, 06:55:15 PM
outside the box?

ok.

here's a few pics of someone i know a lot of you have seen, and she has been acknowledged as one of the most beautiful women ever to grace a camera.
 wonder what wonderboy will find wrong with her.
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/Bettie20Page20color1.jpg)
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/bettiepage2.jpg)
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/page1.jpg)
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/bettiepage21.jpg)
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/bettie_01g.jpg)


 the above are all of her from way back before some of us were even born.

 here's one from shortly before she passed. at 80, the woman was still beautiful.
(http://i200.photobucket.com/albums/aa135/1LTCAP/bettie-page-80.jpg)

Ok, just to clear things up; I am NOT a photographer, and I am a male individual of the species homo sapiens

Ok, now with that out of the way, let's tear these suckers apart.  (NOTE: read this in a high pitched, gay guy voice if you want it to be funny, but that's not my voice!)

In chronological order:

CAP1, Picture 1: Eww, do you see that spill over?  :uhoh  It looks like she has 3 and a half boobs!  She should get a bra that fits.  Flyaway hair also makes it look quite cheap- along with the plastic/metal flower.  She isn't going either way with the clevage, making her different sized boobs even more different  Oh, don't even get me started on her bangs, can you say weirdo?

Good bra, nice tan, good make-up.

2 out of 5 for weird chest, lack of hair control, and a poor bra fit.

CAP1, Picture 2:

Better than before, but the eyes look like they came from a vampire.  The expression is fake and when I look at it for 7-8 seconds, I get the willies, like the kind I get from watching Chuckie.  Again, the hair is frizzy and it's easy to differentiate the bra from the skin.

She looks like she has half a brain in this shot, and oh my, what a smile.

Sadly 2 out of five for creepy face and bad hair.

CAP1, Picture 3:  Aiiiiie!  That one's just frikkin scary!  Her boobs look like someone put De Volaie in her shirt, and her face is just too strange.  She also looks like a genuine Grade-A hick-town idiot!  What with that all over plaid, and old lady style underwear.

But, she has a good pose and has an OK chest (weird boob shape and position)

1 out of 5 man, she looked as smart as a pig and just as pretty.

CAP1, Picture 4:  Her face, is just bizzare; she's making the coochy-poo lips but the rest of her face is intense.  The bra makes her boobs look like ice-cream cones, and her panties/miniskirt (which are they?) are making her lovehandles spill out.  Suspended pantihose?  A poorly calculated touch.  I wouldn't even wish those shoes on my worst enemy, there's no room for her toes or the balls of her feet.  She's also starting to look manly in the face and arms.

Good sized chest, clevage is spot on, and miles of undisputed leg gain her some points. 

2 out of 5 Show me something that isn't trying to 'get some'

CAP1, Picture 5:  Manlady alert! Manlady alert!  Everybody take cover!  Not to get nasty, but she, is ripped.  She has huge muscles and a Neaderthals face.  Has she been working out or some thing?  Again, freaky hair, and an even freakier bra (it looks sharp, I wouldn't want to touch them!).  A weird pro-wrestler belt is around her hips holding up her pantihose, again.  This girl is such a hardcore wannabe, where does she get the idea?  Her hair appears to have been carved out of a solid polyurethane block, and it looks like she's about to get hit by the train that the light is coming from.

But, again, she has a nice chest and miles of leg.

1 out of 5 This picture was terrible, dark, dismal and not at all arousing.


Alright Plawranc, now you get yours.

Ms. Emily Scott?  More like a drunk Hannah Montana at a strip club.  The boobs are just hanging out, flapping uselessly in the wind, and for all of the photoshop power in the world, you can still see where she shaved her armpit hair, last week!  The chest seems very close, but the midriff and hips are quite far away.  It seems to me that the camera had a bad case of fish eye.  She looks annoyed, too, as if she is saying "Just take the picture and stop staring at me!"

