Aces High Bulletin Board
Squadron Forums => Squadrons => Topic started by: Letalis on June 03, 2011, 10:30:37 AM
-
As of this posting, I am a squadron of one. Why?
I believe the best squad is one that is like-minded in its goals.
Building a squad from scratch seems the best way of ensuring success even if it takes several months.
LETALITY Squad Goals:
#1 “Get in, Get Even, Get Out.”
#2 “Win the War.” (This means Base captures)
Membership Requirements:
-Maintain a >1:1 K/D in Air to Air engagements. A 1:1 K/D is not average, it is an accomplishment. In AH as in real life, the vast majority of pilots are targets for a skilled minority. Simply keeping a 1:1 puts you in the minority of players.
-Land >25% of your sorties. The goal of every LETALITY member is to land 100% of the time with multiple kills. If you can’t manage 25%, you are probably not trying.
*NOTE: If you are brand-new to the game exceptions can be made. The learning curve in AH can be steep and being part of a squad can decrease the “suck factor” of learning.
-There is no age limit.
-There are no set squad times.
-No Profanity. It takes more effort to key the mic and swear than it takes to swear without the mic. This is still a game and it would be great for all if family members can walk by our computers without hearing a string of expletives.
-Treat others with the respect due.
-In short, try to be a gentleman (that kicks excessive amounts of butt).
-Don’t care about score. LETALITY cares about stats (K/D) and winning the war, not looking good in rank. Our goal is to have a collective prestige that outweighs a single member achieving superstar status.
-Be open to going to the training arena once in a long while. From time to time we will attempt to work out standard operating procedures (SOPs) so we can be more efficient and best use individuals according to specialty. If we royally dork up a mission or find our capture success rate dropping, we will go to the TA to practice for a few minutes in a controlled environment. This might suck from time to time but it is what will separate LETALITY from mob tactics.
Aircraft:
Members don’t have to fly a specific aircraft at any time but officially our fighter will be the F6F. Why? First, All-American versatility at its best. Second, ease of use. The Hellcat is stable with excellent handling throughout the flight envelope. Third, limitations. The F6F is middle of the pack in most performance categories in the overall AH planeset and thus at a disadvantage against the standard MA opposition of 51s, Spixteens, La7s, and 109K4s. Our successes should be dependent on efficient tactics, not an uber ride. The F6F’s poor 6 view is a reminder to every LETALITY SQUAD member not only to check his buddy’s 6 but a reminder that his buddy is doing the same for him.
ROE:
-Fly smart. Survive first, Kill second. If you are the kind of player that will continue an engagement after bingo to pad your kills per hour, this is not the squad for you. This is the squad where two will up, perhaps score as little as one kill, both come home and the mission is still considered a marginal success.
-Since the initial cadre will be closest to my original intent for the squad, these individuals can expect full invite privileges.
-Take pride in the fact our mission execution will be above and beyond the community standard.
-Never apologize for killing someone if the kill meets the criteria of LOAC (Law of Armed Conflict) This means you can kill someone on takeoff roll and not apologize. Right now in Aces High there is an expectation that you will suspend hostilities until they have gained enough altitude to have a reasonable chance of survival (IE killing you). This thinking makes for a more interesting game, keeps uppers from getting ornery and pads stats but it is not required. If you are at their base to win the war, win the war. Vulchees that die and whine are individuals who expect everyone else to yield to their need for immediate gratification. Try to maintain courtesy at all times. If the attacks go personal, let your squaddies defend you first, then go in yourself. “Gentleman” does not equate to “punching bag on 200.”
-Conversely,
Never whine when they make the kill. You took your aircraft to the point in space where he was able to kill you, not him, regardless of how cheap you thought it was. If you can kill using LOAC criteria, so can they- we can’t have it both ways.
About me:
Active Duty Air Force, married with three children. I dabble in real estate, writing books and flight sims. I have played AH intermittently between deployments and TDYs over the last 4yrs. Currently finishing a Masters in Military Studies with a concentration in Strategic Airpower through American Military University.
