Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: DMVIAGRA on October 11, 2011, 03:12:54 PM

Title: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: DMVIAGRA on October 11, 2011, 03:12:54 PM
Early Tanks

US:
M3 Stuart (Light)
M3 Lee

UK:
Matilda
MK I

Germany:
Panzer I
Panzer II
Panzer III
(All Panzer)

Russia:
BT7 :huh
T-35

Add Some More To The Wish List, I'm Sure Some Of My Choices May Be Projects.
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: skorpion on October 11, 2011, 03:53:11 PM
Early Tanks

US:
M3 Stuart (Light)
M3 Lee

UK:
Matilda
MK I

Germany:
Panzer I
Panzer II
Panzer III
(All Panzer)

Russia:
BT7 :huh
T-35

Add Some More To The Wish List, I'm Sure Some Of My Choices May Be Projects.
were getting the panzer 3. its on the homepage, other than that i give this a +1
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: AKP on October 11, 2011, 04:29:57 PM
were getting the panzer 3. its on the homepage, other than that i give this a +1

We are getting an earlier version of the panzer 4... not the 3.  Just sayin.
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: skorpion on October 11, 2011, 04:53:24 PM
We are getting an earlier version of the panzer 4... not the 3.  Just sayin.
i thought that was the panzer 3, considering the gun on it and it doesnt have skirts.
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: gyrene81 on October 11, 2011, 04:58:03 PM
i thought that was the panzer 3, considering the gun on it and it doesnt have skirts.
research, research, research...aside from the fact that it plainly says panzer iv f1/f1 on the pics...i see an eye doctor in your future
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: skorpion on October 11, 2011, 05:01:35 PM
research, research, research...aside from the fact that it plainly says panzer iv f1/f1 on the pics...i see an eye doctor in your future
6 second looks at pictures dont always reveal everything....

and i have 20/10 vision. eye doctor? not anytime soon.
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: gyrene81 on October 11, 2011, 05:08:03 PM
6 second looks at pictures dont always reveal everything....

and i have 20/10 vision. eye doctor? not anytime soon.
6 seconds and you didn't notice the huge PANZER IV SCREENSHOTS on the announcement???

not to mention the big PANZER IV F1/F2 on the lower left corner of the pic?

ya, 20/10 vision...riiiight
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: SmokinLoon on October 11, 2011, 05:13:19 PM
i thought that was the panzer 3, considering the gun on it and it doesnt have skirts.

We are all human and hence we all make mistakes.  but damn.... ... ... STOP SHOOTING FROM THE HIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!     :bhead

Now that I've got that out of my system, I suggest you obtain some sources for reference.  Used book stores have a wealth of information for 1/5th the cost.  Or, ask for them as a gift.  Usually, once you read, re-read, discuss, research, discuss some more, read, re-read, write some research papers, discuss, and read some more you will understand some of the nuts and bolts of WWII and get beyond A: the populist image of WWII, and B: miniscule mistakes and over-generalization as in like the one you did above.   ;)

 :salute  
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: skorpion on October 11, 2011, 05:58:51 PM
ya, 20/10 vision...riiiight
want the proof? ask my eye doctor. im sure he'd give you the facts.
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: 10thmd on October 11, 2011, 06:28:03 PM
i thought that was the panzer 3, considering the gun on it and it doesnt have skirts.
6 second looks at pictures dont always reveal everything....

and i have 20/10 vision. eye doctor? not anytime soon.

(http://i810.photobucket.com/albums/zz30/nerd_by_proxy/demotivational-posters-mr-t-facepalm.jpg)
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: bortas1 on October 11, 2011, 06:36:36 PM
Early Tanks

US:
M3 Stuart (Light)
M3 Lee

UK:
Matilda
MK I

Germany:
Panzer I
Panzer II
Panzer III
(All Panzer)

Russia:
BT7 :huh
T-35

Add Some More To The Wish List, I'm Sure Some Of My Choices May Be Projects.
:salute total agreement plus some french tanks
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: SmokinLoon on October 11, 2011, 07:53:01 PM
want the proof? ask my eye doctor. im sure he'd give you the facts.

That would mean you have super human vision.   :aok  LOL!!!   :rofl

Do you know what 20/20 or 20/100, or even 20/10 means???   
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Raphael on October 11, 2011, 07:56:43 PM
research, research, research...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFBDn5PiL00
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: MK-84 on October 11, 2011, 08:00:18 PM
want the proof? ask my eye doctor. im sure he'd give you the facts.

 :rolleyes:
Dude..it...like..says what it is on the homepage...

...If you're old enough to drink you got an excuse but...
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Tyrannis on October 11, 2011, 08:08:11 PM
 :rofl


Anyways, personally i think the m3 lee deserves to be added before the Pnzer III. but i wouldnt argue against ether.
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Guppy35 on October 11, 2011, 08:16:08 PM
6 second looks at pictures dont always reveal everything....

and i have 20/10 vision. eye doctor? not anytime soon.

