Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 11:03:29 AM

Title: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 11:03:29 AM
D-11,D-40,N models.

discuss
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Karnak on December 08, 2011, 11:04:46 AM
Yes, they are all in the game. Discuss what about them?

Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 11:07:22 AM
characteristics. tactics.

personally i use the excellent tail control to maneover.

I think the engine and paddle prop is undermodeled.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 11:07:45 AM
Yes, they are all in the game. Discuss what about them?



You get pilot wounds in them  and  no bullet holes in  canopy? Personally I Like the 11 the  most of those  3  rarely up a  N,  take a 40  heavy, but of  course I really like flying the  -25, of  course I  dont float them around   like you  do, Pretty much  keep it  to a  BnZ but  will  twist it  up  if I can see the  other guy is at  a clear  disadvantage  even if hes in a better turner  and avoid  climbing turns
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 11:23:19 AM
4prop, if you have a question ask it. If you have a point make it. Don't post just to pad your post count.


Because that's all your original post can be construed as.


Might as well have said "Diabetes: discuss."

That's not a topic. That's not even a statement. The closest thing you could describe it as is an imperative order. Best not to be ordering the entire forum around for your own amusement.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 11:28:29 AM

 "Diabetes: discuss."


Die  Ah Bee tees' or  Die ah Betus

Discuss :O

Also, he  already was called out to clarify what he  wanted to discuss in paticular.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Karnak on December 08, 2011, 11:35:19 AM
I think the engine and paddle prop is undermodeled.
Why do you think this?
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 11:36:21 AM
I'm not calling him out to clarify. I'm calling him out as a post count padder. There was nothing to discuss. He's just added that afterwards because (as you mention) he was called out on lack of topic. I'm calling him out on his intents more than the lack of topic.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 11:36:54 AM
Does  AH actually take into  account the paticular prop used? Also,  Krusty I see what your  saying but  now Karnak has  asked about  the prop undermodleing and I  am interested to learn about this now!
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 12:03:10 PM
Yes, AH does. The question you should ask is: Is that the particular plane we have in-game?
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: JUGgler on December 08, 2011, 12:10:38 PM
D-11,D-40,N models.

discuss


I pwn you!


discuss  :aok




JUGgler
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 12:41:54 PM
I'm not calling him out to clarify. I'm calling him out as a post count padder. There was nothing to discuss. He's just added that afterwards because (as you mention) he was called out on lack of topic. I'm calling him out on his intents more than the lack of topic.

coming from someone with as many posts as you? thats cute  :aok

the jugs that are suppost to have the paddle blade props dont climb like they should. I know this because I looked at many climb rate charts vs. AH climbrates. I'll have to look for them again because I dont remember exactly what they were but they (3 charts) were very comparable to P51 climb rates. In AH the R2800 is like a ford model T engine
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Debrody on December 08, 2011, 12:47:47 PM
coming from someone with as many posts as you? thats cute  :aok

the jugs that are suppost to have the paddle blade props dont climb like they should. I know this because I looked at many climb rate charts vs. AH climbrates. I'll have to look for them again because I dont remember exactly what they were but they (3 charts) were very comparable to P51 climb rates. In AH the R2800 is like a ford model T engine
until you post something exact, theres no apellata!
anyway a light jug can climb. just saying.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 12:49:49 PM
coming from someone with as many posts as you? thats cute  :aok

What's cute is you think that's 1) a defense, 2) an attack 3) relevant. MY posts are not in question here. Your attempt to post pad IS. See the difference? I'm not post count padding. You are.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: mthrockmor on December 08, 2011, 12:53:06 PM
JUGler, the boo would pwn you. Just fly in that dang 47, low and slow, hold still and we'll see who's boss!

Boo
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 12:53:36 PM
until you post something exact, theres no apellata!
anyway a light jug can climb. just saying.


Exactly.

D40 even outclimbs a P-51 in areas:

(http://www.hitechcreations.com/components/com_ahplaneperf/genchart.php?p1=0&p2=27&pw=2&gtype=2&gui=localhost&itemsel=GameData)

He's probably hauling back on the stick right after takeoff with bombs and/or rockets under the wings and full fuel and complaining that it can't climb.