About the Squad Name:
One of the DVs to visit my ROTC detachment was a 3-Star. He started asking us cadets what set us apart from other professions. The discussion settled on the power to make life and death decisions. He then asked us what set us apart from a cop on the street. I bit and made the case (approaching the question from a philosophical view) that there was no difference. The Air Force pilot and the police officer both have the power of life and death and wether by bullet or bombs their decisions have no functional difference to the person being killed. His response (a pragmatic viewpoint) was that it was LETALITY! The Air Force pilot or missileer can level entire cities. Same effect, different scope. I think he hit on the crux of what sets airpower apart, which was cool. He also had a tendency (animated black man) to leave the H out of “lethality” which also had a cool effect. This was the inspiration for my Handle/Squad name.
If interested in Joining:
PM. Or if in-game: Letalis :salute
-
Lost me at the "No Profanity", but good luck with the new squad :salute
-
Lost me for not listing your dress code. I didn't buy the new evening gown and heels for it to hang in my closet.
-
Lost me at the "No Profanity", but good luck with the new squad :salute
Thanks. I think everything will work out fine as long as the AH community's passive-aggressive wannabe cross-dresser segment remains disinterested. :D
(http://www.failfunnies.com/)
-
One man squad ? That's not a squad that's a loner ..
-
Maybe so, but I would point out that every squad begins with one invite.
-
Maybe so, but I would point out that every squad begins with one invite.
Does not inviter and invitee imply 1+1, therefore 2?
-
My goodness, had no idea this post would violate so many sensibilities. :lol
How many one man squads are out there today? Numerous. Mostly tongue-in-cheek. How many squads are effectively one member most hours of the day or in a given arena? Numerous. This is the only one ballsy enough to recruit so the guy has to be put in his place? He's also picky, what a salamander. There are reasons behind standards and organization- a couple jabs at size/popularity aren't going to change anything there. I shouldn't put words in anyone's mouth, so by all means, elaborate if you want, otherwise move along.
A last parting thought: RL friends usually have better things to do than waste time playing computer games. I get that, but I enjoy it so much more I lost their online presence way back in WB. (Handle was Yipudl) In the AH community, squads I've flown with were awesome fun but sometimes too big, too disorganized and couldn't talk about anything other than the properties of poop or weed or squad politics. That got tiring. Last squad was great as well but too small and apparently disbanded in the last year during my hiatus. I want a squad that talks fluent tactical comm, flies smart and is a great bunch of guys to boot. In the meantime I'll take crap from people with nothing better to do.
-
no disrespect meant here, Have you flown with loose deuce they sound like a squad you would like and fit in well with they fly with tactics and fly smart, plus there a good group, i;m not saying don't for your own squad but heck fly with them once and see :salute
-
squads like this just promote lame game play.
-
No offense taken whatsoever Zoom. I have fond memories of getting schooled by =SAVE= in WB back when I hadn't a clue about flying virtual WWII aircraft. Great squad to be sure, same effect and less work for me. One slight snag: From my time with you Swine back in '08 (anyone remember Lafever?) I gained a slight loyalty for Knits. Add to that the fact the Deuce fly for Rooks and I don't care for killing Pigs... (except Junky...always fun:) Thanks for the suggestion :salute
-
squads like this just promote lame game play.
INK, I know you to be a master of the 1v1 and your midichlorian count is still ridiculous, but I think you're off here- it depends on your point of view... Some folks like fast-paced knife fights, others like meticulously planned missions. Just because an engagement starts out organized doesn't mean it won't break into multiple 1v1s. My 15 bucks dictate having both aspects.
-
INK, I know you to be a master of the 1v1 and your midichlorian count is still ridiculous, but I think you're off here- it depends on your point of view... Some folks like fast-paced knife fights, others like meticulously planned missions. Just because an engagement starts out organized doesn't mean it won't break into multiple 1v1s. My 15 bucks dictate having both aspects.
:rofl
not a starwars fan...thought you were thinly disguising an insult at me.....which I still think you are but whatever.
its lame to have a 51 or 190 or some such plane try to engage you fail on a pass or two and then run like hell.