Count the road wheels.  8 is a Panzer IV, 6 for the Panzer III.
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: guncrasher on October 12, 2011, 03:59:08 AM
cool add things for the 5 guys that play aw  :devil.

semp
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: DMVIAGRA on October 13, 2011, 06:34:23 AM
cool add things for the 5 guys that play aw  :devil.

semp

Yes, but they would be a nice addition. I don't play EW too often, but imagine these in the Main Arena you know. They're small, they'd be difficult to hit, but easily crippled. M3 Lee would be nice though!
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Rino on October 13, 2011, 09:21:01 AM
     I do have to wonder about the Pz 1 though.  Do you really want a tank that is outgunned by an M3 halftrack?  :P
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Bino on October 13, 2011, 10:49:14 AM
Count the road wheels.  8 is a Panzer IV, 6 for the Panzer III.

Anorak!   ;)

Me, I could go for a PzKw. III ausf. J, with the 50mm L/60 gun.   :aok
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: killerdude8 on October 13, 2011, 09:40:22 PM
i think they should add mobile flak guns y'know like pom poms and what not.
I'd give an example but i dont know of any.  :aok

EDIT: i was watching a documentry about an assault in france and they mentioned something about a french super tank. I ended up finding out what this beast is called: CHAR 2C  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Char_2C
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Rino on October 13, 2011, 10:52:10 PM
     You mean like the Ostwind and the Wirblewind?  Only ones I can think of are the Canadian Skink and I'm not sure it
saw combat and the M-19 in which only 285 were made.

     Skink:
(http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/can/skinkA.jpg)

     M-19:
(http://www.battletanks.com/images/M19A1b_by_Shawn.jpg)

     As far as the Char 2C goes, it says right in the article that it was never deployed..sorry

Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Tyrannis on October 13, 2011, 11:41:28 PM
     You mean like the Ostwind and the Wirblewind?  Only ones I can think of are the Canadian Skink and I'm not sure it
saw combat and the M-19 in which only 285 were made.

     Skink:
(http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/can/skinkA.jpg)

     M-19:
(http://www.battletanks.com/images/M19A1b_by_Shawn.jpg)

     As far as the Char 2C goes, it says right in the article that it was never deployed..sorry


the fact that only 285 were made doesnt mean anything to its conclusion. i believe around only 40 ta152s were made. If it has a good sustanable period of combat action, than its eligable.
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: killerdude8 on October 13, 2011, 11:54:08 PM
somewhat like those, but what im talking about is, flak like twin 5"s on CV taskgroups. i know there was like 2 german tanks mounted with 88's that shot flak shells. If you can find one of those then well be in buisness.  :rock
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Rino on October 14, 2011, 07:47:09 AM
the fact that only 285 were made doesnt mean anything to its conclusion. i believe around only 40 ta152s were made. If it has a good sustanable period of combat action, than its eligable.

     Since it was created in late 44 sustainable combat action versus a practically non existant LW would have been
difficult and I have never seen any evidence of use in the PTO.  Apparently some were used in a ground support role,
not sure how sustainable that was either  :D
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: guncrasher on October 14, 2011, 08:59:44 AM
Yes, but they would be a nice addition. I don't play EW too often, but imagine these in the Main Arena you know. They're small, they'd be difficult to hit, but easily crippled. M3 Lee would be nice though!

you play world of tanks dont you?  which is how you came up with the idea.  now you do realize that a jeep will kill most of these tanks, you dont have to use the main gun, the .50 cal on top is enough.  and the firepower that these "tanks" have, what exactly you planing to kill with them?  even a building takes 3 shots.


semp
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: 1Nicolas on October 14, 2011, 10:08:35 AM
Early Tanks

US:
M3 Stuart (Light)
M3 Lee

UK:
Matilda
MK I

Germany:
Panzer I
Panzer II
Panzer III
(All Panzer)

Russia:
BT7 :huh
T-35

Add Some More To The Wish List, I'm Sure Some Of My Choices May Be Projects.
In order to show em' Nazi tanks a lesson, add the LW 105mm Sherman tank or M4(105)!
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: Tyrannis on October 14, 2011, 10:11:30 AM
In order to show em' Nazi tanks a lesson, add the LW 105mm Sherman tank or Jumbo Sherman!
ive been begging for the 105mm Howitzer Sherman for along time.
But don't think that just because its got that big "105mm" number, that its a devastating tank killer.

And wasn't the jumbo sherman basically a Sherman which had thicker frontal armor than a tiger, but only packed the 75mm cannon?
Title: Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
Post by: bortas1 on October 14, 2011, 10:16:45 AM
Yes, but they would be a nice addition. I don't play EW too often, but imagine these in the Main Arena you know. They're small, they'd be difficult to hit, but easily crippled. M3 Lee would be nice though!
:salute i really dont remember but, us called m3 grant, brits called them lee. i could be wrong.