Oh, and even the lackluster D-25 climbs as well as the P-51:

(http://www.hitechcreations.com/components/com_ahplaneperf/genchart.php?p1=0&p2=28&pw=2&gtype=2&gui=localhost&itemsel=GameData)

And let's not even get into the P-47N (light) and M!

(http://www.hitechcreations.com/components/com_ahplaneperf/genchart.php?p1=0&p2=102&pw=2&gtype=2&gui=localhost&itemsel=GameData)


P.S. those are in-game stats. That's what we have right now 4prop.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 12:54:08 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 12:54:25 PM
What's cute is you think that's 1) a defense, 2) an attack 3) relevant. MY posts are not in question here. Your attempt to post pad IS. See the difference? I'm not post count padding. You are.
in over 24k post im  sure  a  few of them may have possibly beeen viewed  as padding to some people, also what would happen if the  47 had the correct prop blade on it   how would that effect the climbrate(assuming other planes  do have this  prop and it is already modeled) Prop those  charts from ingame  do they look like the charts you saw out of  game maybe the  prop is  purely cosmetic in this case.  Back on point guys
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: mthrockmor on December 08, 2011, 12:56:08 PM
The P-47M has a MONSTER WEP, that is for certain. I was looking at that last night. I rarely fly the 47 but was getting tempted last night. Might be fun to fight it above 25k to see how well it goes. How mushy is the 47M at high alts, high speed and WEP aside? Do you spend most of the time with one notch of flaps?

Discuss!

Boo
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 12:57:58 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 01:00:27 PM
I dont fly the M much. I dont like the way it handles. It almost seems like the airframe is to small for the engine. 47s are good at high alt and can almost (if not better) roll faster then a 190D-9 at high speeds.
jugs can climb good but once a fight starts it seems like its outclassed when it comes to climbing with an opponent with same E levels.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 01:00:55 PM
How mushy is the 47M at high alts, high speed and WEP aside? Do you spend most of the time with one notch of flaps?

Uh, no! That'd be terrible. You don't fly at 1 notch! No more than you would at 1K!

It handles better than most simply because it has more horsepower. Up at alts the biggest problems are loss in alt with manuvers and the lack of ability to nose up. The 47s have better high alt power (the lift isn't so much the issue, it's this power that's the issue) so that can do more with better ease. I'm not saying it flies like it's on the deck, but it does handle better than many others.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 01:01:57 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 01:03:35 PM
See Rule #2
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 01:05:24 PM
See Rule #2
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 01:06:28 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 01:07:27 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 01:09:58 PM
See Rule #2
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 01:11:48 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 01:12:59 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Debrody on December 08, 2011, 01:14:36 PM
About the chart Krusty posted:
remember, the jug carries a load of fuel. As far as i know, those charts are with 100% fuel. So when its getting lighter, the jug is overtaking the pony (the fuel is a larger part of the total weight).

JugHead, you said you dont like how the M handles.
About 7-8 months ago i was taking a trip in the DA. I found the light M a very capable dogfighter, IMO thats better than a nearly full tank 109.
You talking about its handling characteristics: i was able to make a zeek (Maxous) do circles around me by tailwhipping left and right. My tactic worked til i ran outta altitude and the zeek started the continous circling...

So you can hate it, but thats still one of the steadyest planes in game, an excellent gun platform, fast like the lightning, climbs very well.

You wanted my opinion (discuss...): the d11 rocks, the d25 and d40 shucks, the N just cant roll well, the M handles like a d11 but much faster and climbs better.

Edit: may try it once, Krusty. Anyway, once a spit14 was trying to rolling scissor with my light N. While he was outturning me, i could stay inside and be slower, so he overshot and lost it. Not bad from a fat boy   ;)
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 01:18:13 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 01:28:08 PM
See Rule #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 01:29:30 PM
See Rule #2
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 08, 2011, 01:49:11 PM
See Rules #2, #4
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: JUGgler on December 08, 2011, 02:25:10 PM


 For the average player in the MA I would place the JUGS in order of best to worst as such.

#1- D11
#2- D40
#3- NJUG
#4- MJUG
#5- D25

Ofcourse The NJUG in my hands is something special and beautiful!

JUGgler
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: 4Prop on December 08, 2011, 02:33:09 PM

 For the average player in the MA I would place the JUGS in order of best to worst as such.

#1- D11
#2- D40
#3- NJUG
#4- MJUG
#5- D-25

Agreed


Ofcourse The NJUG in my hands is something special and beautiful!