I guess my point of view is in a GAME were no one dies why fly like your life depended on it.
I don't mind the idea of flying and fighting "smart" as a matter of fact I have been doing that more now then ever.....but I have seen so much dweeby game play lately that I guess the idea of another squad doing that same type of "tactic" just bugs me.
in ether case, it really don't matter to me how someone else flies, just how I fly and fight.
I didn't mean any insult in my post, if you took it that way I am sorry, I have zero couth.
-
No insult there- I remember flying above a 4v1 with you flying a zeke. You got pinged but dispatched three (F4U, 51 and 190) and the 4th left smoking. I was flying a 38L and had to come down and finish you off just to see who it was. :devil Not a big starwars fine either but after that fight the comparison seemed apt. :salute
-
I don't see what all the ruckus is about guys.
He is trying to make a good squad that can double as a base taker squad, which is enjoyable to many people just not me, and a squad that is competent in fighters. Putting up kills and having a good K/D looks the squad and individiual look good.
I would love for people in this game to have skill in taking bases instead of hording up the place and blowing the hell out of every hanger and squirrel possible.
A squad that prides them selves on excellence and skill is good for the game, no matter what their objective is whether it be fighters or rolling bases.
-
TY for the words Stokes, most refreshing. If it works out, the "ruckus" is always well worth it. :salute
-
Good luck with your squadron!
Do you have a website yet?
-
Danke! No website planned, was going to use squad forums/wiki for same function. (I'm cheap) Poor form for a proper squad but a forum/wiki combo would require almost zero maintenance. If a squaddie was bent on technical "extracurricular" stuff, the idea is for the squad to support community functions- IE kick out new maps/skins. :salute
-
See Rule #4
-
See Rule #4
-
Best of luck to you here bud. Its your money and your idea; don't ever let a bunch of us idiots make you try to think otherwise.
-
Best of luck to you here bud. Its your money and your idea; don't ever let a bunch of us idiots make you try to think otherwise.
:aok.
Good luck with recruiting! :salute
-
Good luck bud :salute
-
See Rule #4
-
Oh noes! Curse LLogann's intellect! Why couldn't I just remember the #$%# "h"?? :bhead I am undone!
BreakBreak:
Thanks for the well wishes gents! :salute
-
See Rule #4
-
two man squad yet ?
-
Anyone else want a 2 week vacation from the bulletin board?
This forum is for squads to recruit and answer questions from potential new recruits. If you want to get a suspension from this board, the fastest way to do it is to violate this forum with anything other than that.
-
I don't . I have allready had mine .. Was just asking a simple question .
-
Oh my, look at all the Rule 4's Llogann's scoring. That's sure to put him in the sin bin. Oh dear... such a harsh person given to vulgar language is sure to violate the rules.
I appreaciate Letalis' sentiment but the spelling bugs. What's the major beef with "H"?
I'm not going to qualify consistently anyway. I keep oscillating around that 1:1. I've had brief bursts of as high as 4 but then I always get dragged down, then pulse up. Someday, I'd like to be a consistently >1:1 k/d pilot. I think if I could just expunge the ground fire deaths and the augering (more of a challenge than you might think if you fly the 109) I'd probably help my cause a lot.
-
Where are the rules?
-
Where are the rules?
On the front page
-
Absolutely. Oh Dear. Tssk Tssk LLogan. You must play nice.
-
INK, I know you to be a master of the 1v1 and your midichlorian count is still ridiculous, but I think you're off here- it depends on your point of view... Some folks like fast-paced knife fights, others like meticulously planned missions. Just because an engagement starts out organized doesn't mean it won't break into multiple 1v1s. My 15 bucks dictate having both aspects.
Or 8 on 1. :bolt:
-
Oh my, look at all the Rule 4's Llogann's scoring. That's sure to put him in the sin bin. Oh dear... such a harsh person given to vulgar language is sure to violate the rules.
I appreaciate Letalis' sentiment but the spelling bugs. What's the major beef with "H"?
