Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Tank-Ace on October 20, 2011, 10:53:56 PM

Title: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 20, 2011, 10:53:56 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Jayhawk on October 20, 2011, 10:56:00 PM
Ripsnort      25662
lazs2              24886
Krusty      23246
Skuzzy      20789
Masherbrum      20017

20,000+ posts.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tordon22 on October 20, 2011, 11:05:12 PM
This girl is still here?
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: MachFly on October 20, 2011, 11:09:33 PM
Ripsnort      25662
lazs2              24886
Krusty      23246
Skuzzy      20789
Masherbrum      20017

20,000+ posts.

I never realized Skuzzy was radioactive, I got to stay away from him now.   :neener:  :bolt:
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: oakranger on October 20, 2011, 11:10:02 PM
Ripsnort      25662
lazs2              24886
Krusty      23246
Skuzzy      20789
Masherbrum      20017

20,000+ posts.


40,000 will be "God"
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Melvin on October 20, 2011, 11:15:12 PM
Jeez, it's gonna take me 38-39 years to reach radioactive status.

Of course at the rate I'm going, I'll be perma-banned before Christmas anyway so screw it.  :aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: oakranger on October 20, 2011, 11:23:45 PM
Jeez, it's gonna take me 38-39 years to reach radioactive status.

Of course at the rate I'm going, I'll be perma-banned before Christmas anyway so screw it.  :aok

LOL


I have been banned four times.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Masherbrum on October 20, 2011, 11:24:30 PM
This girl is still here?

 :rofl
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: grizz441 on October 20, 2011, 11:29:53 PM
Congrats Karaya, 20,000 1 star posts and counting.  :D
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Jayhawk on October 20, 2011, 11:46:10 PM
At my current rate, it would take 13.03 years to get to radioactive.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: sunfan1121 on October 20, 2011, 11:55:30 PM
You could tell karaya was making the big push when every other post of his was a  :aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: oakranger on October 21, 2011, 12:35:19 AM
At my current rate, it would take 13.03 years to get to radioactive.

Do you plan on sticking around for that long?
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 21, 2011, 12:44:53 AM
Hell, its questionable if AH will last another 13 years. It will be 2025 by then, and quite possibly AH will have became as one with Air Warrior. I hope it doesn't, as this is without a doubt the best game I've ever played, but its possible.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Meatwad on October 21, 2011, 06:32:43 AM
You could tell karaya was making the big push when every other post of his was a  :aok
:aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Wildcat1 on October 21, 2011, 06:35:01 AM
:aok

 :rofl :aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: 4deck on October 21, 2011, 06:46:42 AM
 :rofl
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: ozrocker on October 21, 2011, 08:26:00 AM
We need a chart Herr Schneke,

What the average posts per (minute, day,etc) of people that have reached the Nuke status.
Hours of life spent on BBS.


                                                                                                                  :cheers: Oz   
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: moot on October 21, 2011, 08:46:56 AM
We need a chart Herr Schneke,

What the average posts per (minute, day,etc) of people that have reached the Nuke status.
Hours of life spent on BBS.


                                                                                                                  :cheers: Oz   
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php?action=stats
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Jayhawk on October 21, 2011, 09:37:28 AM
We need a chart Herr Schneke,

What the average posts per (minute, day,etc) of people that have reached the Nuke status.
Hours of life spent on BBS.


                                                                                                                  :cheers: Oz   

Ironically, none of those nuke boys are on the top 10 "most time online" list.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: grizz441 on October 21, 2011, 09:39:26 AM
Ironically, none of those nuke boys are on the top 10 "most time online" list.

If you click your refresh button on forum within fifteen minutes of previous click then all that time counts towards online.  If you spend 16 minutes or higher between clicks then you are essentially not logging any online time, or something like that from my observation.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Shuffler on October 21, 2011, 09:41:17 AM
:D
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Lusche on October 21, 2011, 12:47:09 PM
Ironically, none of those nuke boys are on the top 10 "most time online" list.