Nice clothes, kinda freaky but hey, to each his own  :cheers: .  Great hair, and a beautiful body (below the monsters that have their own ZIP code and take up the shot).  The hair is a bit sparse, but she makes it work well, and a good job on the lipstick is nice.

3 out of 5 for the cliche Hollywood style and a chest that can only be described as overstuffed (seriously, when they filled the silicone bags, what did they use?  A firehose?)

-Penguin





Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: CAP1 on April 06, 2010, 08:09:24 PM
you do realize that she was a very famous model in the 40's right?

no plastic.  :aok
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Plawranc on April 06, 2010, 08:11:55 PM
Right now it has become entertainment for the gentleman and a personal joust between myself and Penguin.

I am determined now to get a 5 from Penguin come hell or highwater.

so now Penguin if you diss this one I will set the sporting body of Australia.

(http://www.marasaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Stephanie-Rice-0001.jpg)

(http://img.xcitefun.net/users/2008/08/9733,xcitefun-stephanie-rice-fhm-1.jpg)

(http://olympics.bradblanks.com/wp-content/uploads/stephanie-rice-fhm.jpg)

This is Stephanie Rice 2 times gold medalist at the Bejing olympics.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Ruler2 on April 06, 2010, 08:41:22 PM
Right now it has become entertainment for the gentleman and a personal joust between myself and Penguin.

I am determined now to get a 5 from Penguin come hell or highwater.

so now Penguin if you diss this one I will set the sporting body of Australia.

(http://www.marasaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Stephanie-Rice-0001.jpg)

(http://img.xcitefun.net/users/2008/08/9733,xcitefun-stephanie-rice-fhm-1.jpg)

(http://olympics.bradblanks.com/wp-content/uploads/stephanie-rice-fhm.jpg)

This is Stephanie Rice 2 times gold medalist at the Bejing olympics.




FINALLY A HOT BRUNETTE!  :D
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 06, 2010, 09:14:59 PM
Right now it has become entertainment for the gentleman and a personal joust between myself and Penguin.

I am determined now to get a 5 from Penguin come hell or highwater.

so now Penguin if you diss this one I will set the sporting body of Australia.

(http://www.marasaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Stephanie-Rice-0001.jpg)

(http://img.xcitefun.net/users/2008/08/9733,xcitefun-stephanie-rice-fhm-1.jpg)

(http://olympics.bradblanks.com/wp-content/uploads/stephanie-rice-fhm.jpg)

This is Stephanie Rice 2 times gold medalist at the Bejing olympics.

Alright Plawranc, let's do this.

Just an overview first off, you are a truly worthy opponent, and I do not wish to anger you.

Picture number one: First off, what's up with those heels?  She's an athelete, not a model.  The transition in exposure of skin is strange, and the look is very different when you look at the top half of the picture versus the bottom.  Fly away hair is still there in too great a quantity.  The tank top looks like she borrowed it from a soccer mom or something.  She's still quite toned from the Olympics, which would get her points if she was wearing tennis shorts and Nike's, but she's made her erotic intentions clear with those ugly, plastic heels.  

On the other hand, though she has the most beautiful face that I've seen so far, relaxed, good natured, and do I see a little grin?  Beautiful skin tone too, not the Crayola bronze freaks that I've been all too often presented with.  

4 out of 5 Plawranc, had she been in a single look, either sporty or sexy, it would have been a five!

Picture 2:  Whoa, what's up with the deer-in-the-headlights expression.  She looks utterly terrified!  Her skin almost melds with her top, making her look like a barbie doll (as in the skin looks like the cotton-fabric blend of the shirt).  The shirt also doesn't warrant the panties, a small skirt would have made the outfit fit together by leaving things for the imagination.  Her legs are quite thick, making the heels (which I'll get to later) look like they were jammed on her feet with a jackhammer.  Her shoes have strange red (felt?) on the bottom, and look like they are made from NERF blaster plastic.  Also, is she lying down or on her hands and knees?  It seems ver strange.