I'm not going to qualify consistently anyway. I keep oscillating around that 1:1. I've had brief bursts of as high as 4 but then I always get dragged down, then pulse up. Someday, I'd like to be a consistently >1:1 k/d pilot. I think if I could just expunge the ground fire deaths and the augering (more of a challenge than you might think if you fly the 109) I'd probably help my cause a lot.
Mockery thinly veiled as...interest PJ? Was the misspell of "appreciate" a fluke or a funny :headscratch: Regarding your trouble hovering around 1:1, there seem to be two lines of thought related to this. #1 Get a squad. A good wingman will turn you into a consistent 3:1 pilot. #2 If you are in a squad you can't just "cut and run" when a squaddie is in trouble and land your 5 kills. Success of the philosophy depends on your ride. If you like flying Ponies, La7s and K4s you might actually be better off though this is the exception. If you like flying F6Fs and the P47D25 (IE me), I know from experience that a good wingman will turn me from a 3:1 pilot into a 7:1 pilot simply because of the option to disengage from a faster opponent. I have found the latter experience much more fun than flying Ponies. I'm not much of a social bug but I am competitive. The downside to philosophy #2 is that if your wingman sucks, he'll drag you down. Competent wingmen goes a long way towards being a "fun" squad. If the wingman is so bad that you'll be better off alone there's not much justification for a squad is there? "Synergy vs. Suck" is the reason for squadron standards. Shunning standards is a direct route to mediocrity.
This thread has turned into a game of piranhas vs pariah partially because of credibility, partially because it could be seen as some elaborate ruse to name a squad after myself. (Correct Impression?) Do I want folks to see the connection between my handle and an outstanding squad? Darn right I do, and putting up with crap to start the squad is why I'll have earned it.
I'll throw out something of a concession: I regret including any personal info or experiences on this thread simply because it has provided material for the inevitable detractors. I could send each and every one of you (insert appropriate adjective here) half a dozen "hero shots" along with my full SSN and anyone could STILL debate the veracity of point XY or Z. This is the internet, nature of the beast gents. Suffice it to say that cartoon prestige is not a valid reason to compromise personal integrity.
-
Further clarifications:
K/D: Maintaining a 1:1 K/D is an initial requirement only. The requirement will be moot once in the squad since the K/D should only go up. I realize that there are a LOT of people out there much better than their stats would indicate, it merely serves as an initial baseline for getting a decent squad started.
Language: The errant F-bomb is not in any way grounds for getting kicked. I've sworn at the computer but never wasted the bandwidth to advertise my frustration. We're talking habitual strings of compound cusses here.
Update: What little active recruiting I've done has been almost exclusively of the furballing Knit players. (No offense to Rooks/Bish) There is some reasoning here... Right now I'm not a "chesspiece worshipper" but I trend toward the Knights and I've noticed the Knits do not usually win wars in days that in in Y. There is common frustration with organization among Knight players who "give a sh*t" that I'm admittedly trying to take advantage of here. I do not intend for LETALITY to stay Knit forever, but right now a medium-sized organized squad will have the biggest impact on the Knights IMHO.
FYI: No squad invites are being sent out till 4 Jul, that way we can claim a notable date for the SQ birthday ;)
In the meantime. I look forward to winging up with interested gents and pestering good sticks that "need work." :salute
-
Mockery thinly veiled as...interest PJ? Was the misspell of "appreciate" a fluke or a funny :headscratch: Regarding your trouble hovering around 1:1, there seem to be two lines of thought related to this. #1 Get a squad. A good wingman will turn you into a consistent 3:1 pilot. #2 If you are in a squad you can't just "cut and run" when a squaddie is in trouble and land your 5 kills. Success of the philosophy depends on your ride. If you like flying Ponies, La7s and K4s you might actually be better off though this is the exception. If you like flying F6Fs and the P47D25 (IE me), I know from experience that a good wingman will turn me from a 3:1 pilot into a 7:1 pilot simply because of the option to disengage from a faster opponent. I have found the latter experience much more fun than flying Ponies. I'm not much of a social bug but I am competitive. The downside to philosophy #2 is that if your wingman sucks, he'll drag you down. Competent wingmen goes a long way towards being a "fun" squad. If the wingman is so bad that you'll be better off alone there's not much justification for a squad is there? "Synergy vs. Suck" is the reason for squadron standards. Shunning standards is a direct route to mediocrity.