That's simply because "time online" started to be tracked only 3 years ago. The top 10 guys by post count made the majority of their postings many years before that.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: whiteman on October 21, 2011, 12:52:46 PM

40,000 will be "God"

no you will have your account closed with a message that says go outside.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Skuzzy on October 21, 2011, 01:07:19 PM
Actually, I think we have 40,000 set to "Pasty Poster".
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Bronk on October 21, 2011, 01:15:29 PM
Congrats Karaya, 20,000 1 star posts and counting.  :D
We know if it was "legend" status you'd be spamming hard. :aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: ACE on October 21, 2011, 01:41:24 PM
208 days online Spikes? Jesus man.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: moot on October 21, 2011, 01:49:56 PM
Crawler bot
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Shuffler on October 21, 2011, 01:51:00 PM
Actually, I think we have 40,000 set to "Pasty Poster".

 :rofl
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: mensa180 on October 21, 2011, 01:51:15 PM
We know if it was "legend" status you'd be spamming hard. :aok

ohhhhhhsnap!
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: B4Buster on October 21, 2011, 01:52:04 PM
Actually, I think we have 40,000 set to "Pasty Poster".

Snuffler is already one of those without 40,000 posts  :devil
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Shuffler on October 21, 2011, 02:08:48 PM
Snuffler is already one of those without 40,000 posts  :devil

He's just mad because he got the hand-me-down blender :P
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: VonMessa on October 21, 2011, 02:17:34 PM
He's just mad because he got the hand-me-down blender :P

Is that the one that smells like piss from every time the previous occupant saw a 190? 

 :devil
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: ozrocker on October 22, 2011, 08:03:46 AM
Look at the seat in a 109g14, got brown/yellow streaks on the back support :aok
Now you know the rest of the story!
                                                                                                                               


                                                                                                                                     :cheers: Oz


                                                                                                         
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: TwinBoom on October 22, 2011, 08:19:47 AM
can
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: TwinBoom on October 22, 2011, 08:23:19 AM
i get
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: TwinBoom on October 22, 2011, 08:24:43 AM
this status?
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 22, 2011, 02:28:49 PM
You need about 18,000 more posts, keep working buddy  :airplane:.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Stang on October 22, 2011, 02:29:54 PM
Lawlz Bronk...
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: LCADolby on October 22, 2011, 03:30:14 PM
Remove post counting  :noid
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: grizz441 on October 22, 2011, 06:27:10 PM
We know if it was "legend" status you'd be spamming hard. :aok

I'm trying to incorporate your baby blue duplex into a joke but I'm having difficulty doing so.    Oh wait, that is the joke.    :ahand
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: DrBone1 on October 22, 2011, 07:39:09 PM
Joach1m manages almost 9 posts per day. Sorry Joachim  :D
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: MK-84 on October 22, 2011, 09:37:36 PM
I'm now one closer :noid
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: IrishOne on October 22, 2011, 10:09:27 PM
0.757 posts per day..........i guess i'm a slacker  :cry
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Ruah on October 22, 2011, 11:10:15 PM
so I just have to say something in every post for a few years right?
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: DMGOD on October 22, 2011, 11:48:25 PM
 :aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: FBCrabby on October 23, 2011, 05:32:23 AM
lets see about 6 posts a day... yeah I can do that?

Oh look #1 already! now to hook 5 more for today's quote :D
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Ruah on October 23, 2011, 07:51:06 AM
you wanna call this the radioactive post and make it the longest ever?
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 23, 2011, 01:52:46 PM
Can we really rival the hot air balloon duels thread?
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Bronk on October 23, 2011, 02:08:17 PM
Can we really rival the hot air balloon duels thread?
What was the thread that got nemesis banned? I like that thread.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 23, 2011, 02:13:32 PM
See Rule #14
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Masherbrum on October 23, 2011, 02:37:41 PM
What was the thread that got nemesis banned? I like that thread.

lulz bronk
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: 1701E on October 23, 2011, 02:56:28 PM
you wanna call this the radioactive post and make it the longest ever?


Good luck breaking that record. People would rather post meaningless questions in a never ending thread.

