Author Topic: gv's  (Read 486 times)

Offline lunatic1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2795
gv's
« on: October 22, 2011, 02:18:30 PM »
hey hitech,please the next time you add or update gv's,,would u consider the m3 lee---and we need a new or updated version of the wirble
C.O. of the 173rd Guardian Angels---Don't fire until you can see the whites of their eyes...Major devereux(The Battle Of Wake Island-1941.
R.I.P.49GRIN/GRIN-R.I.P. WWHISKEY R.I.P WIZZY R.I.P.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: gv's
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2011, 02:28:24 PM »
and we need a new or updated version of the wirble
Why do we need a new or updated version of the Wirbelwind?  It is AH2 standard already.  The only GV that is not AH2 standard now is the M8.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: gv's
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2011, 02:39:10 PM »
+1 to the m3 lee. leaving the m3 lee out of the american tank lineup is liking leaving the p40 out of the American fighter lineup.

Im curious if the t34/Panzer IV would be lightly perked in EW if HTC added the m3 lee/Panzer II/other EW tanks.

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: gv's
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2011, 07:00:21 PM »
+1 to the m3 lee. leaving the m3 lee out of the american tank lineup is liking leaving the p40 out of the American fighter lineup.

Im curious if the t34/Panzer IV would be lightly perked in EW if HTC added the m3 lee/Panzer II/other EW tanks.

Most likely the Pz4 and T34 would be perked, while M3 and other tanks would probably not be, british crusader's and Panzer 3's assuming in a few years
these become a choice in the list to be made.

Honestly there is a dozen other things that need to be made before the M3 right now, for example a British tank to fill the gap.
JG 52

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: gv's
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2011, 09:17:12 PM »
Why do we need a new or updated version of the Wirbelwind?  It is AH2 standard already.  The only GV that is not AH2 standard now is the M8.

is the T34/76  "AH2?"  I was under the impression it was not.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: gv's
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2011, 10:42:48 PM »
is the T34/76  "AH2?"  I was under the impression it was not.
When AH v2.00 was released it introduced the first three AH2 standard units, the B-24J, Ki-84-Ia and T-34/76.

Graphically they were a marked improvement over AH1 units such as the B-26 and C.205, but they are significantly inferior to new units such as the Mosquito Mk XVI, A6M3 and M-18.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2011, 10:44:35 PM by Karnak »
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: gv's
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2011, 10:56:14 PM »
When AH v2.00 was released it introduced the first three AH2 standard units, the B-24J, Ki-84-Ia and T-34/76.

Graphically they were a marked improvement over AH1 units such as the B-26 and C.205, but they are significantly inferior to new units such as the Mosquito Mk XVI, A6M3 and M-18.

I never knew that...why does the T34/76 look..well...shiny?  I saw a patch about fixing something like that, but it sticks out like a sore thumb compared to most of the other tanks.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: gv's
« Reply #7 on: October 22, 2011, 10:57:51 PM »
I never knew that...why does the T34/76 look..well...shiny?  I saw a patch about fixing something like that, but it sticks out like a sore thumb compared to most of the other tanks.
If I recall correctly, and I may not, the first units of AH2 came before the adjustable "materials" file that determines a skin's reflectivity was added.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline lunatic1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2795
Re: gv's
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2011, 10:22:51 AM »
Why do we need a new or updated version of the Wirbelwind?  It is AH2 standard already.  The only GV that is not AH2 standard now is the M8.
well at least make the turret turn faster,,,like it did 3years ago
C.O. of the 173rd Guardian Angels---Don't fire until you can see the whites of their eyes...Major devereux(The Battle Of Wake Island-1941.
R.I.P.49GRIN/GRIN-R.I.P. WWHISKEY R.I.P WIZZY R.I.P.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: gv's
« Reply #9 on: October 23, 2011, 10:38:47 AM »
well at least make the turret turn faster,,,like it did 3years ago
soooo...you would prefer gamey over historically accurate?
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline B4Buster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
Re: gv's
« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2011, 10:54:18 AM »
Heck, the wirbel is only a couple of years old, hardly needs an update  :aok
"I was a door gunner on the space shuttle Columbia" - Scott12B

Offline AKP

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1294
Re: gv's
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2011, 11:22:46 AM »
and we need a new or updated version of the wirble

Careful what you wish for... the last update the wirb and ostie got nerfed them to historical accurateness.   :D

***G3-MF***

Offline 1Nicolas

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 176
Re: gv's
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2011, 12:02:39 PM »
hey hitech,please the next time you add or update gv's,,would u consider the m3 lee
Really, M3 Lee Is considered a Tank Destroyer in my world.

(My World Of Tank signature)
There are no great men, just great challenges which ordinary men, out of necessity, are forced by circumstances to meet.

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: gv's
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2011, 12:03:43 PM »
Really, M3 Lee Is considered a Tank Destroyer in my world.
it was a tank. not a tank destroyer.

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: gv's
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2011, 12:05:45 PM »
Really, M3 Lee Is considered a Tank Destroyer in my world.
someone has been playing WoT too much...its a medium tank. the 75mm on the side was for attacking flanking GV's i think. the top 37mm works just fine too.

also the StuG III Ausf G. would be nice along with the M3.