This thread has turned into a game of piranhas vs pariah partially because of credibility, partially because it could be seen as some elaborate ruse to name a squad after myself. (Correct Impression?) Do I want folks to see the connection between my handle and an outstanding squad? Darn right I do, and putting up with crap to start the squad is why I'll have earned it.
I'll throw out something of a concession: I regret including any personal info or experiences on this thread simply because it has provided material for the inevitable detractors. I could send each and every one of you (insert appropriate adjective here) half a dozen "hero shots" along with my full SSN and anyone could STILL debate the veracity of point XY or Z. This is the internet, nature of the beast gents. Suffice it to say that cartoon prestige is not a valid reason to compromise personal integrity.
sorry I came off a bit harsh, truly good luck with the squad.
these words I completely agree with
as you can see by my highlighting of them :D....words to live by :salute
-
No worries,
Bridge up here...
Water down here...
:salute
-
Mockery thinly veiled as...interest PJ? Was the misspell of "appreciate" a fluke or a funny :headscratch:
It's a little irony coupled with incompetent fingers. Otherwise, I actually appreciate this argument as well. I have a squad but we are typically only working together in FSO - and even then, just barely (though I note squaddie JVBicwill and I did considerable damage in our 2 Brewies Friday before getting killed, in my case by a friendly who was trailing the same Yak as I - Bic got 5, I got 2k/3a/1bldg). I fly a g-14 in the MA, generally, usually enabling an escape, depending, and generally do so alone.
Not to name names but it was Bino, who I can't blame. I kept stitching that Yak with my one remaining .30 and he wouldn't go down.
You're absolutely right about standards. Without them, your squad wil be just a group of guys of varying quality, most of whom will never work together. If I could stomach the 6 view of that F6, I might even be tempted.
-
Best of luck with the new squad. :aok
After running one for 15 years I am enjoying retirement and the position of a simple spear carrier. :)
My advice would be:
1. Don't take it too serious.
2. Make fun a priority.
3. Make, making friends a priority.
4. Never place AH time before the family time.
5. Ignore the egos and idiots.
6. If the truth offends, let it offend, but always be respectful.
7. Don't put up with drama. Just boot them out and move on.
8. Humility will carry you a long way and not give your enemy any ammunition.
Much of what you posted suggests you already have most of it covered. :aok
<S>
-
Best of luck with the new squad. :aok
After running one for 15 years I am enjoying retirement and the position of a simple spear carrier. :)
My advice would be:
5. Ignore the egos and idiots.
<S>
Great. That'll leave him with a squadron of 1 - and he won't be sure about that last guy.
-
lol
To be sure sometimes the pickings are slim. :)
-
Best of luck with the new squad. :aok
After running one for 15 years I am enjoying retirement and the position of a simple spear carrier. :)
My advice would be:
1. Don't take it too serious.
2. Make fun a priority.
3. Make making friends a priority.
4. Never place AH time before the family time.
5. Ignore the egos and idiots.
6. If the truth offends, let it offend, but always be respectful.
7. Don't put up with drama. Just boot them out and move on.
8. Humility will carry you a long way and not give your enemy any ammunition.
Much of what you posted suggests you already have most of it covered. :aok
<S>
Thank you for the advice sir, a cartoon squadron from scratch is certainly a departure from my typical pursuits-any advice welcome. :salute
Break
PJ, even with tip #5 factored in, I estimate 1.96 AH subscribers worthy of membership in the prestigious concept that is Letality. 1.96 rounds up to 2. Win. :rock Problem is they are probably :uhoh both on outstanding squads already...
