Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: lunatic1 on October 22, 2011, 02:18:30 PM

Title: gv's
Post by: lunatic1 on October 22, 2011, 02:18:30 PM
hey hitech,please the next time you add or update gv's,,would u consider the m3 lee---and we need a new or updated version of the wirble
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: Karnak on October 22, 2011, 02:28:24 PM
and we need a new or updated version of the wirble
Why do we need a new or updated version of the Wirbelwind?  It is AH2 standard already.  The only GV that is not AH2 standard now is the M8.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: Tyrannis on October 22, 2011, 02:39:10 PM
+1 to the m3 lee. leaving the m3 lee out of the american tank lineup is liking leaving the p40 out of the American fighter lineup.

Im curious if the t34/Panzer IV would be lightly perked in EW if HTC added the m3 lee/Panzer II/other EW tanks.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: Butcher on October 22, 2011, 07:00:21 PM
+1 to the m3 lee. leaving the m3 lee out of the american tank lineup is liking leaving the p40 out of the American fighter lineup.

Im curious if the t34/Panzer IV would be lightly perked in EW if HTC added the m3 lee/Panzer II/other EW tanks.

Most likely the Pz4 and T34 would be perked, while M3 and other tanks would probably not be, british crusader's and Panzer 3's assuming in a few years
these become a choice in the list to be made.

Honestly there is a dozen other things that need to be made before the M3 right now, for example a British tank to fill the gap.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: MK-84 on October 22, 2011, 09:17:12 PM
Why do we need a new or updated version of the Wirbelwind?  It is AH2 standard already.  The only GV that is not AH2 standard now is the M8.

is the T34/76  "AH2?"  I was under the impression it was not.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: Karnak on October 22, 2011, 10:42:48 PM
is the T34/76  "AH2?"  I was under the impression it was not.
When AH v2.00 was released it introduced the first three AH2 standard units, the B-24J, Ki-84-Ia and T-34/76.

Graphically they were a marked improvement over AH1 units such as the B-26 and C.205, but they are significantly inferior to new units such as the Mosquito Mk XVI, A6M3 and M-18.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: MK-84 on October 22, 2011, 10:56:14 PM
When AH v2.00 was released it introduced the first three AH2 standard units, the B-24J, Ki-84-Ia and T-34/76.

Graphically they were a marked improvement over AH1 units such as the B-26 and C.205, but they are significantly inferior to new units such as the Mosquito Mk XVI, A6M3 and M-18.

I never knew that...why does the T34/76 look..well...shiny?  I saw a patch about fixing something like that, but it sticks out like a sore thumb compared to most of the other tanks.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: Karnak on October 22, 2011, 10:57:51 PM
I never knew that...why does the T34/76 look..well...shiny?  I saw a patch about fixing something like that, but it sticks out like a sore thumb compared to most of the other tanks.
If I recall correctly, and I may not, the first units of AH2 came before the adjustable "materials" file that determines a skin's reflectivity was added.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: lunatic1 on October 23, 2011, 10:22:51 AM
Why do we need a new or updated version of the Wirbelwind?  It is AH2 standard already.  The only GV that is not AH2 standard now is the M8.
well at least make the turret turn faster,,,like it did 3years ago
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: gyrene81 on October 23, 2011, 10:38:47 AM
well at least make the turret turn faster,,,like it did 3years ago
soooo...you would prefer gamey over historically accurate?
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: B4Buster on October 23, 2011, 10:54:18 AM
Heck, the wirbel is only a couple of years old, hardly needs an update  :aok
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: AKP on October 23, 2011, 11:22:46 AM
and we need a new or updated version of the wirble

Careful what you wish for... the last update the wirb and ostie got nerfed them to historical accurateness.   :D
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: 1Nicolas on October 23, 2011, 12:02:39 PM
hey hitech,please the next time you add or update gv's,,would u consider the m3 lee
Really, M3 Lee Is considered a Tank Destroyer in my world.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: Tyrannis on October 23, 2011, 12:03:43 PM
Really, M3 Lee Is considered a Tank Destroyer in my world.
it was a tank. not a tank destroyer.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: skorpion on October 23, 2011, 12:05:45 PM
Really, M3 Lee Is considered a Tank Destroyer in my world.
someone has been playing WoT too much...its a medium tank. the 75mm on the side was for attacking flanking GV's i think. the top 37mm works just fine too.

also the StuG III Ausf G. would be nice along with the M3.
Title: Re: gv's
Post by: MK-84 on October 23, 2011, 04:39:24 PM
someone has been playing WoT too much...its a medium tank. the 75mm on the side was for attacking flanking GV's i think. the top 37mm works just fine too.

also the StuG III Ausf G. would be nice along with the M3.

It was easier to manufacture that way as a stopgap until better designs were ready.  not to attack flanking tanks silly.