JUGgler

as long as I dont get that rocket vulch!
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: JUGgler on December 08, 2011, 02:35:56 PM


long as I dont get that rocket vulch!



 :rofl :rofl  :aok



JUGgler
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 08, 2011, 02:47:26 PM
Really the d-25 is  the worst of them all? I LIKE the D-25! not as much as the D-11  but..ah  crap I dont have a cool  Jug related name so I  dont have a horse in the race. the rankings  ya posted is what all is taken into account pure  Dogfighting,  or  best overall in  most aspects?
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: uptown on December 08, 2011, 03:26:42 PM
The P-47M has a MONSTER WEP, that is for certain. I was looking at that last night. I rarely fly the 47 but was getting tempted last night. Might be fun to fight it above 25k to see how well it goes. How mushy is the 47M at high alts, high speed and WEP aside? Do you spend most of the time with one notch of flaps?

Discuss!

Boo
The M isn't mushy at all imo. Just keep at fast, fly smooth. Manual trimming seems to help with this one. I rather save the wep and stay out of the flaps until i have to come over the top or reverse really quick.That's when it starts getting mushy.... 200 IAS or so, hopefully the bandit will be even slower. Just depends on how and what the other guy is flying.
But I always save enough alt to rebulid E. and dive away. The P47s got to have E. The -11 not so much, but the others yeah.

I'd rank them:
#1 N
#2 40 because of the ord it can carry
#3 M
#4 11
#5 25

The only thing IMO that keeps the M model out of #1 is lack or ord.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: JUGgler on December 08, 2011, 03:53:50 PM
The M isn't mushy at all imo. Just keep at fast, fly smooth. Manual trimming seems to help with this one. I rather save the wep and stay out of the flaps until i have to come over the top or reverse really quick.That's when it starts getting mushy.... 200 IAS or so, hopefully the bandit will be even slower. Just depends on how and what the other guy is flying.
But I always save enough alt to rebulid E. and dive away. The P47s got to have E. The -11 not so much, but the others yeah.

I'd rank them:
#1 N
#2 40 because of the ord it can carry
#3 M
#4 11
#5 25

The only thing IMO that keeps the M model out of #1 is lack or ord.





I will agree the N is on top but only for those who can really get out of the N all she is capable of, the average guy doesn't have a clue!


The more I mess with them the more I realize just how different each is from the other, but that is cause I see the smallest of differences these days!



JUGgler
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: oakranger on December 08, 2011, 10:22:42 PM
I stick to the D-25.  Better speed over the D-11 and accerate better over the D-40. 


I will agree the N is on top but only for those who can really get out of the N all she is capable of, the average guy doesn't have a clue!


The more I mess with them the more I realize just how different each is from the other, but that is cause I see the smallest of differences these days!



JUGgler

I have chased down "N" in the D-25 and take them out. Some people just do not fly them right. "M" is one Jug that I just cannot match. To powerful against the D-25.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 09, 2011, 01:42:59 AM
The N can do anything the M can. Same engine, just a little more dry weight. Top speeds are only a few mph off from each other.

Chalk that up to blatant mis-use in the MAs if you can't catch the M but regularly catch the N. Pilot error.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Guppy35 on December 09, 2011, 02:29:38 AM

I will agree the N is on top but only for those who can really get out of the N all she is capable of, the average guy doesn't have a clue!


The more I mess with them the more I realize just how different each is from the other, but that is cause I see the smallest of differences these days!



JUGgler

I think that's the key with any of them.  Most folks don't know how to use them.  The guys that do, and JUG you were/are one of them, do things with them that the average cartoon driver can't.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Stoney on December 09, 2011, 03:04:04 AM
I stick to the D-25.  Better speed over the D-11 and accerate better over the D-40.  

I have chased down "N" in the D-25 and take them out. Some people just do not fly them right. "M" is one Jug that I just cannot match. To powerful against the D-25.

The D-25 cannot out accelerate the D-40 if the pilot knows what he's doing.  Its the same airframe with a more powerful engine in the D-40.  If you've chased down an N in the D-25, then the N pilot was either out of WEP, or not paying attention, as it possesses a whopping 600 more HP on WEP than the D-25, while only weighing in a bit heavier (relatively speaking).  