-
wow this thread is lethal
:bolt:
-
wow this thread is lethal
:bolt:
Actually this thread is LETAL...to fit with squad name. :bhead
-
"Lethality" while an example of proper spelling lacks a certain edgy emphasis. Adding the H just makes it look lethargic. :old:
When looking for a handle with some semblance of meaning I thought about that little exchange with the General. Having taken some latin myself I had to wonder if perhaps the general had as well. ("Letality" was not the only latin compound he used, but definitely the coolest- had to be there)
lethal- +
(Latin: deadly, mortal)
From Latin letalis, "deadly, fatal"; from letum, "death".
http://wordinfo.info/unit/1175/ip:4/il:L
One could make the case that the inclusion of the letter H is farther from the original spelling eh?
Stay thirsty my friends. :cheers:
-
lethal- +
(Latin: deadly, mortal)
From Latin letalis, "deadly, fatal"; from letum, "death".
Me likee. I had to take some latin in Middle School.
This is roughly the second time I've enjoyed latin.
The first time: It came in handy when I had to decode, for several friends, the slightly tricky translation of the Carlsberg Elephant label: "Laboremus pro patria". The maker had a little sense of humor, given the older meaning of the verb...
Either way, you pass. Had I known you were basing off the latin root, I'd've granted carte blanche (didn't even think to check it).
-
GL with your new squad, wish you the best of luck :salute
-
He came to his senses and re-joined POTW :aok
-
=LETALITY!= is not to be. Canx. Finito. Caput. Wasted drama. Curtains.
There was a little bit of a nucleus forming...BUT two weeks in still zero hard commits out of the gate. Nobody wanted to be the first because everybody wanted to "wait and see." Initially I was prepared to take the time to "get it right" but ultimately I have not afforded that time and it is likely for the best.
Ze Frau was concerned I'd get too competitive/spend more time online even after I wasn't having fun as a Sq CO. She's right, I wouldn't have stopped till I had forged the best base-busting squad in the game. I already beginning to put "work" into a game and it's not like I don't have a full plate outside cartoon world. (Teeter...)
Tonight Rogent has recruited me back to POTW. (He recruited me when I was just starting AH) After three yrs we caught up a bit and history has repeated itself. Pleasant deja vu. I did enjoy my time with the swine and ultimately the game is supposed to be about fun and not brutal 100% pinpoint efficiency. No training relative newbs, no SOPs, no organizing XYZ or building webpages... I have succumbed! I began AH in mud and to mud I shall return... Letality! was/is a great concept with a great backstory. Alas, a humble spear carrying Pig I shall be in cartoonland, but I look forward to it. :)
Sincere apologies for the whiplash to gents "on the fence" and thanks again to the well-wishers esp The Loose Deuce and The Few!
:salute
(Flamesuit on for the inevitable glute-pushers :ahand)
-
=LETALITY!= is not to be. Canx. Finito. Caput. Wasted drama. Curtains.
There was a little bit of a nucleus forming...BUT two weeks in still zero hard commits out of the gate. Nobody wanted to be the first because everybody wanted to "wait and see." Initially I was prepared to take the time to "get it right" but ultimately I have not afforded that time and it is likely for the best.
Ze Frau was concerned I'd get too competitive/spend more time online even after I wasn't having fun as a Sq CO. She's right, I wouldn't have stopped till I had forged the best base-busting squad in the game. I already beginning to put "work" into a game and it's not like I don't have a full plate outside cartoon world. (Teeter...)
Tonight Rogent has recruited me back to POTW. (He recruited me when I was just starting AH) After three yrs we caught up a bit and history has repeated itself. Pleasant deja vu. I did enjoy my time with the swine and ultimately the game is supposed to be about fun and not brutal 100% pinpoint efficiency. No training relative newbs, no SOPs, no organizing XYZ or building webpages... I have succumbed! I began AH in mud and to mud I shall return... Letality! was/is a great concept with a great backstory. Alas, a humble spear carrying Pig I shall be in cartoonland, but I look forward to it. :)
Sincere apologies for the whiplash to gents "on the fence" and thanks again to the well-wishers esp The Loose Deuce and The Few!
