Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: alpini13 on October 15, 2011, 12:21:39 AM

Title: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: alpini13 on October 15, 2011, 12:21:39 AM: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters. we should have at least an axis transport and here are a few others as well. JU-52
SM-82
A.W.41 Albemarle
Kawasaki Ki 56 Thalia
Mitsubishi Ki 57 Topsy
Yakovlev Yak 6
Caudron C.440 Seagull
and we dont need a c-54.
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: bortas1 on October 15, 2011, 12:30:35 AM: dont forget the german heavy tranport umm goth i think.
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: cactuskooler on October 15, 2011, 12:44:24 AM: Don't forget the C-46 too!
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Rino on October 15, 2011, 09:54:18 AM: Forget em all :D
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: titanic3 on October 15, 2011, 11:01:28 AM: Me 323 :noid

Just because....

(http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/images/me323-1.jpg)
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Seanaldinho on October 15, 2011, 11:20:05 AM: Quote from: cactuskooler on October 15, 2011, 12:44:24 AM
Don't forget the C-46 too!

Does anyone else find that bird oddly sexy?
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: stabbyy on October 15, 2011, 12:41:04 PM: you left out the cb-40
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: guncrasher on October 15, 2011, 04:11:09 PM: what about the spruce goose.

semp
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Karnak on October 15, 2011, 04:18:11 PM: H8K1-L.

And since the H8K1-L will have been added, they might as well do the H8K2. :P
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Lusche on October 15, 2011, 04:25:39 PM: Quote from: Karnak on October 15, 2011, 04:18:11 PM
H8K1-L.

And since the H8K1-L will have been added, they might as well do the H8K2. :P

An evil scheme... :noid
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: B-17 on October 15, 2011, 04:28:40 PM: :crybaby JU-52 DAMMIT!
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Guppy35 on October 15, 2011, 10:37:16 PM: I think the easiest additions would be the C-118 and LB30.
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: bortas1 on October 15, 2011, 10:50:13 PM: Quote from: titanic3 on October 15, 2011, 11:01:28 AM
Me 323 :noid

Just because....

(http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/images/me323-1.jpg)
:salute yeah thats the one thought it was called the goth for some reason
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Lusche on October 15, 2011, 10:51:16 PM: Quote from: Guppy35 on October 15, 2011, 10:37:16 PM
I think the easiest additions would be the C-118 [...]

A postwar plane? :headscratch:
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Guppy35 on October 15, 2011, 11:02:32 PM: Quote from: Lusche on October 15, 2011, 10:51:16 PM
A postwar plane? :headscratch:

Oops. Typo C-108
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: cactuskooler on October 15, 2011, 11:15:22 PM: And C-87.
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: SDGhalo on October 17, 2011, 03:45:04 PM: why not the short stirling Transport Variant
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: icepac on October 17, 2011, 07:38:35 PM: Just add a top gun to the C47 and call it a LI2.

(http://mig3.sovietwarplanes.com/li-2/li-2camo/li2niivvs.jpg)

bombs......hmmmm
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: lyric1 on October 17, 2011, 09:25:20 PM: Quote from: icepac on October 17, 2011, 07:38:35 PM
Just add a top gun to the C47 and call it a LI2.

(http://mig3.sovietwarplanes.com/li-2/li-2camo/li2niivvs.jpg)

bombs......hmmmm
:O Those things carried bombs. :devil
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: titanic3 on October 17, 2011, 09:32:26 PM: IMO, the Me323 would be the only transport that would be able to compete with a C47. Trading speed for defensive guns and stronger airframe. I'd definately use it over the C47. A group of Me323 would be both fun to intercept OR fly in.
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: lyric1 on October 17, 2011, 09:39:12 PM: Beaufort IX then. :aok

Will get a Beau in one way or another.

(http://i1002.photobucket.com/albums/af142/barneybolac/BEAU.jpg)
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Raptor05121 on October 17, 2011, 09:50:56 PM: Ju-52/3 stands the strongest chance of getting added IMHO
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: titanic3 on October 17, 2011, 09:57:09 PM: The Ju52 would only see use for scenarios (Like the short barreled Panzer IV), it's slower than the C47, less manuverable and trades all that for 1x 7.9mm MG. (Or was it 2x?)

In the MA, it would be a hangar queen.
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: B-17 on October 17, 2011, 10:19:22 PM: Meh. So is the lanc... If I remember correctly from my two weeks...
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Raptor05121 on October 17, 2011, 10:19:57 PM: Then lets get the C-46. Twice the troop carrying capability, double the volumetric loading for cargo, with bigger engines allowing faster flight and quicker climbs (if you choose to).
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: DeadStik on October 17, 2011, 11:02:49 PM: Quote from: B-17 on October 17, 2011, 10:19:22 PM
Meh. So is the lanc... If I remember correctly from my two weeks...

You remember incorrectly.
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: guncrasher on October 18, 2011, 02:07:13 AM: Quote from: Raptor05121 on October 17, 2011, 10:19:57 PM
Then lets get the C-46. Twice the troop carrying capability, double the volumetric loading for cargo, with bigger engines allowing faster flight and quicker climbs (if you choose to).

it can only carry 10 troops max. that's the ah limit.

semp
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: Raptor05121 on October 18, 2011, 10:16:40 AM: Quote from: guncrasher on October 18, 2011, 02:07:13 AM
it can only carry 10 troops max. that's the ah limit.

semp

I'm fine with that. You could still get those 10 troops there faster. Or maybe 10 troops + 1 field cargo or just 2 field cargos or 10 vehicle supplies +1 field cargo or 20 vehicle supplies. the possibilities are endless.

+1 for C-46
Title: Re: How about a new transport aircraft since we arnt getting all new fighters
Post by: B-17 on October 18, 2011, 05:10:06 PM: +1 C-46