Personally, I'd rank them, in order of performance:  P-47M, P-47N, P-47D40, P-47D25, P-47D11 and in that order of air-to-air combat ability as well.  The D11 accelerates like a true pig.  People perceive an instantaneous turn advantage in the D11 because overall, it usually weighs in much less that the later models.  Before the M came out, I believe the N was the best air-to-air Jug platform, just because most MA fights usually evolve into 1v1 low-speed turn fights where the high power of the N makes it perform best.  Especially once it gets light, as the wingloading on the N (more wing area than the D models) starts approaching fully loaded Spitfire numbers (say at 1/4 tank of fuel and half ammo or less).  If you can stay in the fight with 800 rounds total and an 1/8th of a tank of fuel, the N can get pretty sprightly.  Now that the M is available, it is the air-to-air king of the Jugs, and handily so.  The weight of a D model with the power of an N model--that's the best of both worlds.  Its still a big, heavy aircraft, which is why it doesn't carry a perk--that, and the fights in-game typically don't occur at 28,000 feet like they did over Europe.  If the game constantly put you into combat at those altitudes, the Jug-M would be a perk plane because it would be one of the best performers in the game, behind the Me-262, Me-163, and arguably tied or better than the Ta-152 (and perhaps the Spit 14).

As for high-altitude combat, the ability of the Jug series to make basically sea level power at 30,000 feet is what makes it so deadly.  Thank the designers for that turbo system instead of a supercharger--a indicator of its design use being as an interceptor rather than a pursuit fighter.  But, fighting at that altitude requires a completely different skill set than most AH2 pilots possess from in-game experience, as you must be more patient, more methodical, and keep speed on the plane at the detriment of maneuvering.  The energy equations at those altitudes are completely different than they are at typical AH altitudes, and will humble you quickly if you don't adjust your flying technique.

I mark the whole series except for the N and M as some of the most difficult aircraft to master in-game, which is why Bluekitty, Yucca, and some of those folks were so impressive to watch in the D models...
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Guppy35 on December 09, 2011, 04:22:42 AM
When I've flown a Jug I take the D-40 if only because it reminds me of all those 9th AF ground attack guys who stuck their necks out doing really dangerous job.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: bozon on December 09, 2011, 07:51:42 AM
The D11 is the fighter model. The others are various types of trainers.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: JUGgler on December 09, 2011, 08:24:47 AM
The D-25 cannot out accelerate the D-40 if the pilot knows what he's doing.  Its the same airframe with a more powerful engine in the D-40.  If you've chased down an N in the D-25, then the N pilot was either out of WEP, or not paying attention, as it possesses a whopping 600 more HP on WEP than the D-25, while only weighing in a bit heavier (relatively speaking).  


As for high-altitude combat, the ability of the Jug series to make basically sea level power at 30,000 feet is what makes it so deadly.  Thank the designers for that turbo system instead of a supercharger--a indicator of its design use being as an interceptor rather than a pursuit fighter.  But, fighting at that altitude requires a completely different skill set than most AH2 pilots possess from in-game experience, as you must be more patient, more methodical, and keep speed on the plane at the detriment of maneuvering.  The energy equations at those altitudes are completely different than they are at typical AH altitudes, and will humble you quickly if you don't adjust your flying technique.

I mark the whole series except for the N and M as some of the most difficult aircraft to master in-game, which is why Bluekitty, Yucca, and some of those folks were so impressive to watch in the D models...




Preffered the "N", he said he could "move it around a bit better"  (don't confuse this with turning or clmbing better), and I agree.




JUGgler
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: JUGgler on December 09, 2011, 08:55:46 AM
 The N and D40 retain E far better than the others, The M has more raw power, the D11 turns the best


The D25 is in its own world of suck, yet it is my favorite!




JUGgler
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: oakranger on December 09, 2011, 09:44:52 AM
The D-25 cannot out accelerate the D-40 if the pilot knows what he's doing.  Its the same airframe with a more powerful engine in the D-40.  If you've chased down an N in the D-25, then the N pilot was either out of WEP, or not paying attention, as it possesses a whopping 600 more HP on WEP than the D-25, while only weighing in a bit heavier (relatively speaking).  