:salute
(Flamesuit on for the inevitable glute-pushers :ahand)
Another piggly wiggly wingy thingy to shoot down. :aok
Please talk to ChangeUp and let me know what secret he has that enables him to consistanly shoot down my spitfire. :D. He won't tell me. :cry
:salute your decision. They appear to me to be a great squad. Not quite as awesome as The Few, but great nevertheless.
-
Another piggly wiggly wingy thingy to shoot down. :aok
Please talk to ChangeUp and let me know what secret he has that enables him to consistanly shoot down my spitfire. :D. He won't tell me. :cry
:salute your decision. They appear to me to be a great squad. Not quite as awesome as The Few, but great nevertheless.
With all respect due to The Few and just basing this on what I have seen, and this not intended as bashing, in their way of playing; POTW is about having fun rather than scores. But still good fights when our paths cross
-
Another piggly wiggly wingy thingy to shoot down. :aok
I only have three words for ya Midway -Come get some. :aok
-
I smell bacon... but it was Midway that made me feel ill :uhoh
-
With all respect due to The Few and just basing this on what I have seen, and this not intended as bashing, in their way of playing; POTW is about having fun rather than scores. But still good fights when our paths cross
None taken Rogent :salute I dont think Midway meant anything by what he said but then again he is a troll :D
-
None taken Rogent :salute I dont think Midway meant anything by what he said but then again he is a troll :D
:noid
What he said.
-
None taken Rogent :salute I dont think Midway meant anything by what he said but then again he is a troll :D
A homeless troll... He hasn't found a bridge yet to live under. :banana:
-
A homeless troll... He hasn't found a bridge yet to live under. :banana:
No he hasn't poor lil guy, but he does keep a few peoples ankles hair free.
-
Now I'm curious as to what Midway did or did not do to so endear himself to you all. It can't have had much to do with this bbs, given the source's dearth of posts.
-
Now I'm curious as to what Midway did or did not do to so endear himself to you all. It can't have had much to do with this bbs, given the source's dearth of posts.
:O Ooh, I know, I know.... Let me answer this one...
:old: Midway talks too much on channel 200. :bhead
-
POTW is about having fun rather than scores.
You obv havn't seen my score LOL
-
:O Ooh, I know, I know.... Let me answer this one...
:old: Midway talks too much on channel 200. :bhead
I like it when players not only talk too much on 200 but do so drunkenly in obscenity-laced, grammatically faulty torrents. If compound words feature in the harangue and especially if the tirade is directed at many other players, it's even better.
If they do so, I usually just witness and chuckle. I figure, hey, a free entertainment increment for my fi'teen bux. I think it'd be even better if omebody could embarass themselves with uncontrolled bodily functions but such a thing isn't really possible on 200. That's the problem with buffoonery - it just doesn't lend itself to electronic media all that well. Now, vox, otoh, can get really GOOD if you like drunken buffoonery and obscenity.
As for your "problem", it it something specific or do they just think you yapp-tee-yap too much?
-
I like it when players not only talk too much on 200 but do so drunkenly in obscenity-laced, grammatically faulty torrents. If compound words feature in the harangue and especially if the tirade is directed at many other players, it's even better.
If they do so, I usually just witness and chuckle. I figure, hey, a free entertainment increment for my fi'teen bux. I think it'd be even better if omebody could embarass themselves with uncontrolled bodily functions but such a thing isn't really possible on 200. That's the problem with buffoonery - it just doesn't lend itself to electronic media all that well. Now, vox, otoh, can get really GOOD if you like drunken buffoonery and obscenity.
As for your "problem", it it something specific or do they just think you yapp-tee-yap too much?
They just think I yapp-tee-yap too much, and perhaps HO too much, but otherwise I'm an :angel:
-
In my defense, I would like to point out that this particular reply was commending Letalis for how well he handled my trolling. In the manner in which he did reply I can easily see him to be a person worthy of my respect and the respect of others in this game.
See Rule #4
I'd also tell Skuzzy that I'm terribly sorry for the grief I cause, but after the first 1000 times, I'm sure he's sick and tired of listening to me pile on the horse crap. :D