Great hair, and that lower back curving is great.  Her hands are in just the right place, and that tiny little area of her midriff that you can see is amazing.  They managed her assets well, without letting them just hang out there uselessly.

4 out of 5, there's too much athlete to make this shot worthwhile, and her fresh look (athletic) is wasted in the classic 'get some on the couch' shot.


Picture number 3:  Hey can I get some of the drugs that she's been taking, because she's got more of a buzz than a bumble-bee.  Another tragic fail at being hardcore, and the strange, and now recurring fast shift from a concealing top to almost bare legs is weird.  Her hair is mismanaged, and the open sleeves and strange bead chains aren't helping.

They did well to use a push-up bra for this shot, and her legs are smokin' hot this time.  Good cleavage shadows and a flat expanse of midriff save this picture from disaster.

3 out of 5 Plawranc, in this one here she looks like a strange ranger; or just another stupid Hollywood bimbo.  But hey, sometimes it's nice to have a stoned-out-of-her-mind bimbo  :rolleyes: .


Good pictures, something most men can appreciate.  Sorry Plawranc, looks like you were just as close to a 5 as her boobs were close together.  One other thing, can you guys post something else than swimsuit models in all black?  It would be greatly appreciated!  Critiquing clothes is one thing, but critiquing bodies is just off putting.


-Penguin
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Motherland on April 06, 2010, 09:46:57 PM
Susan Coffey --- Gay Test
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey3.jpg)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey2.jpg)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey1.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 06, 2010, 09:51:56 PM
I can't keep going, too tired...

No energy left.  All sources of overcharge gone.

I leave you gentlemen, for another day.

-Penguin
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Banshee7 on April 06, 2010, 10:20:54 PM
Susan Coffey --- Gay Test
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey3.jpg)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey2.jpg)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey1.jpg)

(http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-excited002.gif) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: FYB on April 06, 2010, 10:29:45 PM
Honestly Penguin, you're being irritating; you were funny before, not so much now. Sorry...
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Plawranc on April 06, 2010, 11:38:38 PM
Susan Coffey --- Gay Test
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey3.jpg)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey2.jpg)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey1.jpg)

Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn man.

Can anyone say  :joystick:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Rauch on April 07, 2010, 12:14:40 AM
(http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/kk81/Fenian_album/CBidRed.jpg)

 :cheers:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: VonMessa on April 07, 2010, 05:58:46 AM
Susan Coffey --- Gay Test
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey3.jpg)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey2.jpg)
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t5/AK_Comrade/SusanCoffey1.jpg)

If the carpet matches the curtains, I'm sold.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Gaidin on April 07, 2010, 07:10:21 AM
I Hope Swoop makes it back today!
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Reaper90 on April 07, 2010, 07:28:57 AM
Sorry Penguin, but I've read all the posts, and here's how it breaks down:

0.01% chance you're the president of the Handsome Men's ClubTM and these girls are all sub-standard for you based on the copious quantity of female perfection that you find yourself covered with

0.09% chance you're a glandless nonsexual unmoved by any hormonal impulse to procreate and you view the female form with nerves cold as ice

49.90% chance you're an overweight 30-something sad-sack living with mom and dad, playing on the computer in the basement, and you haven't had a girldfriend since middle school. You would mess your undies if you were even in the same room with a lot of these girls, but put them down here out of sheer resentment of the fact you couldn't get one of them to go cowgirl on you even if you rolled up in a Bentley, lighting cigars with $100 bills.

50% chance you're just flaming ghey.