D-25 and D-40 acceleration are the same, but you are right if the pilot knows what he's doing. In fact, both jugs equal or nearly close to equal on all aspects of performance except the D-40 slightly better climb rate with WEP, D-25 slightly better on turn raids with no flaps and D-40 a hair better on turn raids with flaps.

Going back to acceleration. When I say I accelerated better than the D-40 that may because my load out. I never used %100 or %75 fuel. I also used the smaller load of the six gun package.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Stoney on December 09, 2011, 02:13:34 PM
D-25 and D-40 acceleration are the same, but you are right if the pilot knows what he's doing. In fact, both jugs equal or nearly close to equal on all aspects of performance except the D-40 slightly better climb rate with WEP, D-25 slightly better on turn raids with no flaps and D-40 a hair better on turn raids with flaps.

Going back to acceleration. When I say I accelerated better than the D-40 that may because my load out. I never used %100 or %75 fuel. I also used the smaller load of the six gun package.

D40 has more WEP horsepower with the same airframe, with 2600 HP available versus the 2200 HP on the D-25.  In a drag race at the same weight, it has to accelerate better.  With more power, its also going to have better sustained turn performance with WEP (note, not necessarily reflected in the turn radius), because it has more power available with the same power required.  The reason the D-40 has better climb rate is because of its higher power with WEP.  The D-25 has the same power as the D-11, but has the high-activity propeller (aka "paddleblade), which is reflected in the better climb rate.  It has a slower speed because of the wing pylons.

When comparing the D-25 and D-40, make sure you use the same load out, because they should have basically the same weight.  Personally, I never felt the 6-gun package was worth the loss in firepower.  But, if you do use it, remember that the only weight advantage is by using the 6-gun, light ammo load, as the 6-gun, heavy ammo load weighs more than the 8-gun, light ammo load.  For the D11, I always used the 8-gun light load, and 100% internal, with a drop.  Legs are too short to take off with less, IMO.  For the later model D's, I usually went with 75% internal and no drop.  For the N, it was always 50% internal, center drop.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 09, 2011, 02:35:49 PM
Ever try 3 drops and 25% in a N (with 6 guns light)?  :D

It's interesting. Definitely gamey, too. But interesting. Fly to the fight and drop the tanks to engage. You get about 1 or 2 quick fights and then have to worry about getting home as you're on fumes.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: RTHolmes on December 09, 2011, 02:56:10 PM
Personally, I'd rank them, in order of performance:  P-47M, P-47N, P-47D40, P-47D25, P-47D11 and in that order of air-to-air combat ability as well.

agreed

The D25 is in its own world of suck, yet it is my favorite!

also agreed :D

(I fly it because greebo did that lovely SEAC camo skin for it :aok)
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: oakranger on December 09, 2011, 03:01:50 PM
Ever try 3 drops and 25% in a N (with 6 guns light)?  :D

It's interesting. Definitely gamey, too. But interesting. Fly to the fight and drop the tanks to engage. You get about 1 or 2 quick fights and then have to worry about getting home as you're on fumes.

%50 is the most i put in with no DT. 
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Krusty on December 09, 2011, 04:06:43 PM
It gives you about 5 mins (with WEP) if I recall. So you take all 3 DTs in case you need to wing up or escort or whatever... then when you find the fight jetison all and tally ho! I've turned some heads doing that. Even caught one of my squaddies by surprise "How the heck did you stay vertical chasing him so long?!" (hung on my prop chasing a faster bogey).
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: guncrasher on December 09, 2011, 06:16:22 PM
p47's suck, fear the mighty pony  :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:.   .....to be honest except for lilmak (100% sure he cheats  :mad:   :noid) plus the other guy who invented the tail drag.


semp
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: oakranger on December 10, 2011, 08:06:33 PM
p47's suck, fear the mighty pony  :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:.   .....to be honest except for lilmak (100% sure he cheats  :mad:   :noid) plus the other guy who invented the tail drag.


semp

I thought you are a 109 type.  Huh.



Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Nathan60 on December 12, 2011, 01:23:26 PM
I thought you are a 109 type.  Huh.