Top 10 Topics (by Replies):
   
Question Game, Round two!
8869
Exchange of everyday screenshots anyone?
5279
last word
3646
Three word story game....
3123
Funny Picture thread.
2591
B-29 Super Fortress
2571
General Climate Discussion
2082
yet another song game.
2059
The VOSS CONSPIRACY... fascinating new book
2006
Whistle blowing on Global Warming
1660

Top 10 Topics (by views):
   
Exchange of everyday screenshots anyone?
168652
Funny Picture thread.
94083
Question Game, Round two!
66601
The VOSS CONSPIRACY... fascinating new book
51068
Faces With the Names
50795
JG11 Recruiting
45785
RangerSounds v1.2 Soundpack
44221
B-29 Super Fortress
40290
Any old Air Warriors out there?????
39329
Mitsu's Sounds Collection V2.03 released
36618
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: B4Buster on October 23, 2011, 03:44:33 PM
What was the thread that got nemesis banned? I like that thread.

 :aok :rofl

I figured Tank Ace would know too.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: grizz441 on October 23, 2011, 03:51:45 PM
What was the thread that got nemesis banned? I like that thread.

I'm sure akak remembers, he was the instigator.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 23, 2011, 03:53:03 PM
Top 10 Topics (by views):
   
Exchange of everyday screenshots anyone?
168652
Funny Picture thread.
94083
Question Game, Round two!
66601
The VOSS CONSPIRACY... fascinating new book
51068
Faces With the Names
50795
JG 11 Recruiting
45785
RangerSounds v1.2 Soundpack
44221
B-29 Super Fortress
40290
Any old Air Warriors out there?????
39329
Mitsu's Sounds Collection V2.03 released
36618

 :headscratch:
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: bj229r on October 23, 2011, 04:28:49 PM
Damn, I need to get moving!
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Ack-Ack on October 23, 2011, 05:54:36 PM
I'm sure akak remembers, he was the instigator.  :cheers:

There have been so many that I don't recall.

ack-ack
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: 68ZooM on October 23, 2011, 05:58:58 PM
(http://i148.photobucket.com/albums/s35/68zoom/KWb.jpg)
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: LCADolby on October 24, 2011, 03:13:40 AM
... The VOSS CONSPIRACY... fascinating new book ...


That was a good read!  :aok :devil
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: VonMessa on October 24, 2011, 12:30:06 PM
:headscratch:

Don't worry, one day you will get it...

Until then, keep scratching  :aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: bj229r on October 24, 2011, 04:24:35 PM
Lol, the same people are STILL arguing the global warming thread.....elsewhere
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Shuffler on October 24, 2011, 05:31:42 PM
Is that the one that smells like piss from every time the previous occupant saw a 190? 

 :devil

Ahh yes we told him to stop trying to mark the 190s (he's such a dog sometimes). After all they are easy targets and we like to save them for the newest folks to shoot.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 24, 2011, 06:14:20 PM
but don't the fumes from the urine start burning your eyes, causing you to missidentify spits as 190's and 109's? Not a chance the nub-percentage for 190 pilots is high enough for an 'EZ kill' lable.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Chilli on October 25, 2011, 01:24:22 AM
You could tell karaya was making the big push when every other post of his was a  :aok

 :rofl :rofl :aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Shuffler on October 25, 2011, 12:06:56 PM
but don't the fumes from the urine start burning your eyes, causing you to missidentify spits as 190's and 109's? Not a chance the nub-percentage for 190 pilots is high enough for an 'EZ kill' lable.

No... not with the right diet.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 25, 2011, 04:07:28 PM
80th been trying to eat healthy lately  :D?
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: IrishOne on October 26, 2011, 12:26:22 AM
Ahh yes we told him to stop trying to mark the 190s (he's such a dog sometimes). After all they are easy targets and we like to save them for the newest folks to shoot.


that's what the real luftwaffe guys used to say about the P38  :aok
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Shuffler on October 26, 2011, 11:59:15 AM

that's what the real luftwaffe guys used to say about the P38  :aok

I heard entirely different :D

Oh, Hedy Lamarr is a beautiful gal, and Madeleine Carroll is too,
But you'll find if you query, a different theory amongst any bomber crew
For the loveliest thing of which one could sing (this side of the pearly gates)
Is no blonde or brunette of the Hollywood set -
But an escort of P-38s.