 :rofl
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Dragon on April 07, 2010, 07:42:54 AM
Whack the penguin.


http://www.funrestarea.com/pages/penguin_baseball.shtml (http://www.funrestarea.com/pages/penguin_baseball.shtml)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: VonMessa on April 07, 2010, 07:52:46 AM
Whack the penguin.


http://www.funrestarea.com/pages/penguin_baseball.shtml (http://www.funrestarea.com/pages/penguin_baseball.shtml)

415 noseplant

492.3 3-point landing (on his feet)

514.4 sliding

 :aok
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Lepape2 on April 07, 2010, 09:03:27 AM
568.5... okay, that's enough. Back to eating breakfast...
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: BowHTR on April 07, 2010, 09:11:02 AM
578.3 sliding
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Dragon on April 07, 2010, 09:18:36 AM
578.7  woo hoo


(http://i364.photobucket.com/albums/oo82/bzavasnik/5787.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 07, 2010, 03:57:44 PM
Sorry Penguin, but I've read all the posts, and here's how it breaks down:

0.01% chance you're the president of the Handsome Men's ClubTM and these girls are all sub-standard for you based on the copious quantity of female perfection that you find yourself covered with

0.09% chance you're a glandless nonsexual unmoved by any hormonal impulse to procreate and you view the female form with nerves cold as ice

49.90% chance you're an overweight 30-something sad-sack living with mom and dad, playing on the computer in the basement, and you haven't had a girldfriend since middle school. You would mess your undies if you were even in the same room with a lot of these girls, but put them down here out of sheer resentment of the fact you couldn't get one of them to go cowgirl on you even if you rolled up in a Bentley, lighting cigars with $100 bills.

50% chance you're just flaming ghey.

 :rofl

Your best bet is incorrect, I do have a girlfriend.  Next, I have some self control, unfortunately for you, you seem to lack it.  I was hoping that this wasn't going to happen, but the fashion critic always gets smacked.  If you guys don't like my opinions about their outfits nobody is forcing you to come on this board at the point of a gun.  Finally, my latest posts aren't as fiery as my previous ones, if you want me to pull out the flamethrower, now's the time to ask.

Maybe you're just flaming.

-Penguin
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: FYB on April 07, 2010, 05:50:41 PM
Your best bet is incorrect, 1. I do have a girlfriend.  Next, I have some self control, unfortunately for you, you seem to lack it.  I was hoping that this wasn't going to happen, but the fashion critic always gets smacked.  If you guys don't like my opinions about their outfits nobody is forcing you to come on this board at the point of a gun.  Finally, my latest posts aren't as fiery as my previous ones, if you want me to pull out the flamethrower, now's the time to ask.

Maybe you're just flaming.

-Penguin
(1.) Doubt that.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: jdbecks on April 07, 2010, 06:02:04 PM
578.7  woo hoo


(http://i364.photobucket.com/albums/oo82/bzavasnik/5787.jpg)

I take your 578.7 and raise it to....

587.1 WOOHOO  :x

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v703/jdbecks/woohoo.jpg)

587.1
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: crazyivan on April 07, 2010, 06:30:51 PM
Honestly Penguin, you're being irritating; you were funny before, not so much now. Sorry...
Yeah, he is truly being ghey.

(http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j281/jessej2/Katherine_Heigl.jpg)

587.6 bounce you stupid penguin bounce. :D
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Banshee7 on April 07, 2010, 08:40:43 PM
I take your 578.7 and raise it to....

587.1 WOOHOO  :x

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v703/jdbecks/woohoo.jpg)

587.1


I take your 587.1 and raise it to...

593 :neener:
(http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff169/banshee7_2007/penguin.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: FYB on April 07, 2010, 09:50:21 PM
I take your 587.1 and raise it to...

593 :neener:
(http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff169/banshee7_2007/penguin.jpg)
484.3 punks...  :devil
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Saxman on April 07, 2010, 10:49:16 PM
I remember playing this game at work while troubleshooting for Comcast internet.

Conquer Antarctica was another good one.
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: cactuskooler on April 08, 2010, 12:27:28 AM
I take your 587.1 and raise it to...

593 :neener:
(http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff169/banshee7_2007/penguin.jpg)

Couldn't resist... 593.5 :D

(http://i547.photobucket.com/albums/hh473/cactuskooler/Untitled-1-1.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 08, 2010, 02:07:46 PM
You guys have raised bashing me to an artform.