Semp's  a Spitdweeb, or  a bombtar'd Then again  I usually  avoid Semp and  have no clue  what he  flys, as there is only 4  guys  that can beat him in a  fight and I get no  kills when he's around  :uhoh :bolt:
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: bj229r on December 17, 2011, 04:59:03 PM
M is an Lgay with 8 50's...plane has no soul. N not as maneuverable, but does neat stuff at lower speeds, where M falls outta the sky like a D9
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Big Rat on December 18, 2011, 09:32:36 AM
I think the M's true asset is as an high alt escort fighter, I'll take it over a pony any day over 25k.  Great high alt speed, 8 .50's for instantaneous severe punishment at good range, good fuel range, tough, and great diving ability.  Wonderful plane for that role :aok

 :salute
BigRat
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Karnak on December 18, 2011, 09:41:57 AM
I think the M's true asset is as an high alt escort fighter, I'll take it over a pony any day over 25k.  Great high alt speed, 8 .50's for instantaneous severe punishment at good range, good fuel range, tough, and great diving ability.  Wonderful plane for that role :aok

 :salute
BigRat
M?  I thought the M was short ranged.  The N on the other hand is extremely long ranged.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: MiloMorai on December 18, 2011, 10:08:19 AM
M?  I thought the M was short ranged.  The N on the other hand is extremely long ranged.

Yup, the M was the problematic hotrod.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Big Rat on December 18, 2011, 10:18:05 AM
M?  I thought the M was short ranged.  The N on the other hand is extremely long ranged.

Good, not great, with 3 drop tanks on an M it goes for a good long while.  Not Pony while but still good.

 :salute
BigRat
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Lusche on December 18, 2011, 11:03:08 AM
Good, not great, with 3 drop tanks on an M it goes for a good long while.  Not Pony while but still good.


To put it into numbers:

maximum endurance MIL @ sea level, 100% fuel / 100% + max DT loadout

D-11      33/41 minutes
D-40      40/81 minutes
M          29/67 minutes
N          57/96 minutes

for comparison:
Pony D  50/80 minutes
Ta 152  56/73 minutes
Mossie6 71/98 minutes
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Plazus on December 18, 2011, 02:27:53 PM
D-11,D-40,N models.

discuss

Well you see, the cool thing about the Jug is
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: MK-84 on December 18, 2011, 02:32:53 PM
Well you see, the cool thing about the Jug is

Is what? :headscratch:
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: The Fugitive on December 18, 2011, 02:40:17 PM
Is what? :headscratch:

I think what he is saying is there isn't anything cool about the jug.  :devil
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: JUGgler on December 19, 2011, 08:22:59 AM
Well you see, the cool thing about the Jug is

It PWNS joo?    :neener:





JUGgler
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Scca on December 21, 2011, 07:09:36 AM
I have been flying an M frequently for a week now, and really like it for the really high fights. 
 
One of my favorite greifer things to do is out alt the alt monkeys.  It's satisfying to watch them  :x and dive to the deck to run away.  While a few stay and fight, most of these pickers turn tail and run like a little girl (elbows in, holding skirt)...  Of course, the M can catch most anything if it has a head of steam up, so usually they fail to get away.  As with the case of most pickers, they don't know how to handle a knife fight, so they are easy marks when they don't have the alt advantage...

Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: DMVIAGRA on December 21, 2011, 10:17:48 AM
Well, I have a certain view of the P-47s.

D-11-Low Alt Turn Fighter P-47
D-25-High Alt Vulch Fighter
D-40-Fighter Bomber
M- All Around Bad A**
N-Long Range Fighter/CV Spotter/Recon

I mainly flew the D-25 last tour, I got fond of the dive speed, then I flew the N because I wanted something speedy and long range to find CVs. Didn't fly any other of them too much.

However I did gain interest in the P-40E, but that was before it was ruined.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Raptor05121 on December 21, 2011, 02:13:06 PM


However I did gain interest in the P-40E, but that was before it was ruined.

You liked the oversized tires?

I like the N because it is the highest letter in the alphabet  :noid
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: DMVIAGRA on December 21, 2011, 02:30:37 PM
You liked the oversized tires?

I like the N because it is the highest letter in the alphabet  :noid
No, because it was the best performer out of them. It also had some VERY VERY nice skins. Down side to it now is the WEP is gone and it's slow as a stone boat.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Stoney on December 21, 2011, 03:29:06 PM
I have been flying an M frequently for a week now, and really like it for the really high fights. 
 