Yes, in the days that have passed,
when the tables were massed with glasses of scotch and champagne,
It's quite true that the sight was a thing of delight us,
intent on feeling no pain.
But no longer the same, nowadays is this game
When we head north for Messina Straits
Take the sparkling wine-every time,
just make mine an escort of P-38s.

Byron, Shelley and Keats ran a dozen dead heats
Describing the views from the hills,
of the valleys in May when the winds gently sway
In the air it's a different story;
We sweat out our track through the fighters and flak
We're willing to split up the glory
Well, they wouldn't reject us, so heaven protect us
and, until all this shooting abates,
Give us courage to fight 'em - one other small item -
an escort of P-38s.

— Frederic Arnold, 'Kohn's Wa
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: IrishOne on October 26, 2011, 01:43:44 PM
I heard entirely different :D

i have a book called "Fighter Aces of the Luftwaffe," and there is a section in there that talks about pilots letting the rookies creep up underneath the 38's and snag an easy kill due to the poor low six visabilty of the Lightning.    i'm not at home right now, but i have that page open in the book since i posted that last night  :D        i'll post the book name and it's author when i get home this afternoon, really a great read
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: B4Buster on October 26, 2011, 01:50:25 PM
Robin Olds owned 100 Me-109s in a P-38. Dogfights daid so.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 26, 2011, 04:31:15 PM
Sorry, but dogfights is usually wrong.


Saw one where it said a late model P-47D could keep up with a contemporary 109 in climb speed (that wasn't possible, the 109 outclimed all contemporary P-47 models).
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Shuffler on October 26, 2011, 04:33:08 PM
Dogfights is written by people tops in their field.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: IrishOne on October 26, 2011, 04:50:58 PM
i have a book called "Fighter Aces of the Luftwaffe," and there is a section in there that talks about pilots letting the rookies creep up underneath the 38's and snag an easy kill due to the poor low six visabilty of the Lightning.    i'm not at home right now, but i have that page open in the book since i posted that last night  :D        i'll post the book name and it's author when i get home this afternoon, really a great read

"Fighter Aces Of The Luftwaffe" by Colonel Raymond F. Toliver, USAF (Ret.) and Trevor J. Constable, intruduction by Adolf Galland. (really, an awesome book)

the part i was referring to shows a photo of the P-38 from the underside (in flight, obviously) and the excerpt underneath states...(page 174)

"This photo dramatically illustrates why the German fighter pilots liked to fight against the P-38.  The twin-engine nacelles created large 'blind spots' where the P-38 pilot could not see and the Luftwaffe took advantage of this deficiency.  Germans claim they liked to give new pilots their first victory by letting them have first crack at a P-38."

that aside, i'd recommend this book to anyone with any interest whatsoever in WWII combat aviation.    i've read it many times and will read it many more i'm sure.         :salute
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Tank-Ace on October 26, 2011, 04:54:59 PM
Dogfights is written by people tops in their field.

Yes, but that doesn't mean it isn't often times wrong regarding plane models and the like. The history and military channel in general are terrible for being ambiguous and inaccurate when comparing planes and vehicles.

M4 (as in the M4A1, A3, or A4) could NOT bounce an 88mm shell off their armor. An M4A3E2 might, but not a regular, plain old M4. Its just the small details, likely resulting from a lack of information.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: B4Buster on October 26, 2011, 04:55:27 PM
Sorry, but dogfights is usually wrong.


Spit that hook out now, boy.
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: ACE on October 26, 2011, 05:00:06 PM
:D busterr
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: Ruah on October 26, 2011, 11:03:13 PM
Spit that hook out now, boy.

dogfights is terribad. . .
Title: Re: Radioactive status?
Post by: 68ZooM on October 26, 2011, 11:23:34 PM
ignore my shameless post count reply............