-Penguin
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Dragon on April 08, 2010, 02:26:50 PM
At least I had nothing to do with it.    :bolt:



(http://i364.photobucket.com/albums/oo82/bzavasnik/e7h27djpg.gif)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Plawranc on April 09, 2010, 09:11:02 AM
596.2  :neener:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Reaper90 on April 09, 2010, 06:04:30 PM
Your best bet is incorrect, I do have a girlfriend.  Next, I have some self control, unfortunately for you, you seem to lack it.  I was hoping that this wasn't going to happen, but the fashion critic always gets smacked.  If you guys don't like my opinions about their outfits nobody is forcing you to come on this board at the point of a gun.  Finally, my latest posts aren't as fiery as my previous ones, if you want me to pull out the flamethrower, now's the time to ask.

Maybe you're just flaming.

-Penguin

Lighten up, Nancy. Perhaps you missed the "laughter" emoticon that indicated my entire post was tongue-in-cheek, but then again maybe you're just a drama queen. I stand by my point, tho... your "standards" that give a smoking hot babe a '3 out of 5' are rediculous and silly - and you have been critiquing more than just their "outfits." There are probably 2 or 3 out of 'em (+ the d00ds)- at the most -  all that I wouldn't go Ron Jeremy on. Anybody who says differently is either a)blind, b)stupid, or 3)gay.

And I'm sure you do have a girlfriend:

(http://www.omfgod.com/wp-content/gallery/pictures/transvestite.jpg)
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Maniac on April 09, 2010, 06:17:56 PM
Hahahaha!

 :banana:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Banshee7 on April 09, 2010, 07:46:42 PM
Couldn't resist... 593.5 :D

(http://i547.photobucket.com/albums/hh473/cactuskooler/Untitled-1-1.jpg)

Photoshopped!!!

596.2  :neener:

Pictures or it didn't happen  :furious
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: crazyivan on April 09, 2010, 08:36:33 PM
 :rofl well i got 593 anything after that you're using steroids. Possibly rubbing the penguins belly with canola oil. :D
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Plawranc on April 10, 2010, 02:59:20 AM
No, I just am on school hollies and there is absoloutely Foxtrot Alpha to do.

oh and in response to the picture:

 :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 10, 2010, 08:32:23 AM
Lighten up, Nancy. Perhaps you missed the "laughter" emoticon that indicated my entire post was tongue-in-cheek, but then again maybe you're just a drama queen. I stand by my point, tho... your "standards" that give a smoking hot babe a '3 out of 5' are rediculous and silly - and you have been critiquing more than just their "outfits." There are probably 2 or 3 out of 'em (+ the d00ds)- at the most -  all that I wouldn't go Ron Jeremy on. Anybody who says differently is either a)blind, b)stupid, or 3)gay.

And I'm sure you do have a girlfriend:

(http://www.omfgod.com/wp-content/gallery/pictures/transvestite.jpg)

Oops, sorry, my bad, thought that you meant and were just laughing.  When I use sarcasm/tongue in cheek I use the dancing bananna.  But anyway, enough with the flaming.  And where'd I say "standards"?.  Can you highlight it, or did you paraphrase?

-Penguin
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: RTHolmes on April 10, 2010, 01:18:08 PM
Your best bet is incorrect, I do have a girlfriend.  Next, I have some self control, unfortunately for you, you seem to lack it.  I was hoping that this wasn't going to happen, but the fashion critic always gets smacked.  If you guys don't like my opinions about their outfits nobody is forcing you to come on this board at the point of a gun.

sorry to break it to you penguin, but the first thing straight men think about when looking at wed babe pics is not the "outfits"

 :bolt:
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: Penguin on April 10, 2010, 02:29:45 PM
I never said that it was the first thing that I thought about!  :x

-Penguin
Title: Re: The Wednesday Babe
Post by: crazyivan on April 10, 2010, 04:46:58 PM
sorry to break it to you penguin, but the first thing straight men think about when looking at wed babe pics is not the "outfits"

 :bolt:
  Or the track lighting. :devil