One of my favorite greifer things to do is out alt the alt monkeys.  It's satisfying to watch them  :x and dive to the deck to run away.  While a few stay and fight, most of these pickers turn tail and run like a little girl (elbows in, holding skirt)...  Of course, the M can catch most anything if it has a head of steam up, so usually they fail to get away.  As with the case of most pickers, they don't know how to handle a knife fight, so they are easy marks when they don't have the alt advantage...



My squaddies and I a couple of years ago, used to grab P-47Ns with max drop tanks and 100%, climb up to about 30,000 feet, and patrol around the map looking for high-altitude bombers.  It was good practice at staying together at high speeds, trying to get as much fuel economy as possible while zorching around at 400 mph, and 4-5 Jug-N's at that altitude and speed were pretty lethal.  We'd just chase the darbar.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Karnak on December 21, 2011, 03:59:39 PM
No, because it was the best performer out of them. It also had some VERY VERY nice skins. Down side to it now is the WEP is gone and it's slow as a stone boat.
So you take it that correcting inaccuracies is "ruining" something?  I see it as fixing something.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: DMVIAGRA on December 21, 2011, 04:24:50 PM
My squaddies and I a couple of years ago, used to grab P-47Ns with max drop tanks and 100%, climb up to about 30,000 feet, and patrol around the map looking for high-altitude bombers.  It was good practice at staying together at high speeds, trying to get as much fuel economy as possible while zorching around at 400 mph, and 4-5 Jug-N's at that altitude and speed were pretty lethal.  We'd just chase the darbar.
That's what I used to do!
 :old:
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Plazus on December 28, 2011, 04:51:21 PM
It PWNS joo?    :neener:

Nope. They are better in pairs. :)
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: B4Buster on December 29, 2011, 11:57:34 AM
I flew the N Jug for the first time in quite some time (I'd guess atleast a year) and wow...what a monster.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Seadog36 on December 29, 2011, 01:36:21 PM
+1 D-11 my #1 Jug ride

Still want the D-21/23 paddle prop more fuel/ord, if you want it, excellent climb rate and the best looking WWII fighter in my personal opinion.

Half the D-11 skins in the game are actually later 1944 universal wing models. Broken record on this but looking forward to the day when we get'em.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: lyric1 on January 03, 2012, 11:58:47 PM
Wonder how prevalent this was during the war? As if 8x50's aren't bad enough.

Perks for ord any one?  :O


http://www.fold3.com/image/#39053692

http://www.fold3.com/image/#32443925
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Stoney on January 04, 2012, 12:51:33 AM
Wonder how prevalent this was during the war? As if 8x50's aren't bad enough.

Perks for ord any one?  :O


http://www.fold3.com/image/#39053692

http://www.fold3.com/image/#32443925

Never read any history on this.  Given that the 78th was an 8th AF FG, I find the armament a bit strange.  Could only have been for ground attack, maybe in the follow up operations to Market Garden, as they would have needed fuel tanks for escort duty.  Cool pics though Lyric, as always...
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Seadog36 on January 04, 2012, 04:43:29 AM
I read the 20mm cannon pods were experimental and never really were utilized extensively~ I'll try to find the source. 8x .50s seems like it should be enough for any job.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: MAINER on January 04, 2012, 11:07:56 AM
Wonder how prevalent this was during the war? As if 8x50's aren't bad enough.

Perks for ord any one?  :O


http://www.fold3.com/image/#39053692

http://www.fold3.com/image/#32443925

Those underwing gun pods would be cool!
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Rob52240 on January 04, 2012, 12:01:57 PM
I tend the fly the D-40 most, unless I need range then I take the N model.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Charge on January 04, 2012, 01:33:21 PM
"I read the 20mm cannon pods were experimental and never really were utilized extensively~ I'll try to find the source. 8x .50s seems like it should be enough for any job."

You rather need to ask why did they try them in the first place? I think it was the other way around. There is something a 20mm Hisso can do that no amount of .50 can do, but such pod installation was just not worth the perfomance penalty or that it reserved the wing loading point from a bomb. But of course at that time and situation the 8 .50s were generally good enough.

-C+
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Rob52240 on January 04, 2012, 02:21:19 PM
Nice Color WW2 P-47 video.  The shooting starts 2 minutes in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUW-i9jn8Sg&feature=related
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: MAINER on January 05, 2012, 05:28:04 PM
Nice Color WW2 P-47 video.  The shooting starts 2 minutes in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUW-i9jn8Sg&feature=related

Nice video!
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: oakranger on January 07, 2012, 08:42:08 PM
I read the 20mm cannon pods were experimental and never really were utilized extensively~ I'll try to find the source. 8x .50s seems like it should be enough for any job.


^^^^ What he said.  It was only experimental a created a lot of drag.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: oakranger on January 07, 2012, 08:45:49 PM
"I read the 20mm cannon pods were experimental and never really were utilized extensively~ I'll try to find the source. 8x .50s seems like it should be enough for any job."

You rather need to ask why did they try them in the first place? I think it was the other way around. There is something a 20mm Hisso can do that no amount of .50 can do, but such pod installation was just not worth the perfomance penalty or that it reserved the wing loading point from a bomb. But of course at that time and situation the 8 .50s were generally good enough.

-C+

Them doing this was on the same level as to P-38 carrying torpedoes and troop carry pods.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: DMVIAGRA on January 13, 2012, 08:01:43 AM
Thunderbolts don't kill people, I kill people; with Thunderbolts.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Ack-Ack on January 13, 2012, 01:19:27 PM
Them doing this was on the same level as to P-38 carrying torpedoes and troop carry pods.

The troop carrying pods for the P-38 weren't experimental and were used, though not often.

ack-ack
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Seadog36 on January 13, 2012, 01:33:10 PM
They also made ice cream by putting cream and sugar in drop tanks and flying to altitude to freeze it~ I suppose that could be a perk option for resupplying a base. :lol
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: oakranger on January 13, 2012, 04:26:26 PM
The troop carrying pods for the P-38 weren't experimental and were used, though not often.

ack-ack

I remember when you talked about the troop carrying pods, but do not recall if they actually used that method, thanks for correcting me on that. As for the torpedoes, was that experimental or was it practical?
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Ack-Ack on January 13, 2012, 04:38:47 PM
I remember when you talked about the troop carrying pods, but do not recall if they actually used that method, thanks for correcting me on that. As for the torpedoes, was that experimental or was it practical?

experimental only with the torpedoes. 

ack-ack
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: -ammo- on February 01, 2012, 01:18:56 PM
Nice discussion.  I haven't logged in and flew in what seems like a millineum, and there are many planes modeled now thyat weren't when I was active.  When I was with the 56th FG, we learned and flew the D11 and D40 the way it was supposed to flown and did quite well with it.  we would go up in a group in an event or in the MA when our individual schedules allowed, and we terrorized.

Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Rob52240 on February 01, 2012, 03:16:47 PM
I thought that aerial Torpedoes were all but phased out by all air forces well before the end of the war.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Widewing on February 01, 2012, 06:07:26 PM
Nice discussion.  I haven't logged in and flew in what seems like a millineum, and there are many planes modeled now thyat weren't when I was active.  When I was with the 56th FG, we learned and flew the D11 and D40 the way it was supposed to flown and did quite well with it.  we would go up in a group in an event or in the MA when our individual schedules allowed, and we terrorized.



Ammo, how the hell have you been? It's great to see you here.

For those who wouldn't know, Ammo was one of my mentors when I first started playing a very long time ago.
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 01, 2012, 06:39:46 PM
I thought that aerial Torpedoes were all but phased out by all air forces well before the end of the war.


USAAF was experimenting with glide torpedoes dropped from B-25Js during the last couple of weeks of the war.

ack-ack
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: -ammo- on February 02, 2012, 12:31:43 AM
Ammo, how the hell have you been? It's great to see you here.

For those who wouldn't know, Ammo was one of my mentors when I first started playing a very long time ago.

Doing great WW.  I have been all over the place but have been working in Germany since 2006.  Retired from the USAF last year and took one of those silly DOD civilian jobs.

I have missd AH for a long time and seriously considering buying a desktop computer and gear so I can start again.  I would definitely be a rookie again if I do so:)

Hope all is well with you!
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: DMVIAGRA on February 02, 2012, 04:51:17 AM
(http://i570.photobucket.com/albums/ss147/tnelson3_bucket/WWII/Untitled-1.jpg)

I want to be this guy...
Title: Re: P-47.
Post by: WYOKIDIII on February 02, 2012, 05:06:42 AM
If you see a P-47 with a red icon and it's LePape , chances are your gonna get hurt .